Prediction of placental insufficiency in pregnant women with different somatotypes

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Hypothesis/aims of study. Poor placental vascularization can lead to placental insufficiency, due to which the metabolism of nutrients and microelements between the maternal and fetal blood circulations subsequently decreases. Due to poor perfusion of placental vessels, placental dysfunction occurs. Chronic fetal hypoxia causes fetal growth retardation. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of placental insufficiency in women with different somatotypes and to develop a model for predicting the risk of this pathology.

Study design, materials and methods. A total of 390 women were examined, of whom 110 were macrosomatic, 173 mesosomatic, and 107 microsomatic. Somatometry was performed according to R.N. Dorokhov for women in the early stages of pregnancy (up to 9-10 weeks). Placental insufficiency markers (VEGF, PlGF, IL-6, and endocan-1) were determined spectrophotometrically in blood serum at the gestational age of 12–13 and 22–23 weeks using ELISA methods.

Results. Placental insufficiency was significantly more prevalent among the women of the macro- and microsomatic body type compared with those of mesosomatotypes (p < 0.05). In pregnant women with subsequent placental insufficiency, VEGF and PlGF serum levels at 12–13 weeks were lower, when compared to those in patients who did not develop pathology (p < 0.05), and the levels of serum endocan-1 and IL-6 were higher in comparison with those in individuals who did not develop pathology (p < 0.05). Using multiple regression analysis, we obtained the regression equation (formula), which predicts the development of placental insufficiency in women of different somatotypes.

Conclusion. The resulting formula allows us to accurately predict the development of placental insufficiency and to form high-risk groups among women for the development of this disease. This will contribute to the effective implementation of therapeutic and preventive measures to avert the development of this pathology.

Full Text

Introduction

Placental insufficiency remains one of the most essential problems in obstetrics, neonatology and perinatology. It is widespread throughout the world and ranges from 17% to 45% from recent studies. An important function of the placenta is in maintaining metabolic processes that are necessary for fetal development. The placenta develops during angiogenesis and vascularization. In case of any disorder in this development, placental dysfunction occurs, representing the main cause of pregnancy complications. Dysregulation of placental angiogenesis is one of the main pathophysiological aspects in the development of placental insufficiency and its clinical consequences [1–5]. Placental insufficiency alters all metabolic processes between mother and fetus, including the processes of amino acid metabolism. Therefore, the growth and development of the fetus deteriorates. The morbidity of newborns associated with intrauterine growth restriction depends on the term of the onset and severity of placental insufficiency, as well as the gestational age at birth. This causes both short-term and long-term consequences for the fetus. Thus, placental insufficiency correlates with a high risk of metabolic diseases in childhood and adulthood, as well as cardiovascular diseases and mortality in adulthood [6–9].

Many papers have been published in which one of the important roles in the emergence and development of pathology of various organs and systems is assigned to the human body type, as well as specific clinical aspects in the course of pathological processes, taking into account the body type, have been noted [10–14]. In recent decades, many scientific works have been conducted in Russia, using classification and methodology of R.N. Dorokhov for somatotyping. When somatotyping according to R.N. Dorokhov, morphometric characters are assessed according to overall component and proportional levels. The body type can be general or individual, and the terms “somatotype” and “body type” are comparable [15, 16].

Placental insufficiency is diagnosed using an obstetrical ultrasound examination (decreased thickness, premature aging of the placenta, and presence of oligohydramnios) and Doppler measurements of the mother-placenta-fetus system [17]. There are little or no studies on markers of placental insufficiency for the prognosis of pathology in women, taking into account the somatotype

Therefore, we aimed at determining the incidence of placental insufficiency in pregnant women with different somatotypes and developing a model for predicting the risk of this pathology.

Materials and methods

We examined 390 pregnant women of which 110 had a macrosomatic body type (MaS), 173 had a meso-somatotype (MeS), and 107 had a microsomatotype (MiS). Somatotyping of women was performed according to the R.N. Dorokhov’s method at 9–10 weeks of gestational age [15, 16]. We included pregnant women with no severe somatic morbidity from history, with gestational age no more than 9–10 weeks, singleton pregnancy, and with an informed voluntary consent.

We obtained serum levels of pro-angiogenic factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), placental growth factor (PlGF), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and the glycocalyx base protein endocan-1. Blood from the cubital vein was sampled in the morning on an empty stomach into a vacutainer, which contained a coagulation activator and a barrier gel. After blood sampling, the incubation period was 30 min at room temperature (20°C–25°C). Then the samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. Serum markers of placental insufficiency (VEGF, PlGF, IL-6 and endocan-1) were determined spectrophotometrically using ELISA.

We processed and analyzed data using Statgraphics Plus version 5.0 and SPSS version 15.0 software. To assess the significance of the differences in indicators between the groups, we employed the Student’s t-test, and for relative values, we employed the Pearson’s χ2 test. Multiple regression analysis was performed. Differences in indicators in the groups were considered significant at p < 0.05.

Results and discussion

The age of the study population ranged from 18 to 38 years (mean age was 27.5 ± 2.8 years). There were 233 primiparas (59.7%) and 157 (40.3%) multiparas.

Placental insufficiency was often registered in patients with macro- and micro-somatotypes compared to women with meso-somatotypes (p < 0.05) (Table 1).

 

Table 1 / Таблица 1

Frequency of placental insufficiency in the examined women

Частота встречаемости плацентарной недостаточности у обследованных женщин

Group

Somatotype

МаS (n = 110)

МеS (n = 173)

МiS (n = 107)

n

%

n

%

n

%

Pregnant women without placental insufficiency

90

81.8

158*

91.3

86#

80.4

Pregnant women with placental insufficiency

20

18.2

15*

8.7

21#

19.6

Note: * the differences between the types of MaS and MeS are statistically significant (p < 0.05); # the differences between the types of MeS and MiS are statistically significant (p < 0.05); MaS — macro-somatic type; MeS — meso-somatic type; MiS — micro-somatic type.

 

All markers varied significantly across the groups (VEGF, PlGF, endocan-1, IL-6) (p < 0.05) (Table 2). Moreover, the indicators at 22–23 weeks of gestation differed significantly from the data obtained at 12–13 weeks of gestation (p < 0.05). In pregnant women with developed placental insufficiency at 12–13 weeks of gestation, all indicators differed significantly from those of patients without the pathology. Thus, in pregnant women with placental insufficiency at 12–13 weeks, the levels of serum VEGF and PlGF were lower than the levels in women without the pathology (p < 0.05).Conversely, the levels of serum endocan-1 and IL-6 were higher compared to levels in patients without pathology (p < 0.05). It should be noted that endocan-1 is a marker of endothelial dysfunction and is released from the glycocalyx when exposed to interleukins. It is also regulated by pro-angiogenic factors, VEGF in particular [18, 19].

 

Table 2 / Таблица 2

Markers of placental insufficiency in the study groups

Маркеры плацентарной недостаточности в обследованных группах

Group

Indicator

Somatotype of women

МаS (n = 110)

МеS (n = 173)

МiS (n = 107)

12–13 weeks of pregnancy

Pregnant women without placental insufficiency

VEGF, pg/ml

27.9 ± 1.2

36.7 ± 1.3*

29.6 ± 0.8**

PlGF, pg/ml

241.3 ± 6.5

359.6 ± 4.2*

249.5 ± 5.3**

Endocan-1, ng/ml

2.2 ± 0.07

0.7 ± 0.03*

2.1 ± 0.04**

IL-6, pg/ml

1.7 ± 0.05

0.5 ± 0.06*

1.5 ± 0.03**

Pregnant women with subsequent placental insufficiency

VEGF, pg/ml

17.5 ± 2.5δ

23.3 ± 2.1δ

16.4 ± 2.2**δ

PlGF, pg/ml

166.7 ± 4.6δ

207.2 ± 5.3*δ

158.4 ± 6.8**δ

Endocan-1, ng/ml

15.7 ± 1.2δ

10.8 ± 0.8*δ

17.2 ± 0.9**δ

IL-6, pg/ml

7.4 ± 0.4δ

6.8 ± 0.2δ

7.8 ± 0.1**δ

22–23 weeks of pregnancy

Pregnant women without placental insufficiency

VEGF, pg/ml

25.8 ± 1.6

29.8 ± 1.8*

26.7 ± 1.6

PlGF, pg/ml

228.4 ± 4.9

309.2 ± 5.4*

231.2 ± 6.3**

Endocan-1, ng/ml

6.2 ± 0.8

2.1 ± 0.4*

5.6 ± 0.9**

IL-6, pg/ml

2.7 ± 0.6

1.8 ± 0.3*

2.5 ± 0.6**

Pregnant women with subsequent placental insufficiency

VEGF, pg/ml

13.2 ± 1.2

19.3 ± 1.1*

12.6 ± 1.4**

PlGF, pg/ml

108.4 ± 6.6

150.3 ± 6.4*

103.6 ± 7.6**

Endocan-1, ng/ml

26.4 ± 1.2

18.9 ± 1.1*

28.1 ± 1.3**

IL-6, pg/ml

16.8 ± 0.7

14.4 ± 0.5

17.7 ± 0.5**

Note: * the differences between the types of MaS and MeS were statistically significant (p < 0.05); ** the differences between the types of MeS and MiS are statistically significant (p < 0.05); # the differences between indicators at 12–13 and 22–23 weeks of gestation were statistically significant (p < 0.05); δ differences between indicators in pregnant women without placental insufficiency and in pregnant women with developed placental insufficiency were statistically significant (p < 0.05); MaS — macro-somatic type; MeS — meso-somatic type; MiS — micro-somatic type.

 

We performed correlation and regression analysis using the SPSS program in order to predict placental insufficiency. The analysis revealed the relationship of placental insufficiency with the somatotype of women (r = −0.77; p < 0.05), the fat component of body weight (r = 0.84; p < 0.05), the level of serum VEGF at 12–13 weeks of gestation (r = −0.78; p < 0.05), serum PlGF level at 12–13 weeks (r = −0.81; p < 0.05), the level of serum endocan-1 at 12–13 weeks (r = −0.84; p < 0.05), and serum IL-6 level at 12–13 weeks (r = −0.79; p < 0.05). This confirms the choice of indicators for the prognosis of this pathology. Regarding the significant correlation between placental insufficiency and the levels of VEGF, PlGF, endocan-1 and IL-6 in the blood serum of pregnant women at a term of 12–13 weeks of gestation and the possibility of timely implementation of the necessary preventive measures already in this period, to create a predicting model, indicators were taken in the indicated period of pregnancy. When performing multiple regression analysis, we developed an equation for predicting placental insufficiency in pregnant women of different somatotypes, which included the above indicators due to their conjugation.

PDPI = −90.2651 − (122.62 ∙ A) + (7.88 ∙ B) + + (0.39 ∙ C) − (0.11 ∙ D) − (0.04 ∙ E) + (0.12 ∙ F), where PDPI is the probability of developing placental insufficiency (%); A is somatotyping scores; B is the adipose mass of the woman (%); C is serum VEGF level at 12–13 weeks of gestation (pg/ml); D is the blood serum PlGF level at 12–13 weeks of gestation (pg/ml); E is the level of endocan-1 in the blood serum at 12–13 weeks of gestation (ng/ml); F is the level of IL-6 in the blood serum at 12–13 weeks of gestation (pg/ml).

Indicators were substituted into the resulting formula and the occurrence of placental insufficiency in a particular woman was predicted. The risk of a pathological process could be low (up to 30%), moderate (30%–60%) or high (more than 60%) [20].

Examples of calculating the probability of placental insufficiency

Woman L., 22 years old, at 6 weeks of gestation, underwent somatotyping according to the R.N. Dorokhov’s method. Anthropometrically, it was revealed that she weighs 44.3 kg; the height was 156.1 cm; the body mass index (BMI) was 18.3 kg/m2; the adipose mass was 12.46 kg (28.21%); the muscle component of weight amounted to 15.82 kg (35.53%). The patient L. had a micro-somatotype (0.342 points). In the study of serum markers at 12–13 weeks of pregnancy, serum VEGF was 21.3 pg/ml, serum PlGF was 155.1 pg/ml, serum endocan-1 was 13.3 ng/ml, and serum IL-6 was 8.8 pg/ml. According to the above formula, we obtained a PDPI of 84.7%. The pregnancy was complicated by the development of placental insufficiency in the third trimester of gestation. Thus, the actual results corresponded to the calculated PDPI.

Woman P., 32 years old, at six weeks of gestation, underwent somatotyping according to the R.N. Dorokhov’s method. Anthropometrically, it was revealed that she weighs 62 kg; the height was 169 cm; BMI was 21.7 kg/m2; the adipose mass was 15.58 kg (25.2%); the muscle component of weight amounted to 26.74 kg (43.1%). The patient P. examined had a mesosomatotype (0.523 points). At 12–13 weeks of pregnancy, serum VEGF was 28.7 pg/ml, serum PlGF was 361.2 pg/ml, serum endocan-1 was 2.1 ng/ml, and serum IL-6 was 0.6 pg/ml. From the above formula, we obtained a PDPI of 14.7%. The pregnancy proceeded without placental insufficiency. Thus, the actual data corresponded to the calculated PDPI.

Placenta formation depends on the ratio of pro- and anti-angiogenic factors. Normal placental formation occurs when pro-angiogenic factors predominate, contributing to the rapid and physiological formation of the placenta and the growth of blood vessels. Given that the placenta is a hypervascularized organ, the endothelium of blood vessels occupies a large area and has a regulatory effect on the development.

Conclusion

In women with macro- and microsomatotypes, the risk of placental insufficiency is higher compared to mesosomatotype women. The resulting formula is highly accurate and enables us to predict placental insufficiency in women, taking into account the body type in the trimester I of pregnancy. This helps to form high-risk groups for the development of placental insufficiency among pregnant women registered in the antenatal clinic, and to take timely preventive measures, which will help reduce the frequency of this pathology. The method of calculating the prognosis of the onset of pathology is simple, and it can be performed using a calculator or in Microsoft Excel.

Additional information

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding. The study had no external funding

Ethical considerations. The Local Ethical Committee of the North Ossetian State Medical Academy approved our study (protocol No. 5.7 of 08.12.2015).

×

About the authors

Kristina G. Tomayeva

North Ossetia State Medical Academy of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: tomaevakg@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0269-5507
SPIN-code: 7129-6523

MD, PhD, Assistant. The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 2

Russian Federation, Vladikavkaz

References

  1. Andescavage N, Dahdouh S, Jacobs M, et al. In vivo textural and morphometric analysis of placental development in healthy & growth-restricted pregnancies using magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Res. 2019;85(7):974-981. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-019-0311-1.
  2. Leviton A, Allred EN, Fichorova RN, et al. Early postnatal IGF-1 and IGFBP-1 blood levels in extremely preterm infants: relationships with indicators of placental insufficiency and with systemic inflammation. Am J Perinatol. 2019;36(14):1442-1452. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1677472.
  3. Тапильская Н.И., Воробцова Н., Гайдуков С.Н. Применение виферона в III триместре беременности для профилактики инфицирования новорожденных вирусом папилломы человека // Terra Medica Nova. − 2006. − № 4. − С. 15–17. [Tapil’skaya NI, Vorobtsova N, Gaidukov SN. Primenenie viferona v III trimestre beremennosti dlya profilaktiki infitsirovaniya novorozhdennyh virusom papillomy cheloveka. Terra Medica Nova. 2006;(4):15-17. (In Russ.)]
  4. Salavati N, Smies M, Ganzevoort W, et al. The Possible role of placental morphometry in the detection of fetal growth restriction. Front Physiol. 2019;9:1884. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01884.
  5. Гайдуков С.Н., Некрасов К.В., Атласов В.О. Распространенность употребления женщинами алкоголя до и во время беременности и ее социально-демографические детерминанты // Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. − 2008. − Т. 57. − № 2. − С. 11–16. [Gaidukov SN, Nekrassov KV, Atlasov VO. The prevalence of alcohol consumption by russian women before and during pregnancy and its sociodemographic determinants. Journal of obstetrics and women’s diseases. 2008;57(2):11-16. (In Russ.)]
  6. Hu XQ, Zhang L. MicroRNAs in uteroplacental vascular dysfunction. Cells. 2019;8(11):1344. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8111344.
  7. Боярский К.Ю., Кахиани Е.И. Микробиом репродуктивной системы человека // Проблемы репродукции. − 2019. − Т. 25. − № 4. − С. 27–34. [Boyarsky KYu, Kakhiani EI. Microbiome of the human reproductive system. Problemy reproduktsii. 2019;25(4):27-34. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17116/repro20192504127.
  8. Тапильская Н.И., Гайдуков С.Н. Устранение дефицита фолатов ― основная стратегия коррекции гомоцистеинзависимой эндотелиальной дисфункции // Гинекология. − 2013. − Т. 15. − № 3. − С. 70–74. [Tapilskaya NI, Gaidukov SN. Folate deficiency elimination: basic strategy homocysteine dependent correction of endothelial dysfunction. Gynecology. 2013;15(3):70-74. (In Russ.)]
  9. Боярский К.Ю., Гайдуков С.Н., Леонченко В.В. Причины прерывания беременности после ЭКО и ИКСИ в первом триместре: анализ клинических и цитогенетических данных // Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. − 2008. − Т. 57. − № 4. − С. 73–75. [Boyarsky KYu, Gaidukov SN, Leonchenko VV. The causes of arrested IVF and ICSI pregnancies in the first trimester: analysis of clinical and cytogenetic data. Journal of obstetrics and women’s diseases. 2008;57(4):73-75. (In Russ.)]
  10. Томаева К.Г., Гайдуков С.Н. Течение беременности и родов у женщин с различными соматотипами // Вестник педиатрической академии. − 2009. − № 8. − С. 95–96. [Tomaeva KG, Gaidukov SN. Techenie beremennosti i rodov u zhenshchin s razlichnymi somatotipami. Vestnik pediatricheskoy akademii. 2009;(8):95-96. (In Russ.)]
  11. Томаева К.Г., Гайдуков С.Н., Комиссарова Е.Н. Имеет ли значение определение соматотипа беременной женщины при прогнозе состояния внутриутробного плода? // Педиатр. − 2011. − Т. 2. − № 4. − С. 16–18. [Tomaeva KG, Gaidukov SN, Komissarova EN. Does value the determination of the somatotype pregnant women in predicting the state of the intrauterine fetus? Pediatrician. 2011;2(4):16-18. (In Russ.)]
  12. Томаева К.Г., Гайдуков С.Н. Изучение модели прогнозирования риска развития преэклампсии у женщин с разными соматотипами // Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. − 2019. − Т.68. − № 6. − С. 65–72. [Tomaeva KG, Gaydukov SN. A model for predicting the risk of preeclampsia in women with different somatotypes. Journal of obstetrics and women’s diseases. 2019;68(6):65-72. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD68665-72.
  13. Комиссарова Е.Н., Панасюк Т.В. Особенности биологической зрелости детей в зависимости от соматотипа // Морфология. − 2009. − Т. 136. − № 4. − С. 79. [Komissarova EN, Panasyuk TV. Osobennosti biologicheskoy zrelosti detey v zavisimosti ot somatotipa. Morphology. 2009;136(4):79. (In Russ.)]
  14. Панасюк Т.В., Комиссарова Е.Н., Нгуен В.Т. Физическое развитие детей Вьетнама младшего школьного возраста, проживающих в городе и сельской местности // Морфология. – 2012. – Т. 141. – № 3. – С. 80. [Panasyuk TV, Komissarova EN, Nguen VT. Fizicheskoye razvitiye detey V’yetnama mladshego shkol’nogo vozrasta, prozhivayushchikh v gorode i sel’skoy mestnosti. Morphology. 2012;141(3):80. (In Russ.)]
  15. Дорохов Р.Н. Опыт использования оригинальной метрической схемы соматотипирования в спортивно-морфологических исследованиях // Теория и практика физической культуры. – 1991. – № 1. – С. 14−20. [Dorohov RN. Opyt ispol’zovaniya original’noy metricheskoy skhemy somatotipirovaniya v sportivno-morfologicheskikh issledovaniyakh. Teoriya i pracktika fizicheskoy kultury. 1991;(1):14-20. (In Russ.)]
  16. Дорохов Р.Н., Чернова В.Н., Бубненкова О.М. Характер распределения жировой массы тела лиц различного возраста мужского и женского пола // Ученые записки университета им. П.Ф. Лесгафта. − 2015. − № 9. − С. 91–96. [Dorokhov RN, Chernova VN, Bubnenkova OM. Nature of distribution of fatty body weight among the people at various ages both male and female. Uchenye zapiski universiteta im. P.F. Lesgafta. 2015;(9):91-96. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.5930/issn.1994-4683.2015.09.127.p91-96.
  17. Савельева Г.М., Сухих Г.Т., Серов В.Н., Радзинский В.Е. Акушерство: национальное руководство. – 2-е изд. – М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2018. – 1088 с. [Savel’eva GM, Sukhikh GT, Serov VN, Radzinskiy VE. Akusherstvo: natsional’noe rukovodstvo. 2nd ed. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2018. 1088 p. (In Russ.)]
  18. Szpera-Gozdziewicz A, Kosicka K, Gozdziewicz T, et al. Maternal serum endocan concentration in pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth restriction. Reprod Sci. 2019;26(3):370-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/193371911 8773480.
  19. Kucukbas GN, Kara O, Yüce D, Uygur D. Maternal plasma endocan levels in intrauterine growth restriction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2020.1749591.
  20. Александрович Ю.С., Гордеев В.И. Оценочные и прогностические шкалы в медицине критических состояний. – СПб.: ЭЛБИ, 2015. – 320 с. [Aleksandrovich YuS, Gordeev VI. Otsenochnye i prognosticheskie shkaly v meditsine kriticheskikh sostoyaniy. Saint Petersburg: ELBI; 2015. 320 p. (In Russ.)]

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2020 Tomayeva K.G.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 66759 от 08.08.2016 г. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия Эл № 77 - 6389
от 15.07.2002 г.



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies