Weak Subject of Family Relations: A Comparative Legal Study
- Authors: Gulyaeva O.N.1
-
Affiliations:
- Perm State National Research University
- Issue: Vol 18, No 5 (2022)
- Pages: 128-132
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2541-8025/article/view/546080
- ID: 546080
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription or Fee Access
Abstract
The purpose of the research. The effect of the principle of protection of a weak subject in family legal relations is analyzed. The study was conducted by comparing the family legislation of the Republic of Chile and the Russian Federation. This choice is conditioned by the direct consolidation in the Chilean family legislation of the principle of protection of a weak spouse. Results. It is concluded that it is impossible to borrow institutions for the protection of a weak spouse into the legal system of Russia. Putting forward the hypothesis of a possible identification of the weak position of women in Russian family legal relations by gender, the author comes to its refutation. The author substantiates the identification of a psychophysiological sign of a weak subject of a private law relationship.
About the authors
Olga N. Gulyaeva
Perm State National Research University
Email: o.n.b.t.a.m@yandex.ru
Graduate student Perm, Russian Federation
References
- Bryukhina E.R., Tretyakova E.S. Women's rights in the context of universal, regional and national (Russian) standards and mechanisms for the protection of human rights // Bulletin of the Perm University of Law. 2021. №. 3. Pp. 516-539.
- Volos A.A. Weak side of the marriage contract // Notary. 2018. №. 4. Pp. 26-29.
- Kalachikova O.N., Gruzdeva M.A. Gender stereotypes in the modern family: women and men (based on sociological research) // Woman in Russian society. 2019. №. 1. Pp. 64-76.
- Krasheninnikov P., Mikheeva L., Rasskazova N., Petrov E., Arkhipov D., Fedorova O., Aleinikova V., Dergunova V. Reform of the matrimonial property regime // Law. 2019. №. 12. Pp. 20-32.
- Kuznetsova O.A. Norms-principles of Russian civil law. M.: Statut, 2006. 269 p.
- Pyankova A.F. Prospects for the legal regulation of property relations of spouses // Ex jure. 2020. №. 4. Pp. 106-121.
- Shablinsky I.G. Post-Authoritarian Development and Resolution of Constitutional and Political Crises: Paraguay and Chile // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. 2022. №. 2. Pp. 13-23.
- Águila R.D. La compensación económica en la nueva legislación de matrimonio civil // REVISTA ACTUALIDAD JURIDICA. 2007. № 15. P. 83-93.
- Cox L. Divorcio en Chile. Un análisis preliminar tras la nueva Ley de Matrimonio Civil // Estudios Públicos. 2011. № 123. P. 95-187.
- Dickfos J., Brown C., Bettles J. Superannuation and Bankruptcy: Is There a Mid-Life Crisis Looming? // QUT Law Review. № 17. 2017. P. 114-126.
- Heinze C.; Steinrotter B. Procedural Position of a 'Weaker Party' in the Regulation Brussels Ibis // BRUSSELS IBIS REGULATION: CHANGES AND CHALLENGES OF THE RENEWED PROCEDURAL SCHEME. 2017. P. 51-70.
- Molina C.L. The principle of protection of the weaker spouse in modern family law // REVISTA CHILENA DE DERECHO. 2013. № 2. P. 513-548.
- Whittaker S. Unfair Terms in Commercial Contracts and the Two Laws of Competition: French Law and English Law Contrasted // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. № 39. 2019. P. 404-434.
Supplementary files
