Organ-preserving laparoscopic myomectomy in atypical leiomyoma arrangement

封面


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

BACKGROUND: Uterine fibroids are the most common cause of surgical treatment in women and total hysterectomy is performed in most cases to radically solve this problem. The organ-preserving approach aims to preserve fertility and the ability to reproduce in patients of reproductive age. The atypical location of leiomyomas complicates the possibility of performing an organ-preserving myomectomy.

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the possibility of performing myomectomy for atypical leiomyoma using laparoscopic access in routine practice to preserve fertility and implement reproductive plans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 213 patients of reproductive age with uterine fibroids. Myomectomy for typical or atypical leiomyomas was performed by laparoscopic access. A comparative analysis of surgical treatment and perioperative management of patients with atypically located fibroids and fibroids of other localization was carried out. The results of the achievement by the patients of their reproductive goals were evaluated. The duration of follow-up was 24 months.

RESULTS: Atypical node location was noted in 65 (30.5%) cases. When comparing the duration of surgical treatment, volume of blood loss, need for analgesics, presence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, duration of hospitalization and recovery period in patients with atypical leiomyoma, these parameters did not differ from those in the surgical treatment of patients with typical leiomyoma. Anatomical and functional results of surgical treatment were analyzed after one, three, six, 12, and 24 months. Of the 70 patients planning pregnancy, 26 (37%) women became pregnant on average 8.3 months after surgery. The location of the removed fibroids was atypical in ten cases.

CONCLUSIONS: The atypical location of leiomyoma does not affect the course of the surgical and postoperative periods and long-term results of surgical treatment. The possibility of routine organ-preserving treatment by laparoscopic access in patients with atypical fibroids leaves prospects for the implementation of the woman’s reproductive plans.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Darya Ivanova

Novorossiysk Clinical Center of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency

Email: daria.andreevna1995@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-1942-7516

MD

俄罗斯联邦, 26 Sacco and Vanzetti St., Novorossiysk, Krasnodar Region, 353901

Oleg Filippov

Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Children and Adolescents of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency; State Research Center – A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency

Email: filippovolsem@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2654-1334
SPIN 代码: 4404-4584

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, University of Innovation and Continuing Education

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow; Moscow

Elena Soloveva

Novorossiysk Clinical Center of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: solovevaln@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-9442-8645
SPIN 代码: 3678-7099

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

俄罗斯联邦, 26 Sacco and Vanzetti St., Novorossiysk, Krasnodar Region, 353901

Nina Chugunova

Novorossiysk Clinical Center of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency

Email: nkc@nkc-fmba.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-3345-579X

MD

俄罗斯联邦, 26 Sacco and Vanzetti St., Novorossiysk, Krasnodar Region, 353901

Anna Uryupina

Novorossiysk Clinical Center of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency

Email: anna.petra3@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-3348-3631

MD

俄罗斯联邦, 26 Sacco and Vanzetti St., Novorossiysk, Krasnodar Region, 353901

Anna Utkina

Novorossiysk Clinical Center of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency

Email: annautkina83@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-1757-0307

MD

俄罗斯联邦, 26 Sacco and Vanzetti St., Novorossiysk, Krasnodar Region, 353901

参考

  1. Arutyunova EE, Katkova AS, Buralkina NA. Ethnogeography of uterine fibroids: epidemiology, age and race differences, types of surgery. Consilium Medicum. 2018;20(6):26–30. EDN: UZEXJI doi: 10.26442/2075-1753_2018.6.26-30
  2. Stewart EA, Cookson CL, Gandolfo RA, et al. Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review. BJOG. 2017;124(10):1501–1512. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14640
  3. Seregin AA, Nadezhdenskaia AB, Makarova AS, et al. Uterine fibroids, laparoscopic surgery and morcellation: comparative analysis of the results of organ-preserving operations. Gynecology. 2021;23(1):73–77. EDN: JQBEKV doi: 10.26442/20795696.2021.1.200561
  4. Tskhay VB, Schtoh EA. Uterine fibroids and women’s reproductive funcction. Communication uterine fibroids with infertility. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2014;6(4):42–47. EDN: TMKODL
  5. Averiaskina MN, Bakhtiyarov KR. The effect of various surgical techniques in myomectomy on reproductive outcomes (a review). Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2024;30(1):109–115. EDN: OSLGPF doi: 10.17116/repro202430011109
  6. Saveleva GM, Sukhikh GT, Serov VN, et al, editors. Gynecology. National guide. Short edition. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2020. 1044 p. (In Russ.)
  7. Carranco RC, Vigeras A, Ribeiro R, et al. Laparoscopic variants of temporary uterine artery ligation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(4):811–812. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.08.026
  8. Donnez J, Dolmans MM. Uterine fibroid management: from the present to the future. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22(6):665–686. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw023
  9. Metwally M, Raybould G, Cheong YC, et al. Surgical treatment of fibroids for subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;1(1). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003857.pub4
  10. Ordás P, Spagnolo E, Fernández LG, et al. Comparison of surgical and obstetric outcomes in women with uterine leiomyomas after laparoscopic vs. abdominal myomectomy: a single-center cohort study. Front Surg. 2022;9. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.997078
  11. Mokhov EM, Kadykov VA, Sergeev AN, et al. Pain scoring systems and their application features in medicine (literature review). Upper Volga Medical Journal. 2019;18 (2):34–37. EDN: DEYKPY
  12. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63(Suppl 11):S240–S252. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Eсо-Vector, 2024

许可 URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 66759 от 08.08.2016 г. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия Эл № 77 - 6389
от 15.07.2002 г.