Legal nature and content of exclusive rights

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The article analyzes the legal nature and content of exclusive rights to the results of intellectual activity and the means of individualization equated to them on the basis of the signs. Based on the results of the study, taking into account the legislative norms and positions presented in the doctrine regarding controversial issues, the author suggests two groups of features of exclusive rights: conceptual, underlying the legal idea of exclusive rights, and optional, which predetermine the legal regime of exclusive rights. It is emphasized that the conceptual and optional features are presumed by the legislator, and the exceptions to the conceptual and optional features of exclusive rights established in the law in relation to certain intellectual property objects should be considered as an exception to the general legal regime of exclusive rights. The article notes that there is no unity in the doctrine in the list of powers of the holder of the exclusive right. The most common position is that the content of the right in question is limited by two powers: the rights of use and disposal. At the same time, scientists to one degree or another deny these powers as elements of the content of the exclusive right. The author supports the point of view according to which the content of exclusive rights consists of the powers of possession, use and disposal, the essence of which is different from the similar triad of powers of the owner.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

Roman Ryabzin

Supreme Court of the Russian Federation

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: rodinzonrom@mail.ru

Cand. Sci. (Law); judge

Ресей, Moscow

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Aganina R.N., Andreev V.K., Andreeva L.V. et al. Entrepreneurial law: Legal support for business. I.V. Yershov (ed.). Moscow: Prospekt, 2017. 848 p.
  2. Bliznet I.A., Gavrilov E.P., Dobrynin O.V. et al. The law of intellectual property. I.A. Bliznet (ed.). Moscow: Prospekt, 2011. 896 p.
  3. Boguslavsky M.M. International Private Law. 5th ed., rev. and add. Moscow: Jurist, 2005. 604 p.
  4. Vitko V.S. The legal nature of contracts for the creation of works of science, literature and art. Moscow: Statute, 2019. 240 p.
  5. Vorozhevich A.S. The limits of the exercise and protection of the exclusive right of the patent owner. Moscow: Statute, 2018. 320 p.
  6. Vorozhevich A.S., Grin O.S., Korneev V.A. et al. Intellectual property law. L.A. Novoselova (gen. ed.). Moscow: Statute, 2018. Vol. 3: Means of indivi¬dualization. 432 p.
  7. Gavrilov E.P. The principle of exhaustion of the exclu¬sive right and the right to a selection achievement. Economy and Law. 2020. No. 7. Pp. 69–75. (In Rus.)
  8. Gilev V.M. Prospects of compulsory licensing in the copyright of the Russian Federation. IS. Copyright and Related Rights. 2024. No. 6. Pp. 69–78. (In Rus.)
  9. Gribanov V.P. Implementation and protection of civil rights. Moscow: Statute, 2022. 414 p.
  10. Grishaev S.P. The Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Part four. Article-by-article commentary. SPS ConsultantPlus.
  11. Dedkov E. Suppression and prohibition of violations of exclusive rights. Economy and Law. 2011. No. 2 (409). Pp. 87–95. (In Rus.)
  12. Jermakyan V.Yu. 900 questions on trademarks: Clarifications of law enforcement practice. SPS ConsultantPlus.
  13. Dozortsev V.A. The concept of exclusive right. In: Intellectual property rights: The concept. System. Tasks of codification. Collection of articles. Moscow: Statute, 2003. Pp. 112–143; The Legal World. 2000. No. 3. Pp. 4-11; No. 6. Pp. 25–35. (In Rus.)
  14. Eremenko V.I. The content of the exclusive right to intellectual property objects. Legislation and Economics. 2011. No. 5. Pp. 15–26. (In Rus.)
  15. Zykov S.V. Atypical exclusive rights. Civilist. 2011. No. 3. Pp. 66–68. (In Rus.)
  16. Zykov S.V. The system of property rights to the results of intellectual activity and means of individualization. Russian Law Journal. 2020. No. 1. Pp. 117–130. (In Rus.)
  17. Kanashevsky V.A. International private law. Moscow: International Relations, 2006. 700 p.
  18. Kotia S.T. The exclusive right to the result of intellectual activity: the concept, essence and competence of the copyright holder. The Russian Judge. 2011. No. 4. Pp. 32–34. (In Rus.)
  19. Labzin M.V. Passively binding concept of the exclusive right to the results of intellectual activity and means of individualization. Economy and Law. 2022. No. 12 (551). Pp. 103–121. (In Rus.)
  20. Lunts L.A. Course of international private law. In 3 vols. Moscow, 2002. 1007 p.
  21. Makovsky A.L. Exclusive rights and the concept of part four of the Civil Code. In: Civil law of modern Russia. O.M. Kozyr, A.L. Makovsky (comp.). Moscow: Statute, 2008. Pp. 103–141.
  22. Merzlikina R.A. Civil law regulation of intellectual property in Russian law. Abstract of dis. ... of Dr. Sci. (Law). Moscow, 2008. 38 p
  23. Morgunova E.A., Frolova N.M. Exclusive right in civil turnover. Moscow: Norm; INFRA-M, 2021. 496 p.
  24. Nazarov A.G. The limits of the exercise of the exclusive right to the results of intellectual activity. Moscow: Prospekt, 2017. 180 p.
  25. Onoprienko O.F. Intellectual rights to breeding achievements in Russia. Patents and Licenses. 2010. No. 3. Pp. 10–18. (In Rus.)
  26. Radetskaya M.V. Protection of exclusive rights and suppression of unfair competition: A search for balance. Law. 2017. No. 12. Pp. 44–55. (In Rus.)
  27. Rozhkova M.A. Intellectual property: On the issue of basic concepts. Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. 2013. No. 11. Pp. 46–74. (In Rus.)
  28. Frolova N.M. The legal nature of the exclusive right to the results of intellectual activity and means of individualization. Economy and Law. 2024. No. 3. Pp. 53–67. (In Rus.)
  29. Shershenevich G.F. Textbook of Russian civil law. Moscow, 1911.
  30. Bender G.A. Clash of the titans: The territoriality of patent law vs. the European Union. IDEA. 2000. Vol. 40. No. 1. Para. II.
  31. Bradley C.A. Extraterritorial application of U.S. intellectual property law: Territorial intellectual property rights in an age of globalism. Virg. J. of Int’l L. 1997. Vol. 37.
  32. Burk D.L. Patents in cyberspace: Territoriality and infringement on global computer networks. Tul. L. Rev. 1993. Vol. 68.
  33. Drobnig U. Erwerb und Ubertragung von immaterialguterrechten im Kollisionsrecht. Rabels Z. 1976. Bd. 40.
  34. Geller P.E. Conflicts of laws in copyright cases: Infringement and ownership issues. Journal of Copyright Society of the USA. 2004.
  35. Goldstein P. International copyright: Principles, law, and practice. Oxford University Press, 2001.
  36. Lipstein K. Intellectual property: Parallel choice of law rules. Cambridge Law Journal. 2005. Vol. 64. No. 3.
  37. Neuhaus P.H. Freiheit und Gleichheit im internationalen Immaterialguterrecht. Rabels Z. 1976. Bd. 40.
  38. Peukert A. Territoriality and extraterritoriality in intellectual property law. In: Beyond territoriality: Transnational legal authority in an age of globalization. G. Handl, J. Zekoll, P. Zumbansen (eds.). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012.
  39. Schack H. Zur Anknupfung des Urheberrechts im internationalen Privatrecht. Duncker & Humblot, 1977.
  40. Ulmer E. Intellectual property rights and the conflict of laws. Springer, 1978.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу

© Yur-VAK, 2025

Лицензия сипаттамасына сілтеме: https://www.urvak.ru/contacts/