Two tactics to combat bourgeois historiography: S.A. Piontkovsky and N.L. Rubinshtein

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article considers strategies of interaction of historians with ideological processes, that occurred in Soviet historical science in the early 1930s. It compares the approaches of S.A. Piontkovsky and N.L. Rubinshtein. Piontkovsky is known for his tactic of active participating in these processes, while Rubinshtein follows a passive approach that involves maximizing the use of authoritative quotes.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Ilya Slepenko

Institute of Russian History, Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: otech_ist@mail.ru

graduate student
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025