Social relations and self-presentation of the youth political leaders of Altai krai and Novosibirsk oblast in VKontakte social media


Citar

Texto integral

Resumo

The object. The article is dedicated to the research of self-presentation and social relations of the youth political leaders in VKontakte (VK) social media in Siberian Federal District by example of Altai krai and Novosibirsk oblast. This includes the analysis of social and political capital of the youth political organisations’ leaders in online environment. The goal of this research is to distinguish the forms and contents of self-presentation, the image of the youth political leaders, basing on their social relations and communications in VK. For this purpose, the author uses the TargetHunter parcer, as well as the R programming language for the open data harvesting, and Gephi program to create the social media graph. Conclusion. Basing on the research results, the author concludes that the youth political leaders actively use social media resources, particularly VK, to shape their image and promote it in public affairs. Meanwhile, the process of self-presentation of such leaders is impacted by numerous variables. It also tends to change its forms. VK is especially effective for political activity of the leaders who strive to gain their personal social capital, to create unique and high quality content, and to create channels for steady communication with their primary audience. As for the youth political organisations’ heads, their social media space is more miscellaneous and is usually subjected to clasterization, creating groups. The youth leaders also represent similar social environment. Therefore, the environment creates the leaders, as much as the leaders create the environment.

Sobre autores

Dmitry Kazantsev

Altai State University

Email: dimkazanchev@mail.ru
senior lector at the Department of Politology Barnaul, Russian Federation

Bibliografia

  1. Градосельская Г.В. Анализ социальных сетей: Дис.. канд. соц. наук (22.00.01). М., 2001.
  2. Григорьев И.Д., Билида А.А., Лапаев А.Д. Социальные сети как инструмент политического воздействия // Студенческий. 2019. № 1 (56). С. 47-51.
  3. Казанцев Д.А., Асеев С.Ю. Анализ социальных сетей молодежных политических организаций Новосибирской области и Алтайского края // Южно-российский журнал социальных наук. 2020. Т. 21. № 1. С. 64-85.
  4. Малов. Е.А. Феномен социальных сетей: акторно-сетевой контекст, теоретико-методологический анализ: Дис.. канд. соц. наук: (22.00.01). СПб., 2014.
  5. Мирошниченко И.В., Рябченко Н.А. Сетевые ресурсы развития локальной политики // Среднерусский вестник общественных наук. 2015. № 5. С. 38-49.
  6. Нгок Л.Л. Социальные сети как механизм формирования имиджа политического лидера // Вопросы национальных и федеративных отношений. 2020. № 1 (58). С. 170-175.
  7. Парфенова Ю.В. Сетевые формы политического участия в современной России и постсоветском пространстве: Дис.. канд. соц. наук (23.00.02). СПб., 2016.
  8. Рябченко Н.А., Малышева О.П., Гнедаш А.А. Управление политическим контентом в социальных сетях в период предвыборной кампании в эпоху постправды // ПОЛИС. Политические исследования. 2019. № 2. С. 93-106.
  9. Сморгунов Л.В. Сетевой подход к политике и управлению // ПОЛИС. Политические исследования. 2001. № 3. С. 103-112.
  10. Шерстобитов А.С., Брянов К.А. Технологии политической мобилизации в социальной сети «ВКонтакте»: сетевой анализ протестного и провластного сегментов // Исторические, философские, политические и юридические науки, культурология иискусствоведение. Вопросы теории и практики. 2013. Вып. 10 (36). № 1. С. 196-202.
  11. Суслов С.И. Сетевые агенты политической интернет-коммуникации в русскоязычной онлайн-пространстве: Дис.. канд. соц. наук (22.00.05). СПб., 2017.
  12. Brand Analytics. Социальные сети в России: Цифры и тренды, осень 2020. URL: https://br-analytics.ru/blog/socialmedia-russia-2020/
  13. Barabasi A.L., Reka A. Emergence of scaling in random networks // Science. 1999. No. 286. Pp. 509-512.
  14. Barnes J.A. (1954). Class and committees in a Norwegian Island Parish // Human Relations. No. 7. Pp. 39-58.
  15. Bavelas A. A mathematical model for group structures // Human Organization. 1948. No. 7 (3). Pp. 16-30.
  16. Bode L., Vraga E.K., Borah P., Shah D.V. A new space for political behavior: Political social networking and its democratic consequences // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2014. No. 19. Pp. 414-429.
  17. Boulianne S. Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research. Information // Communication & Society. 2015. No. 18. Pp. 524-538.
  18. Erdos P., Renyi A. On the evolution of random graphs // Publ. Math. Inst. Hungar. Acad. Sci. 1960. No. 5. Pp. 17-61.
  19. Gil de Zúñiga H., Copeland L., Bimber B. Political consumerism: Civic engagement and the social media connection // New Media & Society. 2013. No. 16 (3). Pp. 488-506.
  20. Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties // American Journal of Sociology. 1973. No. 78 (6). Pp. 1360-1380.
  21. Hon L.C. Social media framing within the Million Hoodies movement for justice // Public Relations Review. 2016. No. 42. Pp. 9-19.
  22. Klofstad C. Civic talk: Peers, politics, and the future of democracy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2011.
  23. Moreno J.L. Who shall survive? Washington DC: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Company, 1934.
  24. Newcomb T. Personality and social change: Attitude formation in a student community. New York: Dryden Press, 1943.
  25. Radcliffe-Brown A.R. On social structure // Journal of the Royal Anthropological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 1940. No. 70.
  26. Towner T. All political participation is socially networked? New media and the 2012 election // Social Science Computer Review. 2013. No. 31 (5). Pp. 527-541.
  27. Tsai W.-H.S., Men R.L. Social messengers as the new frontier of organization-public engagement: A WeChat study // Public Relations Review. 2018. No. 44 (3). Pp. 419-429.
  28. Watts D.J., Strogatz S.H. Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks // Nature. 1998. No. 393. Pp. 440-442.
  29. Xenos M., Vromen A., Loader B.D. The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies // Information, Communication & Society. 2014. No. 17 (2). Pp. 151-167.
  30. Xiong Y., Cho M., Boatwright B. Hashtag activism and message frames among social movement organizations: Semantic network analysis and thematic analysis of Twitter during the #MeToo movement // Public Relations Review. 2018. No. 45 (1). Pp. 10-23.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML


Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies