Prospects for preconception genetic screening at the pregnancy planning stage

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

To date, the active introduction of genetic technologies into practical medicine continues in the healthcare sector. The number of genetic diseases is growing, for which different gene therapy and targeted therapy options are emerging. At the same time, the genetic burden in the population is also increasing. The only way to reduce it is the universal introduction of primary preventive programs, the most significant of which is preconception screening, or carrier screening of monogenic diseases. In this review article, various options for preconception screening are considered in detail and the main categories of people for whom such a survey is indicated are identified. The latter are high school students, couples registering a marriage, couples planning a pregnancy, women in early pregnancy, relatives of family members of adolescents with established disabilities, as well as donors of sperm or eggs used in IVF cycles. A detailed historical perspective and examples of various international carrier screening programs for genetic diseases are given in this review. Our analysis shows that sequential testing for monogenic diseases is an appropriate screening strategy (the woman shall be examined first). As part of the screening, the ethnic composition of the population should be taken into account. However, in the case of a mixed population and a high frequency of migration, it is preferable to use an expanded panel that includes the most frequent diseases characteristic of the nationalities inhabiting a certain region. The best results are achieved with mandatory or almost mandatory screening. This review shows the main steps that have been taken in the Russian Federation over the past two years and describes the programs of the Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott, Saint Petersburg, Russia. These include free screening programs for family members and relatives of patients with the most common diseases and couples with reproductive loss, as well as a carrier screening program for six major diseases at the expense of the patient. The summary part provides an assessment of the prospects for the practical use of carrier screening in the general population and high-risk groups, as well as for donors of reproductive material, in Russia.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Andrey S. Glotov

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Author for correspondence.
Email: anglotov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7465-4504
SPIN-code: 1406-0090

Dr. Sci. (Biol.)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Yulia A. Nasykhova

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Email: yulnasa@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3543-4963
SPIN-code: 9661-9416

Cand. Sci. (Biol.)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Natalya M. Dvoynova

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Email: 1.cosulya@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1536-9527
SPIN-code: 5680-8954
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Olesya N. Bespalova

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Email: shiggerra@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6542-5953
SPIN-code: 4732-8089

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Igor Yu. Kogan

The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott

Email: ikogan@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7351-6900
SPIN-code: 6572-6450

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Fridman H, Yntema HG, Mägi R, et al. The landscape of autosomal-recessive pathogenic variants in European populations reveals phenotype-specific effects. Am J Hum Genet. 2021;108(4):608–619. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.03.004
  2. Rezolyutsiya ekspertov v oblasti meditsinskoy genetiki, chlenov Rossiyskogo obshchestva meditsinskikh genetikov. Kruglyy stol “Opredelenie chetkikh kriteriev otbora zabolevaniy dlya skrininga nositel’stva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i kriteriev dlya opredeleniya kruga lits vysokogo riska, dlya kotorykh takoe testirovanie pokazano”. 2023 Jul 23. Saint-Petersburg; 2023. (In Russ.) [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available from: https://ott.ru/files/news/conferences/2023/20230623_krugliy_stol/resoluciya.pdf
  3. Prikaz Ministerstva zdravookhraneniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 21.04.2022 No. 274n “Ob utverzhdenii Poryadka okazaniya meditsinskoy pomoshchi patsientam s vrozhdennymi i (ili) nasledstvennymi zabolevaniyami”. (In Russ.) [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available from: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202207130023.
  4. Artemyeva SB, Papina YuO, Shidlovskaya OA, et al. Experience of using gene replacement therapy with Zolgensma® (onasemnogene abeparvovec) in real clinical practice in Russia. Neuromuscular Diseases. 2022;12(1):29–38. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17650/2222-8721-2022-12-1-29-38
  5. Rubrikator klinicheskikh rekomendatsiy Ministerstva zdravookhraneniya RF [Internet]. Progressiruyushchaya myshechnaya distrofiya Dyushenna. Progressiruyushchaya myshechnaya distrofiya Bekkera (In Russ.) [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available from: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/773_1
  6. Baranova EE, Zobkova GYu, Vorontsova MV, et al. Ethical issues of genome screening: review. Medical Genetics. 2021;20(5):3–14. (In Russ.) doi: 10.25557/2073-7998.2021.05.3-14
  7. Gregg AR, Aarabi M, Klugman S, et al. Screening for autosomal recessive and X-linked conditions during pregnancy and preconception: a practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2021;23(10):1793–1806. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01203-z
  8. Delatycki MB, Alkuraya F, Archibald A, et al. International perspectives on the implementation of reproductive carrier screening. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2020;40(3):301–310. doi: 10.1002/pd.5611
  9. Singer A, Sagi-Dain L. Impact of a national genetic carrier-screening program for reproductive purposes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(6):802–808. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13858
  10. Dor Yeshorim [Internet]. What we test for [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available from: https://doryeshorim.org/tests/
  11. Ministry of Health, State of Israel [Internet]. Recommendations for screening tests in the population aimed at identifying couples at risk of bearing children with severe genetic diseases [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available from: https://www.health.gov.il/English/Topics/Genetics/checks/Pages/GeneticTestingRecommendations.aspx
  12. Greenberg R, Aharonov-Majar E, Isakov O, et al. Carrier screening program for BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic variants among Ashkenazi Jewish women in Israel: an observational study. Genet Med Open. 2023;1(1). doi: 10.1016/j.gimo.2023.100824
  13. Archibald AD, McClaren BJ, Caruana J, et al. The Australian Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening Project (Mackenzie’s mission): design and implementation. JPM. 2022;12(11):1781. doi: 10.3390/jpm12111781
  14. Delatycki MB, Laing NG, Moore SJ, et al. Preconception and antenatal carrier screening for genetic conditions: the critical role of general practitioners. Aust J Gen Pract. 2019;48(3):106–110. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-10-18-4725
  15. Australian Clinical Labs [Internet]. Genetic Carrier Screening [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available from: https://antenatal.clinicallabs.com.au/patient/carrier-screening
  16. Angastiniotis M, Kyriakidou S, Hadjiminas M. The Cyprus thalassemia control program. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1988;23(5B):417–432.
  17. Kountouris P, Kousiappa I, Papasavva T, et al. The molecular spectrum and distribution of haemoglobinopathies in Cyprus: a 20-year retrospective study. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1). doi: 10.1038/srep26371
  18. Halim-Fikri BH, Lederer CW, Baig AA, et al. Global globin network consensus paper: classification and stratified roadmaps for improved thalassaemia care and prevention in 32 countries. JPM. 2022;12(4):552. doi: 10.3390/jpm12040552
  19. Rowe CA, Wright CF. Expanded universal carrier screening and its implementation within a publicly funded healthcare service. J Community Genet. 2020;11(1):21–38. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00443-6
  20. Cao A, Cossu P, Falchi AM, et al. Antenatal diagnosis of thalassemia major in Sardinia. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1985;445(1):380–392. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1985.tb17208.x
  21. Vukovic V, Calabrò G, Agodi A, et al. Health technology assessment of the genetic tests for cystic fibrosis carrier screening in Italy. GIHTAD. 2018;11(1) [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available from: https://springerhealthcare.it/GIHTAD/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/4-GIHTAD-Supplemento-1.pdf
  22. Amato A, Cappabianca MP, Lerone M, et al. Carrier screening for inherited haemoglobin disorders among secondary school students and young adults in Latium, Italy. J Community Genet. 2014;5(3):265–268. doi: 10.1007/s12687-013-0171-z
  23. Castellani C, Picci L, Tridello G, et al. Cystic fibrosis carrier screening effects on birth prevalence and newborn screening. Genetics in Medicine. 2016;18(2):145–151. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.68
  24. Mosconi P, Colombo C, Roberto A, et al. Deciding on cystic fibrosis carrier screening: three citizens’ juries and an online survey. European Journal of Public Health. 2018;28(5):973–977. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky032
  25. Picci L, Cameran M, Marangon O, et al. A 10-year large-scale cystic fibrosis carrier screening in the Italian population. J Cyst Fibrosis. 2010;9(1):29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2009.10.003
  26. Coiana A, Faa’ V, Carta D, et al. Preconceptional identification of cystic fibrosis carriers in the Sardinian population: a pilot screening program. J Cyst Fibrosis. 2011;10(3):207–211. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2011.02.006
  27. University Medical Center Groningen [Internet]. Dragerschapstest [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available from: https://www.umcg.nl/-/dragerschapstest
  28. Mathijssen IB, Henneman L, Van Eeten-Nijman JMC, et al. Targeted carrier screening for four recessive disorders: High detection rate within a founder population. Eur J Med Genet. 2015;58(3):123–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2015.01.004
  29. Holtkamp KCA, Henneman L, Gille JJP, et al. Direct-to-consumer carrier screening for cystic fibrosis via a hospital website: a 6-year evaluation. J Community Genet. 2019;10(2):249–257. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-0388-y
  30. Gosadi IM. National screening programs in Saudi Arabia: Overview, outcomes, and effectiveness. Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2019;12(5):608–614. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2019.06.001
  31. Monies D, Abouelhoda M, Assoum M, et al. Lessons learned from large-scale, first-tier clinical exome sequencing in a highly consanguineous population. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;104(6):1182–1201. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.04.011
  32. AlHamdan NA, AlMazrou YY, AlSwaidi FM, et al. Premarital screening for thalassemia and sickle cell disease in Saudi Arabia. Genet Med. 2007;9(6):372–377. doi: 10.1097/gim.0b013e318065a9e8
  33. Line Genomics [Internet]. World of genomics: the kingdom of Saudi Arabia [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available from: https://frontlinegenomics.com/world-of-genomics-the-kingdom-of-saudi-arabia/
  34. Greengross P, Hickman M, Gill M, et al. Outcomes of universal antenatal screening for haemoglobinopathies. J Med Screen. 1999;6(1):3–10. doi: 10.1136/jms.6.1.3
  35. Front Line Genomics [Internet]. World of genomics: USA [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available from: https://frontlinegenomics.com/world-of-genomics-usa/
  36. Committee Opinion No. 691: Carrier Screening for Genetic Conditions. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(3):e41–e55. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001952
  37. Ramdaney A, Lichten L, Propst L, et al. Expanded carrier screening in the United States: a systematic evidence review exploring client and provider experiences. J Genet Couns. 2022;31(4):937–948. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1566
  38. Watson MS, Cutting GR, Desnick RJ, et al. Cystic fibrosis population carrier screening: 2004 revision of American College of Medical Genetics mutation panel. Genet Med. 2004;6(5):387–391. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000139506.11694.7c
  39. UNC School of Medicine [Internet]. A guide to your carrier testing options [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available from: https://www.med.unc.edu/obgyn/mfm/our-services/a-guide-to-your-carrier-testing-options/
  40. Xu J, Li X, Zhou Q. Nationwide-free preconception care strategy: experience from China. Front Public Health. 2022;10. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.934983
  41. Zhao S, Xiang J, Fan C, et al. Pilot study of expanded carrier screening for 11 recessive diseases in China: results from 10,476 ethnically diverse couples. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019;27(2):254–262. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0253-9
  42. Fucharoen S, Weatherall DJ. Progress toward the control and management of the thalassemias. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2016;30(2):359–371. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2015.12.001
  43. Zlotogora J. The Israeli national population program of genetic carrier screening for reproductive purposes. How should it be continued? Isr J Health Policy Res. 2019;8(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13584-019-0345-1
  44. Post release. Workshop “Prekontseptsionnyi skrining – zdorovoe pokolenie!”. Saint Petersburg; 2021. (In Russ.) [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available from: https://ott.ru/files/news/conferences/2021/20211025_genetika/post_release.pdf
  45. Obshchestvennaya palata Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Internet]. Rol’ geneticheskikh tekhnologii v profilaktike nasledstvennykh zabo levanii na etape planirovaniya beremennosti: voprosy dostupnosti i informirovaniya (video). (In Russ.) [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available from: https://www.oprf.ru/live_stream/946
  46. Glotov AS. Profilakticheskoe geneticheskoe testirovanie. Perspektivy i vozmozhnosti snizheniya chastoty tyazheloy geneticheskoy patologii v Rossii. Vserossiyskaya mul’timediynaya konferentsiya “Bio etika i genetika: vyzovy XXI veka”. 2022 Nov 16. Moscow. (In Russ.) [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available from: https://bioethics.significo.ru/main
  47. Glotov AS, Kiselev AV, Maretina MA, et al. Aftermath of the pilot project on neonatal screening for spinal muscular atrophy in the City of Saint Petersburg. Organizational, diagnostic and clinical aspect. Pediatria n.a. G.N. Speransky. 2023;102(3):79–94. doi: 10.24110/0031-403X-2023-102-3-79-94

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Genetic studies at different stages of human reproduction

Download (269KB)
3. Fig. 2. Preconception screening strategies

Download (358KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Eсо-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 66759 от 08.08.2016 г. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия Эл № 77 - 6389
от 15.07.2002 г.



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies