Urological complications in obstetrics

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Urinary tract injury is a rare but severe complication during abdominal delivery. Over the past quarter of the last century, the frequency of abdominal delivery in Russia has more than tripled due to the increase in the number of pregnant women at high risk for the development of maternal and perinatal complications. Intraoperative diagnosis of urinary tract injuries allows timely treatment with better postoperative outcomes. Given the high percentage of caesarean sections in many countries, the risk of the above complications remains high. Risk factors for urinary tract injury during cesarean section are an increase in women’s average age and body mass index, high parity, the presence of adhesions, prior cesarean section, emergency cesarean section, and cesarean section in the second stage of labor. This article discusses several clinical cases on the development of urological complications in obstetrics and gynecology. Due to modern progress in the field of operative obstetrics, vesicouterine fistulas caused by obstetric causes may not occur as often as in the last century. Nevertheless, even despite this, one should not forget about elementary preventive measures in operative delivery, especially in such obstetric situations as placental ingrowth, bleeding, hematoma, and parametria.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Ilnur I. Musin

Bashkir State University

Email: ilnur-musin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5520-5845
SPIN-code: 4829-1179

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, Ufa

Edvard A. Berg

Bashkir State University

Email: nucleardeer@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2028-7796
SPIN-code: 5899-0116

MD

Russian Federation, Ufa

Ruslan I. Safiullin

Bashkir State University

Email: russafiullin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3379-5853
SPIN-code: 4856-0349

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, Ufa

Marat F. Urmantsev

Bashkir State University

Email: urmantsev85@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4657-6625
SPIN-code: 3506-7753

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, Ufa

Dina F. Absalyamova

City Clinical Hospital of the Demsky District of the city of Ufa

Email: absdina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6286-5307
SPIN-code: 3379-2595

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Ufa

Yulia N. Fatkullina

Bashkir State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: ilnur-musin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0958-7891
SPIN-code: 9410-6532

MD

Russian Federation, Ufa

Ksenia N. Yashchuk

Bashkir State University

Email: ag2@bashgmu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8285-6536
SPIN-code: 8746-1180
Russian Federation, Ufa

References

  1. Bujanova SN, Yudina NV, Barto RA. Rare complications of caesarean section. Rossijskij vestnik akushera-ginekologa. 2018;18(3):83−87. (In Russ.)
  2. Stemming the global caesarean section epidemic. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1279. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32394-8
  3. Sandall J, TribeRM, Avery L, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1349−1357. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5
  4. Phipps MG, Watabe B, Clemons JL, et al. Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(1):156−160. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000149150.93552.78
  5. Kan DV. Rukovodstvo po akusherskoj i ginekologicheskoj urologii. Moscow: Medicina; 1978. (In Russ.)
  6. Gungorduk K, Asicioglu O, Celikkol O, et al. Iatrogenic bladder injuries during caesarean delivery: a case control study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;30(7):667−670. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2010.486086
  7. Rajasekar D, Hall M. Urinary tract injuries during obstetric intervention. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104(6):731−734. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11986.x
  8. Rao D, Yu H, Zhu H, Duan P. The diagnosis and treatment of iatrogenic ureteral and bladder injury caused by traditional gynaecology and obstetrics operation. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285(3):763−765. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-2075-7
  9. Nawaz FH, Khan ZE, Rizvi J. Urinary tract injuries during obstetrics and gynaecological surgical procedures at the Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi, Pakistan: a 20-year review. Urol Int. 2007;78(2):106−111. doi: 10.1159/000098065
  10. Ustunsoz B, Ugurel S, Duru NK, et al. Percutaneous management of ureteral injuries that are diagnosed late after cesarean section. Korean J Radiol. 2008;9(4):348−353. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2008.9.4.348
  11. Modina P, Vida L, David CI, et al. Spontaneous bladder rupture: Laparoscopic management of rare complications after nontraumatic vaginal delivery. Urol Case Rep. 2020;33:101377. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101377
  12. Parker H, Hoonpongsimanont W, Vaca F, Lotfipour S. Spontaneous bladder rupture in association with alcoholic binge: a case report and review of the literature. J Emerg Med. 2009;37(4):386−389. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.03.049
  13. Farahzadi A, Mohammadipour S. A late presentation of spontaneous bladder rupture during labor. Urol Case Rep. 2016;8:24−25. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2016.05.007
  14. Wandabwa J, Otim T, Kiondo P. Spontaneous rupture of bladder in puerperium. Afr Health Sci. 2004;4(2):138−139.
  15. Heyns CF, Rimington PD. Recurrent spontaneous bladder rupture. A case report. S Afr Med J. 1989;75(9):445−446.
  16. Safrai M, Stern S, Gofrit ON, et al. Urinary tract injuries during cesarean delivery: long-term outcome and management. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;1−8. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1828336
  17. Peeker R. Is there a need for urologist assistance in the management of abnormally invasive placenta? Scand J Urol. 2018;52(3):236. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2018.1443974
  18. Tam KB, Dozier J, Martin JN Jr. Approaches to reduce urinary tract injury during management of placenta accreta, increta, and percreta: a systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(4):329−334. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.576720
  19. Krasnopol’skij VI, Logutova LS, Bujanova SN. Reproduktivnye problemy operirovannoj matki. Moscow: Miklosh; 2006. (In Russ.)
  20. Krasnopol’skij VI, Bujanova SN. Genital’nye svishhi. Moscow: MEDpress; 2016. (In Russ.)
  21. Arora P, Mullan C, Lawton V. Post-caesarean vesico-uterine fistula leading to puerperal sepsis. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;30(4):415. doi: 10.3109/01443611003759265
  22. Sultana CJ, Goldberg J, Aizenman L, Chon JK. Vesicouterine fistula after uterine artery embolization: a case report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(6):1726−1727. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.128989
  23. Porcaro AB, Zicari M, Zecchini Antoniolli S, et al. Vesicouterine fistulas following cesarean section: report on a case, review and update of the literature. Int Urol Nephrol. 2002;34(3):335−344. doi: 10.1023/a:1024443822378
  24. Shekar PA, Reddy D, Pal BC, Gopalakrishnan G. An unusual cause of female urinary incontinence following obstetric trauma. Urology. 2021;148:e3−e5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.11.049
  25. Khasanov AA. Diagnosis, prevention and organ-preserving method of delivery in pregnant women with placenta accrete. Kazan medical journal. 2016;97(4):477−485. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17750/KMJ2015-477
  26. Patent RF na izobretenie No. 2578183/ 20.03.2016. Bjul. No. 8. Kurcer MA, Savel’eva GM, Breslav IJu. Sposob konservativnogo hirurgicheskogo lechenija pri rodorazreshenii pacientok s vrastaniem placenty. (In Russ.). [cited 24 Sept 2021]. Available at: https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000224_000128_0002578183_20160320_C1_RU/
  27. Patent RF na izobretenie No. 2626984 / 02.08.2017. Bjul. No. 22. Shmakov RG, Chup-rynin VD, Vinickij AA. Sposob dvuhurovnego gemostaza pri vypolnenii organosohranjajushhego operativnogo rodorazreshenija u pacientok s vrastaniem placenty. (In Russ.). [cited 24 Sept 2021]. Available at: https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000224_000128_0002626984_20170802_C1_RU/

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Corporeal cesarean section with placental ingrowth

Download (161KB)
3. Fig. 2. Cesarean section with a bottom transection of the uterus by Fritsch with placental ingrowth

Download (120KB)
4. Fig. 3. Dense attachment of blood vessels to the bladder wall with placental ingrowth

Download (107KB)
5. Fig. 4. Separation of the bladder from the lower uterus segment with placental ingrowth in the horizontal direction

Download (176KB)
6. Fig. 5. Magnetic resonance imaging, a presentation of placental ingrowth

Download (92KB)

Copyright (c) 2021 Eсо-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 66759 от 08.08.2016 г. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия Эл № 77 - 6389
от 15.07.2002 г.



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies