Modern approaches to classification of adenomyosis

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

This article presents a modern review of the main classifications of adenomyosis based on the clinical course, the prevalence of the pathological process, the results of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, and histological verification. The analysis is based on domestic and foreign literature, federal clinical recommendations, and results of our own research. Despite the large number of different classifications of the disease, there are still shortcomings noted in this review. Based on the available rubricators, we emphasized the need to create a classification of adenomyosis with an assessment of the clinical picture, genetic and molecular profiles, the results of non-invasive assessment methods, and a correlation with the histological conclusion. A unified classification would solve many problems in scientific and practical activities for accurate and early diagnosis of adenomyosis, identification of risk groups for patients with an aggressive course of the pathological process, selection of reasonable recommendations, and timely appointment of pathogenetic therapy.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Maria I. Yarmolinskaya

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott; North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Email: m.yarmolinskaya@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6551-4147
SPIN-code: 3686-3605
Scopus Author ID: 7801562649
ResearcherId: P-2183-2014

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Maria A. Shalina

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Author for correspondence.
Email: amarus@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5921-3217
Scopus Author ID: 57200072308
ResearcherId: A-7180-2019

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Stanislava V. Nagorneva

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott; Sestroretskaya Multiprofile Clinic Ltd.

Email: stanislava_n@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0402-5304
SPIN-code: 5109-7613
ResearcherId: К-3723-2018

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Zhai J, Vannuccini S, Petraglia F, et al. Adenomyosis: mechanisms and pathogenesis. Semin Reprod Med. 2020;38(2−3):129−143. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1716687
  2. Habiba M, Benagiano G, Brosens I. The pathophysiology of adenomyosis. In: Uterine adenomyosis. Ed. by M. Habiba, G. Benagiano. Heidelberg: Springer; 2016: 45–70.
  3. The international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. 11th revision (ICD-11). (In Russ.). [cited 2022 Dec 21]. Available from: https://mkb11.online/
  4. Yarmolinskaya MI, Aylamazyan EK. Genital’nyy endometrioz. Razlichnye grani problemy. Saint Petersburg: Eco-Vector; 2017. (In Russ.).
  5. Aylamazyan EK, Yarmolinskaya MI, Molotkov AS, et al. Classifications of endometriosis. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2017;66(2):77–92. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/JOWD66277-92
  6. Endometrioz. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii / OOO “Rossiyskoe obshchestvo akusherov-ginekologov” (ROAG), MZ RF. Moscow, 2020: 42. (In Russ.). [cited 2022 Dec 21]. Available from: https://minzdrav.permkrai.ru/dokumenty/153568/
  7. Adamjan LV, Kulakov VI. Endometriozy. Moscow: Medicina; 1998. (In Russ.).
  8. Gordts S, Grimbizis G, Campo R. Symptoms and classification of uterine adenomyosis, including the place of hysteroscopy in diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3):380–388. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.006
  9. Tskhay VB. Adenomioz. Kontraversii sovremennosti. Boli. Krovotecheniya. Besplodie. Ed. by V.E. Radzinskiy. Moscow: StatusPraeses; 2020. (In Russ.).
  10. Van den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone FP, et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(3):284–298. doi: 10.1002/uog.14806
  11. Pistofidis G, Makrakis E, Koukoura O, et al. Distinct types of uterine adenomyosis based on laparoscopic and histopathologic criteria. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2014;41(2):113–118.
  12. Brosens I, Gordts S, Habiba M, et al. Uterine cystic adenomyosis: a disease of younger women. J PediatrAdolesc Gynecol. 2015;28(6):420–426. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.05.008
  13. Koukoura O, Kapsalaki E, Daponte A, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of a large uterine cystic adenomyosis in a young patient. BMJ Case Rep. 2015;2015. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-210358
  14. Grimbizis GF, Mikos T, Tarlatzis B. Uterus-sparing operative treatment for adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(2):472–487. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.025
  15. Yarmolinskaya MI, Ailamazyan EK, Arutyunyan AF, et al. Sclerotic adenomyosis: a case report. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2018;67(6):119–123. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/JOWD676119-123
  16. Kishi Y, Suginami H, Kuramori R, et al. Four subtypes of adenomyosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and their specification. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(2):114.e1−114.e1147. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.027
  17. Bourdon M, Oliveira J, Marcellin L, et al. Adenomyosis of the inner and outer myometrium are associated with different clinical profiles. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(2):349–357. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa307
  18. Khan KN, Fujishita A, Mori T. Pathogenesis of human adenomyosis: current understanding and its association with infertility. J Clin Med. 2022;11(14). doi: 10.3390/jcm11144057
  19. Brosens JJ, de Souza NM, Barker FG. Uterine junctional zone: function and disease. Lancet. 1995;346:558–560. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91387-4
  20. Naftalin J, Jurkovic D. The endometrial-myometrial junction: a fresh look at a busy crossing. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34:1–11. doi: 10.1002/uog.6432
  21. Zhang Y, Zhou L, Li TC, et al. Ultrastructural features of endometrial-myometrial interface and its alteration in adenomyosis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7:1469–1477.
  22. Chapron C, Tosti C, Marcellin L, et al. Relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of adenomyosis and endometriosis phenotypes. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:1393–1401. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex088
  23. Khan KN, Fujishita A, Koshiba A, et al. Biological differences between intrinsic and extrinsic adenomyosis with coexisting deep infiltrating endometriosis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019; 39(2):343–353. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.03.210
  24. Tuttlies F, Keckstein J, Ulrich U, et al. ENZIAN-score, a classification of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Zentralbl Gynakol. 2005;127:275–281. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-836904
  25. Bazot M, Darai E. Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109:389–397. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.024
  26. Vercellini P, Vigano P, Somigliana E, et al. Adenomyosis: epidemiological factors. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20(4):465–477. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.017
  27. Bromley B, Shipp TD, Benacerraf B. Adenomyosis: sonographic findings and diagnostic accuracy. J Ultrasound Med. 2000;19(8):529–534. doi: 10.7863/jum.2000.19.8.529
  28. Vannuccini S, Petraglia F. Recent advances in understanding and managing adenomyosis. F1000Res. 2019;8. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17242.1
  29. Patent RUS No. 2764106 / 13.01.2022 Byul. No. 2 Nagorneva SV, Shalina MA, Yarmolinskaya MI, et al. Sposob diagnostiki adenomioza. (In Russ.). [cited 2022 Dec 21]. Available from: https://patenton.ru/patent/RU2764106C1.pdf
  30. Nagorneva SV, Shalina MA, Yarmolinskaya MI, et al. Comprehensive method of ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2021;70(6):73–82. doi: 10.17816/JOWD83066
  31. Tamai K, Togashi K, Ito T, et al. MR imaging findings of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathologic features and diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics. 2005;25(1):21−40. doi: 10.1148/rg.251045060
  32. Exacoustos C, Manganaro L, Zupi E. Imaging for the evaluation of endometriosis and adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28(5):655–681. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.04.010
  33. Champaneria R, Abedin P, Daniels J, et al. Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review comparing test accuracy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(11):1374–1384. doi: 10.3109/00016349.2010.512061
  34. Kunz G, Beil D, Huppert P, et al. Adenomyosis in endometriosis-prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2309–2316. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei021
  35. Khan KN, Fujishita A, Kitajima M, et al. Biological differences between functionalis and basalis endometria in women with and without adenomyosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;203:49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.05.012
  36. Gordts S, Brosens JJ, Fusi L, et al. Uterine adenomyosis: a need for uniform terminology and consensus classification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(2):244–248. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60201-5
  37. Kobayashi H, Matsubara S. A classification proposal for adenomyosis based on magnetic resonance imaging. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2020;85(2):118–126. doi: 10.1159/000505690
  38. Novellas S, Chassang M, Delotte J, et al. MRI characteristics of the uterine junctional zone: From normal to the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(5):1206–1213. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4877
  39. Togashi K, Kawakami S, Kimura I, et al. Uterine contractions: possible diagnostic pitfall at MR imaging. J MagnReson Imaging. 1993;3(6):889–893. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880030616
  40. Zheleznov BI, Strizhakov AN. Genital’nyy endometrioz. Moscow: Meditsina. 1985. (In Russ.).
  41. Donnez J, Donnez O, Dolmans MM. Introduction: uterine adenomyosis, another enigmatic disease of our time. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3):369–370. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.035

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. Classification of adenomyotic cysts [12]

Download (237KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2. Classification of adenomyosis based on magnetic resonance imaging and clinically relevant parameters [37]

Download (496KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2023 Eсо-Vector


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 66759 от 08.08.2016 г. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия Эл № 77 - 6389 от 15.07.2002 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies