Two tactics to combat bourgeois historiography: S.A. Piontkovsky and N.L. Rubinshtein
- 作者: Slepenko I.1
-
隶属关系:
- Institute of Russian History, Russian Academy of Sciences
- 期: 编号 2 (2025)
- 页面: 187-193
- 栏目: Profession and community
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2949-124X/article/view/685999
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S2949124X25020252
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EDRELW
- ID: 685999
如何引用文章
详细
The article considers strategies of interaction of historians with ideological processes, that occurred in Soviet historical science in the early 1930s. It compares the approaches of S.A. Piontkovsky and N.L. Rubinshtein. Piontkovsky is known for his tactic of active participating in these processes, while Rubinshtein follows a passive approach that involves maximizing the use of authoritative quotes.
全文:

作者简介
Ilya Slepenko
Institute of Russian History, Russian Academy of Sciences
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: otech_ist@mail.ru
graduate student
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow
参考
补充文件
