Extension of the Powers of Persons Brought to Subsidiary Liability in the Framework of an Insolvency (Bankruptcy) Case

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

The purpose of the study. In this article, the author explores the issue related to the powers of persons brought to subsidiary liability in the framework of an insolvency (bankruptcy) case. The basic rights of persons controlling the debtor in the bankruptcy case are considered. The judicial practice on this issue is analyzed. The author of the study concludes that at the legislative level, the rights of this category of persons are limited. In addition, the current judicial practice, which affects the rights and legitimate interests of persons controlling the debtor, is also ambiguous. The question of the permissibility of expanding the scope of powers of persons controlling the debtor has also been reflected in the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. It can be said that the legislator seeks to provide persons subject to subsidiary liability with a similar amount of rights as those involved in bankruptcy proceedings. However, in practice, gaps still occur: for example, the courts today have not formed a unified position regarding the scope of the rights of persons controlling the debtor in the framework of separate disputes in the case of insolvency (bankruptcy) of the debtor. This article is devoted to the declared topic, the author analyzes the gaps in law enforcement practice, and suggests ways to fill them.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Alexandr Sharudilov

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation; LLC «Yuko-Audit»

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: Alexandresharudilov@gmail.com

Postgraduate student

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow; Moscow

参考

  1. Momzikova M., Subsidiary liability: advice to the creditor// 2019, N 12, p. 70;
  2. Bayazitov T., The sword of Damocles of the Russian bankrupt: subsidiary liability//, 2019, N 11, p. 70;
  3. Ruchkina G.F. Financial support as a key component in the development of small and medium-sized businesses // Banking law. 2017. N 5. p. 7-12;
  4. Dyachuk M., The rights of persons subject to subsidiary liability in a bankruptcy case// Legal guide of the head//2022, N 7;
  5. Momzikova M., The person controlling the debtor: who will answer for the company's debts// 2021, N 2, p. 42;
  6. Momzikova M., How to protect yourself from subsidiary responsibility to the head and founder // 2020, N 1, p. 73;
  7. Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Volga District of 25.09.2019 in case N A72-14512/2018;
  8. Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the North-Western District of 09.02.2022 N F07-1565/2022 in case N A56-45590/2015;
  9. Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated 06.08.2018 N 308-ES17-6757 in case N A22-941/2006;
  10. Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 26.05.2020 N 1105-O;
  11. Rulings of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 20.07.2021 N 1500-O;
  12. Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Volga-Vyatka district of 17.12.2019 in case N A79-11049/2016;
  13. Resolution of the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal of 11.11.2020 in case N A40-61333/2015;
  14. Determination of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 30.09.2021 N 307-ES21-9176 in case N A56-17680/2017;
  15. Resolution of the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal dated 02/28/2020 in case N A40-7290/2015;
  16. Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow District of 12.11.2021 in the case N A40-172177/2017;
  17. Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Far Eastern District of 01.04.2021 in case N A51-32010/2016;
  18. Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated 30.09.2019 No. 305-ES19-10079 in case No. A41-87043/2015.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML


##common.cookie##