Outpatient treatment of recurrent Bartholin’s duct cysts using a Word catheter: a case study

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Treatment of Bartholin’s duct cysts and gland abscesses, with the exception of small asymptomatic cysts, is always surgical. The question of the preferred surgical technique remains relevant and has not been fully resolved. Literature data demonstrate the advantage of marsupialization and fistulization using the Word catheter or the Jacobi ring over other techniques.

In this article, we report a clinical case of treating a recurrent Bartholin’s duct cyst in a patient who had undergone three Bartholin’s gland abscess incisions and drainages and one Bartholin’s duct cysts excision (enucleation). Given the multiple recurrences, a decision was made to perform fistulization using a Word catheter, which is a silicone tube with a balloon at one end and a single channel for inflation. The diameter of the catheter with an emptied balloon is 15 Fr (Ch) or 5 mm; the balloon volume is 3 ml; and the catheter length is 55 mm. The catheter is supplied in a sterile package with a disposable #11 scalpel blade, 7.5 cm long, and a disposable 3.0 ml syringe with a 22G (0.7 × 25.4 mm) needle. The catheter’s balloon should be inflated with liquid. When air is used, the balloon deflates and falls out prematurely. The catheter’s in-wound retention time is typically 6–8 weeks. The surgery was performed on an outpatient basis under local infiltration anesthesia with 2.0 ml of 2% lidocaine solution. After the surgery, the patient was prescribed antibacterial therapy with amoxicillin (875 mg) and clavulanic acid (125 mg) orally twice daily. The therapy was discontinued 3 days after the surgery due to the results of bacteriological examination of the discharge from the cyst cavity, which showed no growth of microflora. The pain was relieved within 24 hours after the surgery. The Word catheter drained the cyst cavity perfectly, causing no discomfort, with the patient’s activity not limited. 6 weeks after the surgery, the Word catheter was removed. During that time, a fistula draining the gland had formed. The patient had no relapse of the disease within 6 months after the treatment.

This clinical case demonstrates that the Word catheter is effective in the treatment of recurrent Bartholin’s duct cysts. The advantages of this technique include the following: the procedure can be performed on an outpatient basis, it is easy to perform, and it allows for rapid symptom relief and reliable and long-lasting drainage of the cyst cavity.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Dmitry S. Sudakov

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov; The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott; Femily Medical Center “Medica”

Author for correspondence.
Email: suddakovv@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5270-0397
SPIN-code: 6189-8705

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Yulia R. Dymarskaya

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov; Femily Medical Center “Medica”

Email: julia_dym@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6027-6875
SPIN-code: 4195-3410

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Kristina Yu. Ponomarenko

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Email: M.d.ponomarenko@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3060-7116
SPIN-code: 9055-5580

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Yulia S. Kuznetsova

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Email: Kuznezova22@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-5513-5036
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Basket TF. Eponyms and names in obstetrics and gynecology. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2019. doi: 10.1017/9781108421706
  2. Sudakov DS, Dymarskaya YR. Experience in surgical treatment of Bartholin duct cysts in outpatient department. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2023;72(5):129–136. EDN: NHWSDW doi: 10.17816/JOWD487950
  3. Butova VG, Ramazanova SS. Analysis of outpatient obstetric care: dynamics of the structure of appeals in connection with inflammatory diseases of female genital organs. Fundamental Research. 2015;(1–5):908–912. EDN: TWTPBN
  4. Berger MB, Betschart C, Khandwala N, et al. Incidental Bartholin gland cysts identified on pelvic magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(4):798–802. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182699259
  5. Kozakiewicz B, Dmoch-Gajzlerska E, Roszkowska-Purska K. Carcinomas and sarcomas of Bartholin gland. A report of nine cases and review of the literature. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2014;35(3):243–249.
  6. Addley S, Sadeghi N, Smyth SL, et al. Bartholin’s gland carcinoma-the diagnostic and management challenges of a rare malignancy-a case report and review of current literature. Transl Cancer Res. 2023;12(1):201–208. EDN: QETIFM doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-612
  7. Bhalwal AB, Nick AM, Dos Reis R, et al. Carcinoma of the Bartholin gland: a review of 33 cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016;26(4):785–789. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000656
  8. Omole F, Simmons BJ, Hacker Y. Management of Bartholin’s duct cyst and gland abscess. Am Fam Physician. 2003;68(1):135–140.
  9. Quaresma C, Sparzak PB. Anatomy, abdomen and pelvis: Bartholin gland. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2024.
  10. Dole DM, Nypaver C. Management of bartholin duct cysts and gland abscesses. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019;64(3):337–343. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12937
  11. Lee MY, Dalpiaz A, Schwamb R, et al. Clinical pathology of Bartholin’s glands: a review of the literature. Curr Urol. 2015;8(1):22–25. doi: 10.1159/000365683
  12. Chrétien FC, Berthou J. Crystallographic investigation of the dried exudate of the major vestibular (Bartholin’s) glands in women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;135(1):116–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.06.031
  13. Pastor Z, Chmel R. Differential diagnostics of female “sexual” fluids: a narrative review. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(5):621–629. EDN: AKYULE doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3527-9
  14. Sudakov DS, Dymarskaya YR. Jacobi ring catheter outpatient treatment of the Bartholin gland abscess: a case report. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2025;74(1):164–174. EDN: XULMVY doi: 10.17816/JOWD636918
  15. Abulafia O, Sherer DM. Bartholin gland abscess: sonographic findings. J Clin Ultrasound. 1997;25(1):47–49. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0096(199701)25
  16. Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Bartholin gland diseases. Clinical recommendations. Moscow: Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; 2023. [cited 2024 Oct 30] Available from: https:// https://roag-portal.ru/recommendations_gynecology
  17. Illingworth B, Stocking K, Showell M, et al. Evaluation of treatments for Bartholin’s cyst or abscess: a systematic review. BJOG. 2020;127(6):671–678. EDN: TNCUAL doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16079
  18. Wechter ME, Wu JM, Marzano D, et al. Management of Bartholin duct cysts and abscesses: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2009;64(6):395–404. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e31819f9c76
  19. Wheeless CR, Roenneburg ML. Atlas of pelvic surgery. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1997. [cited 2025 Jun 30] Available from: https://atlasofpelvicsurgery.org/1VulvaandIntroitus/5bartholinsglandexcision/chap1sec5.html
  20. Word B. Office treatment of cyst and abscess of Bartholin’s gland duct. South Med J. 1968;61(5):514–518. doi: 10.1097/00007611-196805000-00015
  21. Bakouei F, Zolfaghari F, Mirabi P, Farhadi Z, Delavar MA. Comparison of Word Catheter and Marsupialization in the Management of Bartholin’s Glands: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2024;46(4):102357. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102357
  22. Wax RS, Christian MD. Practical recommendations for critical care and anesthesiology teams caring for novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) patients. Can J Anaesth. 2020;67(5):568–576. EDN: NVMAKK doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01591-x

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Bartholin’s gland. a, iconic image of the gland’s structure; b, localization of the ostium of the excretory duct. 1, ostium of the excretory duct; 2, excretory duct; 3, glandular tissue; 4, Hart’s line.

Download (178KB)
3. Fig. 2. Bartholin’s duct cysts. a, iconic image; b, view of the cyst. 1, blocked ostium of the excretory duct; 2, dilated cavity of the excretory duct; 3, glandular tissue.

Download (80KB)
4. Fig. 3. Bartholin’s gland abscess. a, iconic image; b, view of the abscess. 1, blocked ostium of the excretory duct; 2, cyst cavity containing bacteria; 3, infected glandular tissue. The dots indicate bacteria, the arrows indicate the direction of inflammation.

Download (120KB)
5. Fig. 4. Samuel Buford Word, MD, Assistant Professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology the University of Alabama at Birmingham. © 2025 UAB Archives, University of Alabama at Birmingham. Distributed with the copyright holder’s permission.

Download (89KB)
6. Fig. 5. Word catheter. a, view of the catheter; b, iconic image of catheter placement in the cavity of the Bartholin’s gland cyst. 1, Word catheter with an inflated balloon in the cyst cavity; 2, direction of cavity drainage; 3, formation of fistula walls; 4, glandular tissue.

Download (157KB)
7. Fig. 6. The view (a) and ultrasound image (b) of the Bartholin’s duct cyst.

Download (144KB)
8. Fig. 7. Surgical treatment (a) and its outcome (b). The white arrow indicates the ostium of the fistula formed between the cyst cavity and the vulvar vestibule.

Download (214KB)
9. Fig. 8. Disease development.

Download (153KB)

Copyright (c) 2025 Eсо-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 66759 от 08.08.2016 г. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия Эл № 77 - 6389
от 15.07.2002 г.