Russian Historiography in the Paradigmatic Dimension: The Search for Consensus
- Authors: Trofimov A.V.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Ural State University of Economics
- Syktyvkar State University named after Pitirim Sorokina
- Issue: Vol 5, No 3 (2023)
- Pages: 14-18
- Section: DEBATING ISSUES OF HISTORY
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2658-4654/article/view/623848
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2658-4654-2023-5-3-14-18
- ID: 623848
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
The purpose of the study. The article examines the situation in modern historical science in the context of epistemological variability inherent in key methodological paradigms (positivist, neo-Kantian, postmodern, post-postmodern).
Conclusions. The existence of various paradigms in the cognitive space represents both an advantage for researchers (freedom of choice of methodological tools), determines the existence of various discursive practices, and complicates the process of creating consensual historical knowledge, which could become a fundamental ideological basis for modern Russian society.
Full Text
About the authors
Andrey V. Trofimov
Ural State University of Economics; Syktyvkar State University named after Pitirim Sorokina
Author for correspondence.
Email: 2519612@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3419-6051
Scopus Author ID: 148819
Dr. Sci. (Hist.), Professor
Russian Federation, Yekaterinburg; SyktyvkarReferences
- Galushka A., Niyazmetov A., Okulov M. Crystal of growth. Towards the Russian economic miracle. M.: Our Tomorrow, 2021. 360 p.
- Kurilla I. The battle for the past: how politics changes history. M., 2022 Alpina Publisher. 222 p.
- Lachmann R. First class passengers on a sinking ship. Elite politics and the decline of great powers. M.: Tsiolkovsky Publishing House, 2022. 616 p.
- Lichman B.V. Worldview of modern interpretation of history: the meaning of history or the meaning in history // History and modern worldview. 2019. no. 1. pp. 9–11.
- Lichman B.V. Methodology of modern worldview about the past, history and falsification of history // History and modern worldview. 2020. T. 2. No. 2. pp. 12–15.
- Mironov B.N. A new apology for history (Reflections on the book of O. Medushevskaya) // Social sciences and modernity. 2011. No. 1. P. 139-148.
- Rumyantseva M.F., Sukina L.B. Fundamentals of the theory of historical knowledge. Pereslavl-Zalessky, 2017. 127 p.
- Theory and methodology of history / Rep. ed. V. V. Alekseev, N.N. Kradin, A. V. Korotaev, L. E. Grinin. Volgograd: Teacher, 2014. 504 p.
- Theory and methodology of history / A.I. Filyushkin [and others]; edited by A.I. Filyushkina. Moscow: Yurayt Publishing House, 2023. 323 p.
- Trofimov A.V. Conceptual images of late Soviet history // History and modern worldview. 2019. No. 1. P. 48–52.
- Khanin G.I., Fomin D.A. What does the history of Stalin's economy teach us? // World of Russia. 2022. T. 31. No. 3. pp. 155–179.
Supplementary files
