Clinical and immunological criteria for the use of intravenous immunoglobulins in women with reproductive failures

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In obstetrics and reproductive medicine, the use of intravenous immunoglobulin remains controversial. There are no clearly developed indications for immunoglobulins therapy. The search for immunological criteria for prescribing this therapy is an urgent task

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of intravenous immunoglobulins in the complex therapy of women with multiple reproductive losses associated with changes in the quantitative and functional parameters of natural killer cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Group 1 consisted of 61 women with recurrent miscarriage; group 2 involved 40 women with two or more in vitro fertilization failures, while group 3 comprised 27 healthy fertile individuals. The activity of blood natural killer cells was assessed by CD107a expression before and after activation. Patients with altered natural killer cell activity received intravenous immunoglobulins therapy under the control of the dynamics of immunological parameters.

RESULTS: The number of natural killer cells that expressed CD107a before and after activation differed between the study groups. In patients receiving intravenous immunoglobulins, gestational complications were observed less frequently, with the incidence of biochemical pregnancy being higher.

CONCLUSIONS: In patients with early reproductive failures (such as recurrent miscarriage and in vitro fertilization failures) and immunological abnormalities in the form of altered Natural killer cell activity, the use of intravenous immunoglobulins has an immunomodulatory and clinical effect.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Alana O. Agnaeva

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Email: dr.agnaeva@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8978-3221
SPIN-code: 1130-8280

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Olesya N. Bespalova

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Email: shiggerra@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6542-5953
SPIN-code: 4732-8089
Scopus Author ID: 57189999252
ResearcherId: D-3880-2018

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Dmitry I. Sokolov

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Email: falcojugger@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5749-2531
SPIN-code: 3746-0000
Scopus Author ID: 14020604500
ResearcherId: E-9050-2014

Dr. Sci. (Biol.)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Valentina A. Mikhailova

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Email: mva_spb@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1328-8157
SPIN-code: 1749-5100
Scopus Author ID: 55598998100
ResearcherId: L-3245-2015

Cand. Sci. (Biol.)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Sergey V. Chepanov

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Author for correspondence.
Email: chepanovsv@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6087-7152
SPIN-code: 6642-6837
Scopus Author ID: 56399329700
ResearcherId: M-3471-2015

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Sergey A. Selkov

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Email: selkovsa@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1560-7529
SPIN-code: 7665-0594
Scopus Author ID: 6507854443
ResearcherId: G-2059-2014

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Igor Yu. Kogan

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Email: ikogan@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7351-6900
SPIN-code: 6572-6450
Scopus Author ID: 56895765600
ResearcherId: P-4357-2017

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Recurrent pregnancy loss: causes, controversies and treatment. Ed. by H. Carp. New York: CRC Press; 2000. doi: 10.1201/9780429450303
  2. Makrigiannakis A, Petsas G, Toth B, et al. Recent advances in understanding immunology of reproductive failure. J Reprod Immunol. 2011;90(1):96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2011.03.006
  3. Bashiri A, Halper KI, Orvieto R. Recurrent implantation failure-update overview on etiology, diagnosis, treatment and future directions. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16(1). doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0414-2
  4. Coughlan C, Ledger W, Wang Q, et al. Recurrent implantation failure: definition and management. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28(1):14–38. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.08.011
  5. Brosens I, Puttemans P, Benagiano G. Placental bed research: I. The placental bed: from spiral arteries remodeling to the great obstetrical syndromes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(5):437–456. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.044
  6. Kwak-Kim J, Sung N, Saab W, et al. Introduction of the special issue, “Clinical reproductive immunology”. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2021;85(4). doi: 10.1111/aji.13415
  7. Koopman LA, Kopcow HD, Rybalov B, et al. Human decidual natural killer cells are a unique NK cell subset with immunomodulatory potential. J Exp Med. 2003;198(8):1201–1212. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030305
  8. Beer AE, Kwak JY, Ruiz JE. Immunophenotypic profiles of peripheral blood lymphocytes in women with recurrent pregnancy losses and in infertile women with multiple failed in vitro fertilization cycles. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1996;35(4):376–382. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1996.tb00497.x
  9. Sacks G, Yang Y, Gowen E, et al. Detailed analysis of peripheral blood natural killer cells in women with repeated IVF failure. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2012;67(5):434–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2012.01105.x
  10. Perricone C, De Carolis C, Giacomelli R, et al. High levels of NK cells in the peripheral blood of patients affected with anti-phospholipid syndrome and recurrent spontaneous abortion: a potential new hypothesis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007;46(10):1574–1578. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem197
  11. Recurrent pregnancy loss evidence-based evaluation, diagnosis and treatment. Ed. by A. Bashiri, A. Harlev, A. Agarwal. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-27452-2
  12. Tang AW, Alfirevic Z, Quenby S. Natural killer cells and pregnancy outcomes in women with recurrent miscarriage and infertility: a systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(8):1971–1980. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der164
  13. Seshadri S, Sunkara SK. Natural killer cells in female infertility and recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(3):429–438. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt056
  14. Ushkalova EA, Shifman EM. A problem in the unregulated use of intravenous immunoglobulin in obstetrics. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011;(3):74–80. (In Russ.)
  15. Stephenson MD, Fluker MR. Treatment of repeated unexplained in vitro fertilization failure with intravenous immunoglobulin: a randomized, placebo-controlled Canadian trial. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(6):1108–1113. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01622-8
  16. Porter TF, LaCoursiere Y, Scott JR. Immunotherapy for recurrent miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(2). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000112.pub2
  17. Wong LF, Porter TF, Scott JR. Immunotherapy for recurrent miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(10). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000112.pub3
  18. Saab W, Seshadri S, Huang C, et al. A systemic review of intravenous immunoglobulin G treatment in women with recurrent implantation failures and recurrent pregnancy losses. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2021;85(4). doi: 10.1111/aji.13395
  19. Hutton B, Sharma R, Fergusson D, et al. Use of intravenous immunoglobulin for treatment of recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review. BJOG. 2007;114(2):134–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01201.x
  20. Coulam CB, Acacio B. Does immunotherapy for treatment of reproductive failure enhance live births? Am J Reprod Immunol. 2012;67(4):296–304. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2012.01111.x
  21. Achilli C, Duran-Retamal M, Saab W, et al. The role of immunotherapy in in vitro fertilization and recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(6):1089–1100. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.07.004
  22. Graphou O, Chioti A, Pantazi A, et al. Effect of intravenous immunoglobulin treatment on the Th1/Th2 balance in women with recurrent spontaneous abortions. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2003;49(1):21–29. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0897.2003.01169.x
  23. Chugunova AA, Zainulina MS, Selutin AV, et al. The influence of immunomodulating therapy on clinical and laboratory results in pregnant women with antiphopholipid syndrome and recurrent pregnancy loss. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2011;(3):152–160. (In Russ.)
  24. Ahmadi M, Ghaebi M, Abdolmohammadi-Vahid S, et al. NK cell frequency and cytotoxicity in correlation to pregnancy outcome and response to IVIG therapy among women with recurrent pregnancy loss. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(6):9428–9437. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27627
  25. Reed JL, Winger EE. IVIg therapy increases delivery birthweight in babies born to women with elevated preconception proportion of peripheral blood (CD56+/CD3–) natural killer cells. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2017;44(3):384–391.
  26. Lash GE, Otun HA, Innes BA, et al. Interferon-gamma inhibits extravillous trophoblast cell invasion by a mechanism that involves both changes in apoptosis and protease levels. FASEB J. 2006;20(14):2512–2518. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-6616com
  27. Uterine endometrial function. Ed. by H. Kanzaki. Osaka: Springer Japan; 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-4-431-55972-6
  28. Srikrishna G, Freeze HH. Endogenous damage-associated molecular pattern molecules at the crossroads of inflammation and cancer. Neoplasia. 2009;11(7):615–628. doi: 10.1593/neo.09284
  29. Horton NC, Mathew PA. NKp44 and natural cytotoxicity receptors as damage-associated molecular pattern recognition receptors. Front Immunol. 2015;6. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00031
  30. Tao Y, Li YH, Piao HL, et al. CD56(bright)CD25+ NK cells are preferentially recruited to the maternal/fetal interface in early human pregnancy. Cell Mol Immunol. 2015;12(1):77–86. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2014.26

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Quantitative parameters of NK cells in the blood of healthy women and women with reproductive disorders. * group 2 differs from groups 1 and 3 (p < 0.05); *** group 2 differs from groups 1 and 3 (p < 0.001), group 1 differs from groups 2 and 3 (p < 0.001)

Download (137KB)
3. Fig. 2. NK cell content dynamics at the beginning and after the end of treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins in study groups 1 (a) and 2 (b)

Download (60KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Eсо-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 66759 от 08.08.2016 г. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия Эл № 77 - 6389
от 15.07.2002 г.



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies