Improving Industrial Policy Measures to Strengthen the Systematic Regulation of Technological Safety in Russia under Sanctions

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

The subject of research in the article is the technological security of Russia, which is acquiring particular relevance in the context of growing geopolitical tensions. Special attention is paid to technological sovereignty as a significant factor in ensuring the country's technological security in the context of unprecedented sanctions. In line with this current topic, the goal is to develop a number of significant industrial policy measures that will make it possible to strengthen the systematic regulation of technological safety in Russia in the context of sanctions. The novelty of the research lies in the substantiation and development of four groups of systemic measures aimed at ensuring consistency, coherence, diversification and balance of regulatory influences when solving technological safety problems. The first group of proposed measures affects the Concept of Technological Development of the Russian Federation. Their implementation will improve the consistency of the Concept with existing strategic planning documents and eliminate identified logical inconsistencies through the use of a specially developed structural and logical design. The second group of measures relates to the formation of feedback, which makes it possible to adjust priorities and distribute government funding among government support options, taking into account assessments of business preferences. The third group of measures is focused on ensuring diversification and balance of external sources of technology, which allows reducing the risks of dependence on one partner and thereby increasing the country’s technological security. The fourth group of measures is aimed at ensuring diversification and balance of domestic sources of technology. The need for a combination of adaptation (urgent) and long-term measures of state support for technological projects is substantiated. In general, the proposed measures will help strengthen the consistency and improve the quality of state regulation in the field of ensuring Russia’s technological security under sanctions.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Lyudmila Obolenskaya

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: OVObolenskaya@fa.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1016-9171
SPIN 代码: 7461-0270
Scopus 作者 ID: 57204951512

Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Leader research associate, Institute for Financial and Industrial Policy

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Susanna Bekulova

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Email: SRBekulova@fa.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1384-4694
SPIN 代码: 8772-6960

Junior Researcher at the Institute of Financial and Industrial Policy

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Aksenova A.A., Shindikova I.G. (2020). Assessing the level of economic security (based on technological security). Innovative economics: development prospects and the future, 7(49), pp. 5–12. doi: 10.47581/2020/10.23.PS85/IE/7/49.001.
  2. Rubtsov A.G. (2021). Assessing the economic security of the Russian Federation in the technological sphere. Bulletin of the Russian Economic University named after G. V. Plekhanov, 6, 220–234. doi: 10.21686/2413-2829-2021-6-220-234.
  3. Goryacheva T.V., Myzrova O.A. (2023). The role and place of technological sovereignty in ensuring the sustainability of the Russian economy. News of Saratov University. New episode. Series: Economics. Control. Right, 2, 134–145. doi: 10.18500/1994-2540-2023-23-2-134-145.
  4. Ezdina N.P., Danilov D.R. (2023). On the issue of ensuring technological safety in the context of economic security in Russia. Economics and innovation management, 2 (25), 31–39. doi: 10.26730/2587-5574-2023-2-31-39.
  5. Gretchenko A.I., Gretchenko A.A. (2022). Technological safety of Russia: current state, threats and methods of ensuring. Economic safety, 2, 547–570. doi: 10.18334/ecsec.5.2.114429.
  6. Edler J., Blind K., Kroll H., Schubert T. (2023). Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy: defining rationales, ends and means. Research Policy, 52(6), Article 104765. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2023.104765.
  7. March C., Schieferdecker I. (2023). Technological Sovereignty as Ability, Not Autarky. International Studies Review, 2, viad012. doi: 10.1093/isr/viad012.
  8. Dietlmeier S.F., Urmetzer F. (2023). Tech Sovereignty and Industrial Ecosystems, MPRA Paper 120558. University Library of Munich. Germany. URL: https//mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/120558/1/MPRA_paper_120558.pdf (date of access: 14.07.2024).
  9. Boeing P., Mueller E. (2024). Global influence of inventions and technology sovereignty. ZEW policy briefs. URL: https//papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4802795 (date of the access: 14.07.2024).
  10. Caravella S., Crespi F., Cucignatto G., Guarascio D. (2023). Technological Sovereignty and Strategic Dependencies: The case of the Photovoltaic Supply Chain. GLO Discussion Paper, 1330. URL: https//leap.luiss.it/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/WP10.23-Technological-Sovereignty-and-Strategic-Dependencies-LEAP.pdf (date of access: 14.07.2024).
  11. Chrétien J., Drouard E., Buffet G., Castex L., Dechoux A., et al. (2022). European technological sovereignty. Think tank Renaissance Numérique. URL: https//hal.science/hal-03574500v1/file/RenaissanceNumerique_TechnologicalSovereignty_Note.pdf (date of access:14.07.2024).
  12. Ladynin A.I. (2022). System of indicators of scientific and technological security of Russia. World of Economics and Management, 2, 23–35. doi: 10.25205/2542-0429-2022-22-2-23-35.
  13. Mukha D.V. (2022). Current issues of ensuring scientific and technological security of the Republic of Belarus in the conditions of innovative development of the national economy. Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus: Collection of scientific articles, 4, 21–42. doi: 10.47612/27895122202242142.
  14. Varshavsky A.E. (2015). Methodological principles for assessing the scientific and technological security of Russia. Bulletin of Moscow University. Episode 25: International relations and world politics, 4, 73–100.
  15. Prikhodko I.I. (2022). Theoretical aspects of the concept of technological sovereignty. Scientific notes of the Crimean Federal University named after V. I. Vernadsky. Economics and Management, 4, 88-96.
  16. Egorova A.A., Danilov I.A., Dovbiy I.P. (2022). Technological sovereignty: retrospective analysis and prospects in conditions of increased economic volatility. Bulletin of ChelSU, 12 (470), 33–44. doi: 10.47475/1994-2796-2022-11205
  17. Tomin L.V. (2023). Discussions about technological sovereignty: analysis of conceptual principles and justification of strategies. POLITEX, 1, 22–35.
  18. Dementyev V.E. (2023). Technological sovereignty and priorities for production localization. Space of Economics, 1, 6–18. doi: 10.18522/2073-6606-2023-21-1-6-18.
  19. Yankovskaya E.S. (2022). Technological sovereignty of Russia: concept, essence, strategy and ways of its implementation. Scientific Notes of St. Petersburg named after V.B. Bobkov branch of the Russian Customs Academy, 4 (84), 76–81.
  20. Afanasyev A.A. (2022). Technological sovereignty: main policy directions to achieve it in modern Russia. Issues of innovative economics, 4, 2193–2212. doi: 10.18334/vinec.12.4.116433.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Fig. 1. Results of a targeted survey of businesses on the importance of government support options in solving the problems of ensuring technological sovereignty under sanctions. Source: data from the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs[11].

下载 (232KB)
索引源数据