Prevalence of smoking and consumption of nicotine-containing products among students of medical and technical universities (PROTECT)

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study of the prevalence of the use of tobacco and nicotine-containing products among young people is an ongoing and critical area of research. This article presents the analysis of data from the pilot phase of the study “Prevalence of smoking and consumption of nicotine-containing products among students of medical and technical universities” (PROTECT), which was planned for 2023 among students of the North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov (Saint Petersburg), Northern State Medical University (Arkhangelsk), and Saint Petersburg State Electrotechnical University “LETI” named after V.I. Ulyanova (Lenina) (Saint Petersburg).

AIM: To examine the prevalence and patterns of the use of tobacco and nicotine-containing products, attitudes toward smoking behavior, perceptions of smoking, use of nicotine-containing products, and their effects among students.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was followed. An only anonymous questionnaire survey was used as the main method of research.

RESULTS: The pilot phase involved 118 respondents from randomly selected groups outside the main study sample (mean age, 20.9 ± 2.6 years, 54.2% men). The analysis included demographic data, questions about the respondent’s environment, attitudes toward smoking/use of nicotine-containing products, and perceptions of smoking/use of nicotine-containing products. Students of medical universities and technical universities accounted for 70.3% and 29.7% of the sample, respectively. In total, 73.7% of the students did not smoke or consume nicotine-containing products. Nonsmoking students were younger than cigarette smokers and/or nicotine-containing product smokers: 20.3 ± 2 vs 24.8 ± 3.4 years (р < 0.01). The proportion of students who do not use any tobacco or nicotine-containing products was higher than that of smokers (cigarette/vaping/electronic cigarette/tobacco heating systems; 73.7% vs. 26.3%). Smokers included 71.0% predominantly nicotine-containing product users and 16.1% users that smoked a combination of tobacco and nicotine-containing products. Friends of smokers smoked more often than nonsmokers (90.3% vs. 56.3%; р < 0.01). Positive or neutral attitudes toward smoking (71.0% vs 47.1%; р < 0.05), vaping (74.2% vs 45.9%; р < 0.05), and vaping relatives (45.2% vs 18.4%; р < 0.01) were more observed among smokers than among nonsmokers. Compared with nonsmokers, smokers are more likely to attribute the benefits of smoking (25.8 vs 6.9%; р < 0.05) and believe that vapors are effective as a nicotine dependence treatment (29.0% vs 9.2%; р < 0.05) and are a safe alternative to smoking (22.6% vs 6.9%; р < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: The developed online questionnaire is simple and understandable to respondents, and the data are correctly stored, allowing it to be used in the main phase of the study. The identified trends indicate the popularity of nicotine-containing products among students, and more detailed studies are required.

Full Text

BACKGROUND

Tobacco smoking is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly about chronic noncommunicable diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, and respiratory disease [1]. Tobacco users inhale smoke from smoldering tobacco products, such as cigarettes. In recent years, a new type of smoker has emerged, i.e., a person who consumes nicotine-containing products (NCPs) instead of traditional cigarettes. NCPs contain nicotine or its derivatives and are intended for nicotine consumption and delivery through methods such as sucking, chewing, sniffing, or inhalation. NCPs include heated tobacco products, solutions, liquids, or gels that contain at least 0.1 mg/mL liquid nicotine [2]. Electronic tobacco heating systems and electronic nicotine delivery systems, commonly known as e-cigarettes, are popular NCPs. The harms of using these devices are comparable to those of smoking regular tobacco products because they also release many toxic substances. The inhalation of diacetyl, which is present in most smoking flavors, has been linked to lung damage known as “vaper’s disease,” E-cigarette and vaping use-associated lung injury syndrome, or “popcorn disease.”

Following Russia’s accession to the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and the implementation of state antitobacco measures (Federal Law No. 15 dated February 23, 2013, version of July 24, 2023, on “Protecting the Health of Citizens from the Effects of Second Hand Tobacco Smoke and the Consequences of Consuming Tobacco and Nicotine-Containing Products”), representative national studies were conducted in the Russian Federation to monitor the consumption of tobacco and NSPs [2, 3]. The Global Adult Tobacco Survey, conducted under the auspices of the World Health Organization, reported a relative decrease of 21.5% in tobacco smoking in our country between 2009 and 2016, with rates dropping from 39.4% to 30.9% [4]. In 2016, 91.2% of young people aged 15–24 years were aware of e-cigarettes, and 9.7% were regular users. In subsequent years, smoking prevalence trends among adults can be assessed using the official statistics from the Russian Federation’s Ministry of Health and local population surveys, although the data may vary slightly. According to Rosstat data, the proportion of young people who smoke daily or occasionally has consistently decreased from 2018 to 2021. In 2018, 11% of smokers were 15–19 years old and 32.3% were 20–24 years old. In 2021, these figures decreased to 5.56% and 17.19%, respectively [5, 6].

Based on the results of annual internet surveys conducted between 2019 and 2021 among social media users aged 19–59 years, the general trend to reduce the use of tobacco products and/or NSPs in the Russian Federation was also confirmed. The percentage of respondents who reported using tobacco and/or NCPs decreased from 33.4% in 2019 to 27.6% in 2020 and 26.8% in 2021 [7].

Based on telephone interviews conducted by the All-Russian Center for Public Opinion Research on July 3, 2022, 33% of the 1,604 randomly selected Russian adults surveyed were smokers [8]. Representatives aged 18–24 years (71%) and ≥65 years (81%) were more common among nonsmokers. Between 2009 and 2022, the proportion of smokers aged 18–24 years decreased by 1.7 times, i.e., from 48% to 29%. In addition, the proportion of young people smoking more than one pack of cigarettes per day decreased from 22% to 12%.

The data presented demonstrate a steady decline in the prevalence of traditional smoking among the adult population, particularly among young people, despite some differences in the organization and results of the studies. It is possible to cautiously predict that young people aged 18–24 years could become agents of the nonsmoking behavior model. However, a recent analysis of the structure of tobacco and NSP users of different types indicates a concerning new trend in smoking behavior. The 2019–2020 online public opinion survey indicated an increase in the use of e-cigarettes among individuals aged <18 years and an increase in the combined use of tobacco products and NCPs among those aged <30 years. The survey found that 20.6% of participants aged <18 years used nearly all types of tobacco products and NCPs available on the market [9].

Studying the prevalence of tobacco and NCP use among adolescents is crucial for predicting future trends. In 2021, the World Health Organization conducted the Global Youth Tobacco Survey, which was a nationwide epidemiological monitoring study in the Russian Federation [10]. Based on published data, 12,610 schoolchildren aged 13–15 years were surveyed, revealing that 12.1% of adolescents use tobacco products. In addition, both boys and girls smoked tobacco (smoked and smokeless) at the same frequency (12.0% and 11.9%, respectively). In the study, 5.7% of adolescents reported smoking cigarettes, and slightly more boys (5.5%) than girls (5.7%) reported smoking. Of the boys who smoked, 50.2% reported that age did not prevent them from purchasing cigarettes. In addition, 16.7% of the adolescents reported using e-cigarettes, and slightly more girls (17.4%) than boys (15.5%) reported use. Finally, 3.5% of schoolchildren reported using heated tobacco products.

The data indicate multidirectional trends, with a steady decline in the prevalence of traditional smoking among adults, particularly young people, and an increase in NCP use among adolescents and young adults.

Smoking cessation is now recognized as a preventive measure for avoiding the development of chronic noncommunicable diseases and as a crucial component of effective treatment and rehabilitation of chronic diseases. The antismoking behavior of physicians increases patients’ trust in their recommendations to quit smoking. However, the prevalence of smoking among physicians is practically the same as that in the general population [11]. Based on a survey conducted by SuperJob in May 2022, it nearly one in five male physicians smoke (18%), whereas female physicians smoke at a lower rate (6%) [12].

Accurate data on the usage and prevalence of tobacco products and NCPs among specific sociodemographic groups, particularly young people, are necessary to analyze smoking behavior trends. This analysis will enable the timely development of measures to protect young people from tobacco and NCPs and the aggressive policies of tobacco companies.

This article presents an analysis of data from the pilot phase of the “Prevalence of Smoking and Consumption of Nicotine-Containing Products Among Students of Medical and Technical Universities” (PROTECT) study, which was planned for 2023 among students of medical faculties at the North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov (SZGMU, St. Petersburg), Northern State Medical University (SGMU, Arkhangelsk), and St. Petersburg State Electrotechnical University named after V.I. Ulyanov (Lenin) (SPbGETU “LETI,” St. Petersburg)

The PROTECT study aimed to investigate the prevalence and patterns of tobacco and NCP consumption, attitudes toward smoking behavior, and perceptions of smoking, NCP use, and harm among medical and technical university students.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The one-stage cross-sectional study sampled groups of students selected using a random number generator from common group lists.

An anonymous online survey was used as the primary method. The questionnaire was developed with the participation of staff from the Department of Family Medicine at SZGMU, Department of Family Medicine and Internal Medicine at SGMU, and Departments of Computer Science and Biotechnological Systems at SPbGETU “LETI.” The questionnaire comprised six blocks. Block 1 consisted of six questions that reflected the demographic data of the respondents. Block 2 included nine questions about smoking status and NCP use. Block 3 contained five questions about age and reasons for smoking and/or NCP use. Block 4 contained three questions that provided information about the respondent’s environment. Block 5 assessed students’ attitudes toward smoking and vaping with six questions. Block 6 included questions that reflected respondents’ perceptions of smoking and vaping and their associated harms. For medical students, the questionnaire includes additional questions to evaluate future medical strategies for treating patients who smoke. The staff at SPbGETU “LETI” created an online form for completing and saving the collected data. To reduce the completion time for students with varying smoking statuses, four scenarios were developed that reflect their current smoking status. The survey participant only answered the questions corresponding to the selected scenario by following the link. Mandatory answers to all questions of the selected scenario were provided when completing the questionnaire, preventing respondents from skipping any part of the answers. Blocks 1, 4, 5, and 6 were common to all scenarios.

The study adhered to the international and ethical standards outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association “Recommendations for Physicians Engaged in Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects” and regulatory documents of the Russian Federation on clinical trials, as per protocol No. 5 dated May 10, 2023, of the local ethical committee of SZGMU.

The pilot phase, which took place in September and October 2023, involved the use of the online questionnaire and correct data saving. Informed consent was obtained from all participants in the pilot study. The analysis included calculating the frequency of tobacco and NCP use. Pearson’s χ2 test was used to assess the reliability of the differences between categorical variables. A value of p < 0.05 was considered a criterion for the statistical significance of the obtained data.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The pilot phase enrolled 118 participants randomly selected from groups outside the main study sample. The mean age of the participants was 20.9 ± 2.6 years, and 54.2% were male. Demographic data, questions about the respondents’ environment, attitudes toward smoking and using NCPs, and perceptions of smoking and using NCPs were analyzed. All participants provided answers regardless of their smoking status. The sample consisted of 41 students from SZGMU and 27 students from SGMU, making up 70.3% of the total. The remaining 29.7% (50 students) were from technical universities. Most students (56.8%) were nonresidents. Of the respondents, 73.7% lived in apartments, 18.6% in dormitory rooms, and 1.7% in communal apartments.

 

Table 1. Distribution of participants in the pilot study according to tobacco and/or nicotine-containing products (n = 118)

Таблица 1. Распределение участников пилотного исследования в зависимости от потребления табачной и/или никотинсодержащей продукции (n = 118)

Parameter

Number of respondents, n (%)

Smoking cigarettes

4 (3.4)

Using vapes and/or e-cigarettes and/or tobacco heating systems

22 (18.6)

Using cigarettes, vapes, and/or e-cigarettes and/or tobacco heating systems

5 (4.2)

 

Moreover, 73.7% of the respondents did not smoke or consume NCPs. Nonsmoking students were significantly younger than smoking ones (20.3 ± 2.2 vs 24.8 ± 3.4 years; p < 0.01).

The percentage of students who refrained from using tobacco or NCPs was significantly higher than that of cigarette, vape, e-cigarette, or tobacco heating system smokers (73.7% vs. 26.3%). Table 1 presents the distribution of the pilot study participants according to their use of tobacco products and/or NCPs. Merely 3.4% of the respondents used cigarettes, 18.6% used NCPs, and 4.2% used a combination of cigarettes and NCPs.

 

Table 2. Smoking in the immediate circle of respondents

Таблица 2. Курение в кругу ближайшего окружения респондентов

Parameter

Number of respondents who do not smoke or consume nicotine-containing products

(n = 87), n (%)

Number of respondents who smoke and/or consume nicotine-containing products

(n = 31), n (%)

Statistical significance

(Pearsons χ2 test)

Smoking within the family, including parents and siblings

28 (32.2)

11 (35.5)

р = 0.91

Smoking friend

49 (56.3)

28 (90.3)

р < 0.01

Smoking by individuals nearby, such as classmates or dorm neighbors+

62 (71.3)

25 (80.6)

р = 0.44

 

Of the smoking students (n = 31), NCP users were predominant (71%), followed by those who used a combination of tobacco products and NCPs (16.1%), and those who smoked cigarettes (12.9%).

The study showed that young people are moving away from traditional tobacco smoking toward other NCPs, which agrees with previous research [7–9].

As shown in Table 2, friends of smoking students smoked significantly more often than those of nonsmoking students (90.3% vs. 56.3%, p < 0.01).

 

Table 3. Attitude of respondents toward smoking and vaping depending on smoking/vaping status

Таблица 3. Отношение участников опроса к курению и вейпингу в зависимости от принадлежности к курению/вейпингу

Parameters inducing a positive or neutral attitude

Number of respondents who do not smoke or consume nicotine-containing products

(n = 87), n (%)

Number of respondents who smoke and/or consume nicotine-containing products

(n = 31), n (%)

Statistical significance

(Pearsons χ2 test)

Smoking relatives

28 (32.2)

14 (45.2)

р = 0.28

Smoking close friends

52 (59.7)

25 (80.7)

р = 0.05

Smoking in general

41 (47.1)

22 (71.0)

р < 0.05

Vaping relatives

16 (18.4)

14 (45.2)

р < 0.01

Vaping close friends

53 (60.9)

25 (80.7)

р = 0.07

Vaping in general

40 (45.9)

23 (74.2)

р < 0.05

 

Table 3 presents the distribution of respondents based on their attitudes toward smoking and vaping. Positive or neutral attitudes toward smoking were reported in 71.0% and 47.1% of cases, respectively (p < 0.05). Similarly, positive or neutral attitudes toward vaping were reported in 74.2% and 45.9% of cases, respectively (p < 0.05). Smoking students reported significantly higher rates of positive or neutral attitudes toward vaping of relatives than nonsmoking students, with rates of 45.2% and 18.4%, respectively (p < 0.01).

 

Table 4. Participantsperceptions of smoking/vaping and its hazards

Таблица 4. Представления участников опроса о курении/вейпинге и их вреде

Respondentsperception

Number of respondents who do not smoke or consume nicotine-containing products

(n = 87), n (%)

Number of respondents who smoke and/or consume nicotine-containing products

(n = 31), n (%)

Statistical significance

(Pearsons χ2 test)

Smoking has positive aspects

6 (6.9)

8 (25.8)

р < 0.05

Smoking is hazardous to health

80 (92.0)

24 (77.4)

р = 0.07

Vapes are effective as a treatment for nicotine addiction

8 (9.2)

9 (29.0)

р < 0.05

Vapes are a safe alternative to traditional smoking

6 (6.9)

7 (22.6)

р < 0.01

Nicotine-free vapes are safe for health

9 (10.3)

4 (12.9)

р = 0.95

Smoking cessation is good for health

68 (78.2)

18 (58.1)

р = 0.05

 

In general, 12.7% of the students mentioned positive aspects of smoking, such as psychological relief from stress, image, pleasure, and making new acquaintances. Table 4 shows that smoking students were significantly more likely than nonsmokers to view smoking positively (25.8% vs. 6.9% of cases; p < 0.05), believe that vape devices are an effective treatment for nicotine addiction (29.0% vs. 9.2% of cases; p < 0.05), and consider them a safe alternative to smoking (22.6% vs. 6.9% of cases; p < 0.01).

According to a 2023 online survey, 22.6% of e-cigarette users and 30.1% of e-cigarette users agreed with the statement that e-cigarettes are less harmful than conventional tobacco products, which correlates with the findings [13].

When asked whether they would start smoking or using vapes/e-cigarettes if they knew everything they know now about smoking and/or vaping, most students (80.5%) answered, “I don’t know.”

During the online questionnaire survey, the participants did not report any difficulties. All questions were clear, and all possible answer options were provided.

CONCLUSIONS

  1. The developed online questionnaire is comprehensible and user-friendly for respondents. The data are accurately saved, enabling its use in the primary research stage.
  2. The study found that 3.4% of students smoked cigarettes, 18.6% used NCPs, and 4.2% used both cigarettes and NCPs. These results suggest a high prevalence of NCP use among students and require further investigation.

Additional information

Funding source. This study was conducted without funding from outside organizations.

Competing interests. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author contribution. Thereby, all authors confirm that their authorship complies with the international ICMJE criteria (all authors have made a significant contribution to the development of the concept, research, and preparation of the article, as well as read and approved the final version before its publication).

Personal contribution of the authors: M.A. Pokhaznikova — concept and design of the study, questionnaire development, literature review, organization of the study, surveying, analysis of the obtained data, and writing the text; O.Yu. Kuznetsova — concept and design of the research, questionnaire development, organization of the research, surveying, and making final revisions; K.V. Ovakimyan — preparation of the sample, processing of materials, and analysis of the obtained data; R.R. Fatkieva — development of the online questionnaire and information saving, sample preparation, and surveying; A.Yu. Goriaeva — organization of the study, surveying, and analysis of the obtained data; E.A. Andreeva — organization of the study, preparation of the sample, surveying, analysis of the obtained data, and making final revisions; A.E. Sychev — development of online questionnaire and information saving; A.V. Litvinova, D.S. Mamonkina, M.S. Skornyakova — surveying.

Ethics approval. Study protocol No. 5 dated May 10, 2023, was approved by the local ethical committee of the North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov.

Дополнительная информация

Источник финансирования. Исследование проведено без финансирования сторонних организаций.

Конфликт интересов. Авторы заявляют об отсутствии потенциального конфликта интересов.

Вклад авторов. Все авторы подтверждают соответствие своего авторства, согласно международным критериям ICMJE (все авторы внесли существенный вклад в разработку концепции, проведение исследования и подготовку статьи, прочли и одобрили финальную версию перед публикацией).

Наибольший вклад распределен следующим образом: М.А. Похазникова — концепция и дизайн исследования, разработка анкеты, обзор литературы, организация исследования, анкетирование, анализ полученных данных, написание текста; О.Ю. Кузнецова — концепция и дизайн исследования, разработка анкеты, организация исследования, анкетирование, внесение окончательной правки; К.В. Овакимян — подготовка выборки, обработка материалов; анализ полученных данных; Р.Р. Фаткиева — разработка онлайн-анкеты и сохранения информации, подготовка выборки, анкетирование; А.Ю. Горяева — организация исследования, анкетирование, анализ полученных данных; Е.А. Андреева — организация исследования, подготовка выборки, анкетирование, анализ полученных данных, внесение окончательной правки; А.Е. Сычев — разработка онлайн-анкеты и сохранения информации; А.В. Литвинова, Д.С. Мамонькина, М.С. Скорнякова — анкетирование.

Этическое утверждение. Протокол исследования № 5 от 10.05.2023 одобрен локальным этическим комитетом СЗГМУ им. И.И. Мечникова.

×

About the authors

Marina A. Pokhaznikova

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Author for correspondence.
Email: pokmar@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9894-5974
SPIN-code: 3387-0226
Scopus Author ID: 56801758400
ResearcherId: О-4115-2014

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, 41 Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg, 191015

Olga Yu. Kuznetsova

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Email: olga.kuznetsova@szgmu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2440-6959
SPIN-code: 7200-8861
Scopus Author ID: 24448739500
ResearcherId: O-4056-2014

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, 41 Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg, 191015

Karina V. Ovakimyan

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Email: ovakimyan@szgmu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5342-3918
SPIN-code: 5900-2849

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, 41 Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg, 191015

Rosa R. Fatkieva

Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI”

Email: rikki2@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4065-9611
SPIN-code: 3824-2789
Scopus Author ID: 57144526700

Cand. Sci. (Techn.), Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, st. Professora Popova, 5, 197022, Saint Petersburg

Anna Yu Goryaeva

Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI”

Email: ayglazova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7092-2383
SPIN-code: 8235-3853
Scopus Author ID: 56300882100
ResearcherId: D-6840-2014

Cand. Sci. (Techn.), Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, st. Professora Popova, 5, 197022, Saint Petersburg

Elena A. Andreeva

Northern State Medical University

Email: klmn.69@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3917-154X
SPIN-code: 3543-4005
Scopus Author ID: 56537990200
ResearcherId: J-7662-2017

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, 51, Troitsky Av., Arkhangelsk, 163000

Aleksandr E. Sychev

Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI”

Email: the220th@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-2224-2406

student
Russian Federation, st. Professora Popova, 5, 197022, Saint Petersburg

Anna V. Litvinova

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Email: razoom.life@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7437-1515
SPIN-code: 8301-0225

student

Russian Federation, 41 Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg, 191015

Daria S. Mamonkina

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Email: dmamonkina13@gmail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-4600-571X

student

Russian Federation, 41 Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg, 191015

Maria S. Skornyakova

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Email: skorniakovamaria@gmail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-5466-7869

student

Russian Federation, 41 Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg, 191015

References

  1. World Health Organization. Tobacco. Available from: https://www.who.int/ru/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tobacco. Accessed: 03.11.2023.
  2. Federal Law of 23.02.2013 N 15-FZ (Rev. of 30.12.2020) “On the protection of the health of citizens from the exposure to ambient tobacco smoke, the effects of tobacco consumption or consumption of nicotine-containing products”. Available from: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_142515/. Accessed: 03.11.2023. (In Russ.)
  3. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. WHO (Geneva). 2003. 42 p. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42811/4/9789244591017_rus.pdf.
  4. GATS Survey. Russian Federation. Global Adult Tobacco Survey: Brief Overview, 2016. Available from: https://static-0minzdrav.ru/system/attachments/attaches/000/036/485/original/GATS-краткий_отчет-рус.pdf?1511269867. Accessed: 03.11.2023. (In Russ.)
  5. Sootnoshenie kuryashchego i nekuryashchego naseleniya (v protsentakh). Federal State Statistics Service. Available from: https://rosstat.gov.ru/opendata/7708234640-smokingnow-2021. Accessed: 03.11.2023. (In Russ.)
  6. Zdravookhranenie v Rossii. 2019: sbornik. Moscow: Rosstat; 2019. 170 p. Available from: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/Zdravoohran-2019.pdf. Accessed: 03.11.2023. (In Russ.)
  7. Salagay OO, Sakharova GM, Antonov NS. Dynamics of consumption of tobacco and nicotine-containing products in the Russian Federation in 2019-2021. Medicine. 2021;9(2):34–47. (In Russ.) doi: 10.29234/2308-9113-2021-9-2-34-47
  8. Kurenie v Rossii: monitoring // VCIOM. Available from: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/kurenie-v-rossii-monitoring-2022. Accessed 03.11.2023. (In Russ.)
  9. Salagay OO, Sakharova GM, Antonov NS. The structure of consumption of tobacco and nicotine-containing products among the population of the Russian Federation. Pulmonologiya. 2020;30(4):453–462. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18093/0869-0189-2020-30-4-453-462
  10. GYTS. Global youth tobacco survey. Fact sheet. Russian Federation 2021. Available from: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/ncds/ncd-surveillance/data-reporting/russian-federation/russian-federation-gyts-2021-factsheet-(ages-13-15)-final_508c.pdf?sfvrsn=2b0a9d43_1
  11. Zadorkina TG. Prevalence of smoking among employees of healthcare facilities. Profilakticheskaya Meditsina. 2016;19(6):46–49. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/profmed201619546-49
  12. Kosenok A. V Rossii kurit pochti kazhdyi pyatyi vrach-muzhchina. Available from: https://medvestnik.ru/content/news/SuperJob-rasskazal-o-kolichestve-kurilshikov-sredi-vrachei.html. Accessed: 03.11.2023. (In Russ.)
  13. Salagay OO, Antonov NS, Sakharova GM. Analysis of trends in the consumption of tobacco and nicotine-containing products in the Russian Federation according to the results of online surveys 2019–2023. Profilakticheskaya Meditsina. 2023;26(5):7–16. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/profmed2023260517

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 70763 от 21.08.2017 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies