Introduction to Judicial Specialty:Basic Scientific Interdisciplinary Study

The article describes the main scientific results of the study, taking into account the author’s modern representations, which consist in the formation of the basis of the new direction in the system of general theory of forensic science—forensic accounting on the implementation of special knowledge beyond forensic expertise (Forensic Specialty or Special Science) and the development of an integrated interdisciplinary framework that develops forensic science. This article is a continuation of the requirements for the publication of the main results of the thesis for the degree of doctor of legal sciences, and also reflects the empirical basis of the research. On the basis of the research carried out by the author, including those published in the scientific works of the author: a) the expediency and timeliness of the development of the forensic doctrine on the implementation of special knowledge outside the forensic expertise has been substantiated. In this connection, the concept, object, subject, structure, principles, tasks and functions of the Teaching are first disclosed and scientifically substantiated, as well as the language of forensic doctrine on the implementation of special knowledge beyond forensic expertise allowing to enter into scientific circulation a new forensic term «specialty» and clarify the concepts of «specialist», «special knowledge», «expert opinion», «expert testimony» et al. b) the original scientific hypothesis for the adoption of the new codified act—the federal law «On the activity of a specialist in the Russian Federation», which determines the legal basis, the principles of the organization of the activity of a specialist in the Russian Federation and the procedure for its implementation in constitutional, civil, arbitration, administrative and criminal proceedings, as well as the introduction of amendments and additions to the current legislation of the Russian Federation concerning the powers and activities of individuals, Having specialized knowledge outside forensic expertise, taking into account the needs and support of some practitioners of law enforcement and other bodies of the Russian Federation; c) developed scientifically based proposals and practical recommendations, aimed at improving the activities of law enforcement agencies to implement special knowledge outside of forensic expertise, taking into account the specifics of the subject of the study, modern realities and new approaches to problem solving; r) proved the prospect of formation and trends in the development of forensic science on the implementation of special knowledge outside forensic expertise as a new complex interdisciplinary scientific research, as well as the development and introduction into law enforcement activities of the universal forensic information system «Spez» in the conditions of digitalization. The methodology of the study is composed of a dialectic-materialistic approach, which made it possible to study the nature and nature of the implementation of specialized knowledge outside of forensic expertise, creating a theoretical basis for forensic learning about the implementation of specialized knowledge outside forensic expertise. In the course of the study, a number of private scientific methods, traditional for studying legal phenomena, were used: historical—in the analysis of factors that determine the formation of the forensic doctrine on the implementation of specialized knowledge outside the forensic examination; formal-logical, Comparative-legal, systemic-structural methods—in the complex study of forensic science on the implementation of specialized knowledge outside forensic expertise, as well as the study of the mechanism of its legal regulation; statistical method—for the generalization of forensic science, Procuratorial, investigative, legal, expert, forensic and intelligence-gathering practices; a method of generalizing practice—which makes it possible to identify typical, Similar, concordant in the main directions of forensic science on the implementation of special knowledge outside of forensic expertise; sociological method—when conducting a questionnaire and interview on current aspects of the study. In general, general scientific methods were mainly used in the theoretical substantiation of the forensic doctrine on the implementation of special knowledge outside the forensic examination as a new complex interdisciplinary scientific research. Specific (private) methods have been applied in an integrated manner to the study of specific forms and types of implementation of expertise outside forensic expertise.