Modern concepts of etiology, pathogenesis and risk factors for preeclampsia

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Preeclampsia is a serious complication of pregnancy and complicates its course in 2-8% of all cases. According to the literature, the disease is associated with an increase in maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, and is a predictor of the development of chronic diseases in the distant future, which is an important medical and social issue. Of particular interest is the study of the molecular mechanisms of etiopathogenesis and risk factors for preeclampsia, which, unfortunately, are currently poorly studied and understood, thus dictating the need for further study of this complication of pregnancy. This article discusses the current understanding of the etiology, pathogenesis and risk factors for preeclampsia.

Full Text

According to modern concepts, preeclampsia (PE) is clinically characterized by arterial hypertension (≥140/90 mmHg) and proteinuria (≥0.3 g/day) and is accompanied by edema and impaired function of various organs and systems [1]. These symptoms can occur both during pregnancy (after week 20 of gestation) and in the postpartum period (up to 28 days).

PE complicates the course of pregnancy in 2%–8% of all cases and is one of the major causes of maternal mortality worldwide [2]. Data from the Department of Monitoring, Analysis, and Strategic Development of Healthcare of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation in the Statistical Book of 2018 revealed that the incidence of moderate PE in Russia was 27.4 per 1000 births and severe PE was 8.4 [3].

Early-onset of PE (before week 34 of gestation) has the most adverse outcomes for both the mother and the fetus. Women with a history of PE are at high risk for developing chronic arterial hypertension (CAH), type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), renal failure, coronary heart disease, various forms of arrhythmias, etc. in the long term [4]. Despite the advances in modern medicine, the only effective treatment for PE is delivery regardless of gestational age, which makes a significant contribution to the structure of perinatal morbidity and mortality that are mainly caused by prematurity, chronic hypoxia, and fetal growth retardation [5].

The mechanisms of PE occurrence are extensively studied worldwide, and >30 hypotheses for the development of this pregnancy complication were reported, most of which placentation disorders are the most significant [6]. The two-stage model of PE development that was introduced by Redman in 1991 is currently generally accepted. At stage 1 of PE, abnormal placentation occurs in early pregnancy, which leads to disseminated endothelial dysfunction and “maternal syndrome” at stage 2 [7]. Generally, the mechanisms of early and late PE occurrence are different. Thus, late PE development, which was registered in 88% of all cases, is mainly due to maternal causes (metabolic syndrome, arterial hypertension, chronic kidney disease, etc.) in combination with placental dysfunction. Signs of incomplete remodeling of the coiled arteries are noted in only a small proportion of women with PE that develops after week 34 of gestation [8]. Early-onset was noted in 12% of PE cases and is associated with extensive placental lesions and a higher risk of maternal and fetal complications. A trigger factor for early PE is a placentation impairment at the initial gestational stages [9].

With the physiological course of pregnancy, the syncytiotrophoblast penetrates the endometrium at the time of implantation, which provides histiotrophic nutrition of the embryo until the hematotrophic type of nutrition is established. Then, the retrograde invasion of the endovascular trophoblast into the uterine vessels occurs, which replaces the endothelial lining of the vessels [10]. These rearrangements cause apoptosis of the muscle wall of the spiral arteries, which forms a vascular bed with low intravascular pressure that contributes to adequate placental perfusion maintenance throughout pregnancy. With PE, these processes are disrupted, which ultimately leads to defective trophoblast invasion and impaired formation of uteroplacental blood flow [11].

Early development of the embryo and placenta occurs under conditions of physiologically low oxygen levels (1%–2%), which is probably required to prevent oxidative damage to the fetus and normal functioning of the trophoblast cells [12]. Low oxygen levels stimulate increased expression of hypoxia-induced factors (HIF-1á and HIF-2á) and transforming growth factor â (TGF-â), which also inhibits the transition of the trophoblast to the invasive type. The uteroplacental blood flow intensification starts from week 10 of gestation, which is accompanied by a significantly increased partial pressure of oxygen, decreased expression of HIF-1á/HIF-2á and TGF-â, and trophoblast rearrangement from the proliferative to the invasive type, which ensures the normal uterine vessel transformation. With persistent hypoxia after week 10 of gestation, differentiation processes of the trophoblast are disrupted, which results in its insufficiently deep invasion and atypical transformation of the spiral arteries [13]. One of the mechanisms that disrupt the invasion processes is the persistent hypoxia-mediated overexpression of HIF-1á/HIF-2á and TGF-â. R.E. Albers et al. (2019) revealed that long-term expression of HIF-1á leads to the development of hypertension and renal glomeruloendotheliosis with proteinuria and restriction of fetal growth in mice [14]. HIF-2á/HIF-3á functions as an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placental growth factor by activating the signaling pathway of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1), which also negatively affects the placental formation [15].

Not only hypoxia has a pathogenic effect, but also systematically repeated episodes of ischemia and reperfusion, which are accompanied by increased reactive oxygen species production, thereby creating a favorable environment for oxidative stress development [16]. Oxidative damage to the placenta induces apoptosis processes, such as the release of various antiangiogenic factors, proinflammatory cytokines, and vasoactive compounds into the mother’s bloodstream, which develops major systemic endothelial cell dysfunction, accompanied by inflammation and vasoconstriction [17]. Oxidative stress also potentiates mitochondrial dysfunction. V.R. Vaka et al. (2018) studied mitochondrial dysfunction and its relationship with endothelial dysfunction, systemic vasospasm, inflammation, and oxidative stress in PE. They concluded that the metabolism in mitochondria is accelerated in PE, which is accompanied by increased levels of calcium ions, impaired phosphorylation processes, and increased formation of reactive oxygen species, which play a significant role in DNA and RNA damage, cell death, and the development of endothelial dysfunction [18]. Free radicals activate the process of lipid peroxidation and the synthesis of products of the cyclooxygenase pathway of the metabolism of arachidonic acid. Thus, T.N. Pogorelova et al. (2019) revealed that in females with PE, the levels of thromboxane B2 and arachidonic acid in the tissues of the placenta increases by >30% compared to that of the control group, and the concentration of prostacyclin, which is a vasodilator, also decreases by 20% [19]. Arachidonic acid metabolites are involved in the inflammatory process, and also affect the adhesion and aggregation of platelets, which leads to intravascular coagulopathy, thrombosis, placental infarction, and an even greater deterioration in the malfunctioning uteroplacental blood flow [20]. In addition, oxidative stress potentiates the inflammatory response by stimulating the proinflammatory cytokine production, such as tumor necrosis factor á and interleukin (IL) 6, as well as decreased antiinflammatory cytokines (IL-10) synthesis with subsequent cell damage [21]. Simultaneously with the development of oxidative stress, the work of placental antioxidant mechanisms is inhibited, as evidenced by a decreased superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase expression in PE [22].

Endothelial dysfunction is central to the “maternal syndrome” pathogenesis of PE and underlies the imbalance of vasoactive mediators, which induces a shift toward increased vasoconstrictor production [23, 24]. Imbalanced circulating angiogenic factors indirectly affect the formation of endothelial dysfunction and PE clinical manifestations, which form a vicious circle. An endogenous antiangiogenic factor (endostatin), sFlt1, is a potent VEGF antagonist that is significantly elevated in PE. VEGF is significant not only in angiogenesis but also in maintaining the normal functioning of the endothelium and controls the formation of endothelial fenestras (a characteristic feature of the endothelium of the renal glomeruli) [25]. Increased expression of sFlt1 (in vitro) induces glomerular endotheliosis with the disappearance of fenestras, which histologically resembles renal damage in PE. More severe forms of PE, including hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets syndrome, are also associated with a concomitantly increased level of both sFlt1 and soluble endoglin (which is also an antiangiogenic factor) [26].

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are of great importance in the formation of endothelial dysfunction in PE. MMP-2, MMP-9, MMP-3, and MMP-13 are directly related to the processes of implantation, trophoblast invasion, and blood vessel remodeling. They are involved in the degradation of endothelin and adrenomedullin, which contributes to the vasodilation of the spiral arteries [27]. A decreased expression of various MMP groups, together with increased endogenous MMP inhibitor synthesis, induces endothelial damage and increases vascular reactivity, which leads to pronounced vasoconstriction [28].

Evidence on the involvement of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in PE pathogenesis has been obtained [29]. F. Herse et al. (2013) found an association between endothelial dysfunction, increased endothelin-1 production, and activation of the expression of autoantibodies to type 1 angiotensin II receptors (AT2R1). Contrary to the physiological course of pregnancy, when low endothelium sensitivity to angiotensin II is noted, the sensitivity to angiotensin II increases in pregnant women with PE, mediated by genetic, immunological, or exogenous factors [30]. One of the potential mechanisms for increasing sensitivity to angiotensin II is the expression of autoantibodies to AT2R1 in PE women, which are produced in response to placental ischemia and systemic inflammation. Autoantibodies to AT2R1 stimulate the production of placental antiangiogenic factors (sFlt1 and sENG), induce the synthesis of the plasminogen activator inhibitor PAI-1 in trophoblast cells, and indirectly affect the activation of coagulation hemostasis [31].

Immune maladjustment of the mother’s body also contributes to PE development. The fetus represents a semiallogenic transplant (since 50% of paternal antigens are expressed in the tissues of the placenta and fetus), which is not rejected due to the functioning of a whole complex of immunological mechanisms of gestation, where natural cytotoxic cells (NK cells) are the most significant [32]. In the early stages of pregnancy, >70% of neutrophils in the endometrium are uterine NK cells with the CD56hi and CD57lo phenotype (uNK), which ensure successful implantation of blastula, and then participate in vascular remodeling through the secretion of cytokines and angiogenic mediators, their number is significantly reduced by the third trimester of pregnancy [33]. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-G, presented on the surface of trophoblast cells, which interact with KIR receptors (inhibitors) of uNK cells, reduces the cytotoxicity of NKs and limits their migration across the placenta, thus protecting the fetus from adverse immunological reactions from the mother’s body. Therefore, defects in the placental expression of HLA-G and KIR receptors may be associated with an increased risk of pregnancy complications, which are based on impaired uteroplacental circulation [34]. According to S.A. Robertson et al. (2018), T-lymphocytes makeup 10%–20% of decidual immune cells at the onset of the first trimester and are significant in the processes of implantation and placentation [35]. An imbalance between the regulatory (Treg) and effector (Teff) T-lymphocytes (bias toward Teff) may also be one of the potential immunological mechanisms for the development of PE [36]. Teff negatively affects placental development through the release of proinflammatory cytokines and the activation of antigen-dependent cytotoxicity of the trophoblast. Decidual Tregs secrete IL-10 and TGF-b and express CD25 and PD-L1, which inhibits the effector T-lymphocytes and neutralizes their effects, and also have potent anti-inflammatory, immuno-, and vasoregulatory properties [37].

One of the components of the pathogenesis of PE is the deregulation of the complement system, which is most often associated with the presence of mutations in genes that control the biosynthesis of complement activation regulators, namely factor H, membrane cofactor, factor I, component C3, etc. The complement system disruption leads to endogenous damage to the tissue structures, endothelium, blood cells, and platelets with the subsequent formation of microthrombi, and the development of endothelial dysfunction and systemic impairment of fetal tolerance [38].

The main component of the arterial hypertension pathophysiology in PE is the biologically imbalanced active substances produced by endothelial cells, which are involved in vascular tone regulation. Placental ischemia stimulates the release of mediators that cause systemic endotheliosis, which leads to decreased vasodilator synthesis (prostacyclin, nitrogen monoxide [NO], and endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization factor). Concurrently, the production of endothelin-1 and thromboxane A2 increases, which has a powerful vasoconstrictor effect. The disorders cause an increased total peripheral vascular resistance and, accordingly, blood pressure [39]. Female patients with PE have increased angiotensin II and norepinephrine sensitivity due to the activation of AT2R1. Heterodimerization of AT2R1 and bradykinin B2 receptors and placental ischemia-induced production of autoantibodies to AT2R1 receptors also enhance the pressor effects of angiotensin II [40]. Immune mechanisms also contribute to the development of hypertension in PE. An imbalance between two subpopulations of CD4+ T-lymphocytes (Th1/Th2), Tregs and Teff, and excessive secretion of IL-17 contribute to increased production of vasoactive mediators and autoantibodies to AT2R1 receptors, thereby aggravating endothelial dysfunction, which also leads to increased blood pressure in PE [41].

To date, a large number of studies have been conducted that comprise the information about 130 possible PE risk factors, covering a large list of comorbidities, biomarkers, environmental factors, and genetic determinants [42, 43]. Thus, S. Rana et al. (2019) studied the risk factors for PE development that are ranked according to the value of the relative risk (RR) and divided into several categories, where the main group of risk factors (RR > 2.5) includes a history of PE, CAH, DM, multifetal pregnancy, body mass index (BMI) of >30 kg/cm2 in the pregravid period, and antiphospholipid syndrome; group 2 of the risk factors (RR 1.8–2.5) include systemic lupus erythematosus, stillbirth, history of infertility and premature placental detachment, use of assisted reproductive technologies, chronic kidney disease, maternal age of over 35 years at the time of pregnancy, and polymorphism of candidate gene (rs4769613 of the FLT1 gene, rs9478812 of the PLEKHG1 gene, etc.); the last group of less significant risk factors (RR < 1.8) includes a family history of PE and fetal trisomy of the 13th pair of chromosomes (Patau syndrome) [44].

According to modern data, CAH is recorded in 1%–5% of all pregnant women, with an incidence of PE of up to 75%. A. Syngelaki et al. (2018) revealed that CAH before pregnancy is associated with a high risk of PE (odds ratio [OR] 5.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.93–6.73), stillbirth (OR 2.38; 95% CI 1.51–3.75), and small for gestational age newborns (OR 2.06; 95% CI 1.79–2.39) [45]. In addition, D. Nzelu et al. (2018) noted that despite the correction of hypertension with drugs and maintaining the control blood pressure values at <140/90 mm Hg. from the first trimester of pregnancy in pregnant women with CAH, the risk of developing PE and the birth of children with developmental retardation is >2 times higher. This is associated with progressive endothelial dysfunction, arteriole remodeling, and muscle wall thickening, followed by vasoconstriction and decreased sensitivity to vasodilation [46].

The most common modifiable risk factor for PE is overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2), as >10% of all pregnant women are obese. A meta-analysis of 19 cohorts conducted by X.J. He et al. revealed that obesity and overweight are associated with an increased risk of PE (OR 2.48; 95% CI 2.05–2.90) [47]. An increased BMI by 1 kg/m2 leads to a statistically significant increase in the OR of PE by 15%. The probability of this pregnancy complication increases by 30% in women who are overweight at the time of pregnancy [48]. O.B. Kalinkina et al. (2012) revealed that an increased BMI is associated with an earlier onset of PE, as in patients with normal body weight, clinical manifestations of PE were manifested at a term of 30.25 ± 0.38 weeks and manifested at a term of 26.00 ± 2.35 weeks of gestation at BMI of 35 kg/m2 or higher (p < 0.001). A direct correlation was also found between BMI and blood pressure indicators (systolic, diastolic, mean, and pulse) [49].

Hereditary thrombophilia causes the occurrence of blood clots in the placental blood vessels, which is associated with an increased risk of placenta-associated pregnancy complications [50]. G. Mello et al. (2005) revealed that the presence of at least one of the mutations FV Leiden, MTHFR C677T, and Pt G20210A is associated with a more severe course of PE (OR 4.9; 95% CI 3.5–6.9) [51]. The most significant congenital defects of hemostasis components in PE development are considered mutations in the MTHFR gene (15%–40%), type 1 plasminogen activator inhibitor (5–8%), Leiden (3%–6%), and prothrombin II (1%–4%). The combination of hyperhomocysteinemia and FV Leiden mutation was established to increase the risk of thrombotic complications by a factor of 10–20 [52]. Literature data revealed that the mutation of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T gene is an independent risk factor for higher blood pressure during pregnancy and PE [53].

The contribution of DM and insulin resistance to the formation of PE is undeniable. According to the literature, PE is diagnosed in 25%–40% of pregnant women with type 1 DM and in 20%–24% with type 2 DM [54]. S. Lisonkova et al. (2013) found that DM that developed before pregnancy is a risk factor for both an early manifestation of PE (up to the week 34, OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.60–2.81) and its late development (OR 2.46; 95% CI 2.32–2.61). This is associated with the development of systemic diabetic vasculopathy and the frequent combination of DM with preexisting CAH [55]. K. Bramham (2017) notes that diabetic nephropathy in pregnant patients with DM is associated with a higher risk of PE (35%–66%) compared with female patients with DM without nephropathy (9%–17%) [56]. In addition, insulin resistance is often associated with other risk factors for PE (obesity, CAH, metabolic syndrome, etc.) and has the same mechanisms of PE development, which is confirmed by identical disorders in the expression of various biomarkers (PAI-1, leptin, intercellular adhesion molecules, etc.) in these two pathological conditions [57].

An aggravated obstetric and gynecological history with PE is the most significant risk factor for this pregnancy complication. M. Lewandowska et al. (2020) established that females with a PE history have a significantly increased risk of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy (OR 27.54; 95% CI 5.8–130.8; p < 0.001 for PE and OR 22.90; 95% CI 7.3–72.4; p < 0.001 for gestational arterial hypertension) [48]. A direct relationship was established between the same periods of manifestation of clinical symptoms of PE in previous and present pregnancies. Early-onset PE in the history increased the risk of the corresponding form of PE by 25.2 times (95% CI 21.8–29.1), and, accordingly, the manifestation of this pathology after week 34 of gestation increased the risk of late PE by 10.3 times (95% CI 9.85–10.9). The authors attribute this to the predominant influence of genetic factors on the development of early PE and the most significant contribution of environmental agents to the formation of late PE [58].

The available literature provides data on the relationship between ethnicity and race with the epidemiology and course of PE. Thus, A.B. Caughey et al. (2005) found that the risk of PE is significantly higher in African Americans (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.25–1.62) and lower in the Asian population (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.72–0.88) compared with the Caucasians [59]. In addition, black women have significantly higher rates of maternal mortality from complications associated with PE compared to Europeans (121.8 cases per 100,000 deliveries, 95% CI 69.7–212.9 and 24.1 per 100,000 deliveries, 95% CI 14.6–39.8, respectively, p < 0.01) [60]. The ethnicity of the father also influences the risk of PE, as the risk of this pregnancy complication is significantly increased in couples that belong to different ethnic groups, compared with parents of the same race (OR 1.13; 95% CI 1.02–1.26) [61].

A hereditary predisposition is significant in PE formation. According to various sources, the presence of hypertensive disorders in combination with proteinuria during pregnancy in females with a family history in first-degree relatives (mother, sisters) increases the risk of PE by 24%–163% [62]. A study by N.C. Serrano et al. (2020) revealed that the risk of this pregnancy complication in females whose close relatives had PE history is significantly increased (PE in a sister increases the risk by 2.43 times [95% CI 2.02–2.93]), that in the mother by 3.38 times (95% CI 2.89–3.96), and that in the mother and sister by 4.17 times (95% CI 2.60–6.69)] [63]. History of CAH in the mother (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.04–1.90), sister (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.31–4.69), or all female relatives (OR 3.65, 95% CI 1.65–8.09) increases the risk of PE development by >2 times [64], and the presence in the family history of two family members or more with cardiovascular diseases (including cerebral infarction) leads to a more than threefold (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.4–7.7) increase in the probability this complication to occur [65].

Therefore, as studied in the international and Russian literature, we can conclude that, firstly, despite numerous studies, no consensus was found on the molecular mechanisms of PE etiopathogenesis. Secondly, the key role in the development of this pregnancy complication is attributed to the processes of placentation disturbance, immune maladjustment of the mother’s body, endothelial dysfunction, angiogenic imbalance, and others; however, their significance in the formation of early and late PE is considerably different. Thirdly, >130 different risk factors were identified for PE development (family history of PE, DM, CAH, hereditary thrombophilia, etc.), but the available data are often ambiguous and vary depending on the studied population. Thus, the existing contradictions and insufficient consensus of certain biological processes involved in PE development necessitate a further study of this pregnancy complication.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Funding. The study had no external funding.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

All authors made significant contributions to the research and preparation of the article, read and approved the final version before its publication.

×

About the authors

Maria Yu. Abramova

Belgorod National Research University

Author for correspondence.
Email: abramova_myu@bsu.edu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1406-2515
Scopus Author ID: 57212494118

MD

Russian Federation, Belgorod

Mikhail I. Churnosov

Belgorod National Research University

Email: churnosov@bsu.edu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1254-6134
Scopus Author ID: 6601948788

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, Belgorod

References

  1. Reshetnikov EA. rs34845949 polymorphism of the SASH1 gene is associated with the risk of preeclampsia. Research Results in Biomedicine. 2021;7(1):44−55. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18413/2658-6533-2020-7-1-0-4
  2. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. WHO recommendations for prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. World Health Organization; 2011. [cited 23 Aug 2021]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23741776/
  3. Osnovnye pokazateli zdorov’ja materi i rebenka, dejatel’nost’ sluzhby ohrany detstva i rodovspomozhenija v Rossijskoj Federacii. Statisticheskij sbornik 2018. Moscow; 2019. [cited 23.08.2021]. Available from: https://minzdrav.gov.ru/ministry/61/22/stranitsa-979/statisticheskie-i-informatsionnye-materialy/statisticheskiy-sbornik-2018-god. (In Russ.)
  4. Garovic VD, White WM, Vaughan L, et al. Incidence and long-term outcomes of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(18):2323−2334. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.028
  5. Ivanov II., Cheripk MV, Kosolapova NV, et al. Preeklampsiya beremennyh: osobennosti patogeneza, taktiki vedeniya. Tavricheskij mediko-biologicheskij vestnik. 2012;15(2):273−286. (In Russ.)
  6. Golovchenko O, Abramova M, Ponomarenko I, et al. Functionally significant polymorphisms of ESR1and PGR and risk of intrauterine growth restriction in population of central Russia. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2020; 253:52−57. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.07.045
  7. Pankiewicz K, Fijałkowska A, Issat T, et al. Insight into the key points of preeclampsia pathophysiology: Uterine artery remodeling and the role of MicroRNAs. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(6):3132. doi: 10.3390/ijms22063132
  8. Hodzhaeva ZS, Holin AM, Vihljaeva EM. Rannjaja i pozdnjaja prejeklampsija: paradigmy patobiologii i klinicheskaja praktika. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;(10):4−11. (In Russ.)
  9. Ogge G, Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, et al. Placental lesions associated with maternal underperfusion are more frequent in early-onset than in late-onset preeclampsia. J Perinat Med. 2011;39(6):641−652. doi: 10.1515/jpm.2011.098
  10. Ajlamazjan JeK, Stepanova OI, Sel’kov SA, Sokolov DI. Kletki immunnoj sistemy materi i kletki trofoblasta: “Konstruktivnoe sotrudnichestvo” radi dostizhenija sovmestnoj celi. Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii medicinskih nauk. 2013;68(11):12−21. (In Russ.)
  11. Moser G, Windsperger K, Pollheimer J, et al. Human trophoblast invasion: new and unexpected routes and functions. Histochem Cell Biol. 2018;150(4):361−370. doi: 10.1007/s00418-018-1699-0
  12. Highet AR, Khoda SM, Buckberry S, et al. Hypoxia induced HIF-1/HIF-2 activity alters trophoblast transcriptional regulation and promotes invasion. Eur J Cell Biol. 2015;94(12):589−602. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2015.10.004
  13. Prossler J, Chen Q, Chamley L, James JL. The relationship between TGF, low oxygen and the outgrowth of extravillous trophoblasts from anchoring villi during the first trimester of pregnancy. Cytokine. 2014;68(1):9−15. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2014.03.001
  14. Albers RE, Kaufman MR, Natale BV, et al. Trophoblast-specific expression of hif-1 results in preeclampsia-like symptoms and fetal growth restriction. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):2742. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39426-5
  15. Qu H, Yu Q, Jia B, et al. HIF-3 affects preeclampsia development by regulating EVT growth via activation of the Flt-1/JAK/STAT signaling pathway in hypoxia. Mol Med Rep. 2021;23(1):1. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2020.11701
  16. Jena MK, Sharma NR, Petitt M, et al. Pathogenesis of preeclampsia and therapeutic approaches targeting the placenta. Biomolecules. 2020;10(6):953. doi: 10.3390/biom10060953
  17. Yagel S, Cohen SM, Goldman-Wohl D. An integrated model of preeclampsia: a multifaceted syndrome of the maternal cardiovascular-placental-fetal array. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2020;S0002-9378(20)31197−31202. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.023
  18. Vaka VR, McMaster KM, Cunningham MW Jr., et al. Role of mitochondrial dysfunction and reactive oxygen species in mediating hypertension in the reduced uterine perfusion pressure rat model of preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2018;72(3):703−711. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.118.11290
  19. Pogorelova TN, Krukier II, Gunko VO, et al. The imbalance of vasoactive components and arachidonic acid in the placenta and amniotic fluid in preeclampsia. Biomedicinskaja himija. 2019;65(3):245−250. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18097/PBMC20196503245
  20. Taysi S, Tascan AS, Ugur MG, Demir M. Radicals, oxidative/nitrosative stress and preeclampsia. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2019;19(3):178−193. doi: 10.2174/1389557518666181015151350
  21. Tenório MB, Ferreira RC, Moura FA, et al. Cross-talk between oxidative stress and inflammation in preeclampsia. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:8238727. doi: 10.1155/2019/8238727
  22. Tal R, Shaish A, Barshack I, et al. Effects of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha overexpression in pregnant mice: possible implications for preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Pathol. 2010;177:2950–2962. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090800
  23. Wang A, Rana S, Karumanchi SA. Preeclampsia: the role of angiogenic factors in its pathogenesis. Physiology (Bethesda). 2009;24:147−158. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00043.2008
  24. Reshetnikov E, Ponomarenko I, Golovchenko O, et al. The VNTR polymorphism of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene and blood pressure in women at the end of pregnancy. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019;58(3):390−395. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.11.035
  25. Steinberg G, Khankin EV, Karumanchi SA. Angiogenic factors and preeclampsia. Thromb Res. 2009;123(Suppl 2):S93−99. doi: 10.1016/S0049-3848(09)70020-9
  26. Iskakova SS, Zharmahanova GM, Dvoracka M. Harakteristika proangiogennyh faktorov i ih patogeneticheskaja rol’. Nauka i zdravoohranenie. 2013;(6):8−12. (In Russ.)
  27. Strizhakov AN, Timokhina EV, Ibragimova SM, et al. A novel approach to the differential prognosis of early and late preeclampsia. Akusherstvo, ginekologija i reprodukcija. 2018;12(2):55−61. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17749/2313-7347.2018.12.2.055-061
  28. Chen J, Khalil RA. Matrix metalloproteinases in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2017;148:87−165. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.04.001
  29. Reshetnikov EA, Akulova LY, Dobrodomova IS, et al. The insertion-deletion polymorphism of the ACE gene is associated with increased blood pressure in women at the end of pregnancy. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2015;16(3):623−632. doi: 10.1177/1470320313501217
  30. Herse F, LaMarca B. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor autoantibody (AT1-AA)-mediated pregnancy hypertension. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2013;69:413–418. doi: 10.1111/aji.12072
  31. Cunningham MW, Williams JM Jr, Amaral L, et al. Agonistic autoantibodies to the angiotensin II type 1 receptor enhance angiotensin II-induced renal vascular sensitivity and reduce renal function during pregnancy. Hypertension. 2016;68(5):1308–1313. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07971
  32. Aneman I, Pienaar D, Suvakov S, et al. Mechanisms of key innate immune cells in early- and late-onset preeclampsia. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1864. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020. 01864
  33. Yang X, Yang Y, Yuan Y, et al. The roles of uterine natural killer (NK) cells and KIR/HLA-C combination in the development of preeclampsia: A systematic review. BioMed research international. 2020;2020:4808072. doi: 10.1155/2020/4808072
  34. Phipps EA, Thadhani R, Benzing T, et al. Pre-eclampsia: pathogenesis, novel diagnostics and therapies. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019;15:275–289. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0119-6
  35. Kudryavtsev IV, Borisov AG, Vasilyeva EV, et al. Phenotypic characterisation of peripheral blood cytotoxic T lymphocytes: regulatory and effector molecules. Medicinskaja immunologija. 2018;20(2):227−240. (In Russ.). doi: 10.15789/1563-0625-2018-2-227-240
  36. Robertson SA, Care AS, Moldenhauer LM. Regulatory T cells in embryo implantation and the immune response to pregnancy. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(10):4224−4235. doi: 10.1172/JCI122182
  37. Frejdlin IS. Reguljatornye T-kletki: proishozhdenie i funkcii. Medicinskaja immunologija. 2005;7(4):347−354. (In Russ.)
  38. Teirilä L, Heikkinen-Eloranta J, Kotimaa J, et al. Regulation of the complement system and immunological tolerance in pregnancy. Semin immunol. 2019;45:101337. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2019.101337
  39. Ives CW, Sinkey R, Rajapreyar I, et al. Preeclampsia-pathophysiology and clinical presentations: JACC State-of-the-Art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(14):1690−1702. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.014
  40. Verdonk K, Visser W, Van Den Meiracker AH, Danser AH. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in pre-eclampsia: the delicate balance between good and bad. Clin Sci (Lond). 2014;126(8):537−544. doi: 10.1042/CS20130455
  41. LaMarca B, Cornelius DC, Harmon AC, et al. Identifying immune mechanisms mediating the hypertension during preeclampsia. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2016;311(1):R1−9. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00052.2016
  42. Giannakou K, Evangelou E, Papatheodorou SI. Genetic and non-genetic risk factors for pre-eclampsia: umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(6):720−730. doi: 10.1002/uog.18959
  43. Golovchenko OV, Abramova MYu, Ponomarenko IV, Churnosov MI. Polymorphic loci of the ESR1 gene are associated with the risk of developing preeclampsia with fetal growth retardation. Akusherstvo, Ginekologija i Reprodukcija. 2020;14(6):583–591. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2020.187
  44. Rana S, Lemoine E, Granger JP, Karumanchi SA. Preeclampsia: pathophysiology, challenges, and perspectives. Circ Res. 2019;124(7):1094−1112. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313276
  45. Panaitescu AM, Syngelaki A, Prodan N, et al. Chronic hypertension and adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(2):228−235. doi: 10.1002/uog.17493
  46. Nzelu D, Dumitrascu-Biris D, Nicolaides KH, Kametas NA. Chronic hypertension: first-trimester blood pressure control and likelihood of severe hypertension, preeclampsia, and small for gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(3):337.e1−337.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.235
  47. He XJ, Dai RX, Hu CL. Maternal prepregnancy overweight and obesity and the risk of preeclampsia: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2020;14(1):27−33. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2020.01.004
  48. Lewandowska M, Więckowska B, Sajdak S, Lubiński J. Pre-pregnancy obesity vs. other risk factors in probability models of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension. Nutrients. 2020;12(9):2681. doi: 10.3390/nu12092681
  49. Kalinkina OB, Spiridonova NV. Osobennosti techenija gestoza u zhenshhin s izbytochnoj massoj tela i ozhireniem. Fundamental’nye issledovanija. 2012;10(2):247−249. (In Russ.)
  50. Brosens I, Pijnenborg R, Vercruysse L, Romero R. The “Great Obstetrical Syndromes” are associated with disorders of deep placentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(3):193−201. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.009
  51. Mello G, Parretti E, Marozio L, et al. Thrombophilia is significantly associated with severe preeclampsia: results of a large-scale, case-controlled study. Hypertension. 2005;46(6):1270−1274. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000188979.74172.4d
  52. Belinina AA, Mozgovaya EV, Remneva OV. Spectrum of genetic thrombophilia in pregnant women with varying severity of preeclampsia. Bjulleten’ medicinskoj nauki. 2020;1(17):29−33. (In Russ.)
  53. Mitriuc D, Popuşoi O, Catrinici R, Friptu V. The obstetric complications in women with hereditary thrombophilia. Med Pharm Rep. 2019;92(2):106−110. doi: 10.15386/cjmed-1097
  54. Kapustin RV, Tsybuk EM. Predictors for preeclampsia in pregnant women with diabetes mellitus. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020;(12):54−61. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18565/aig.2020.12.54-61
  55. Lisonkova S, Joseph KS. Incidence of preeclampsia: risk factors and outcomes associated with early- versus late-onset disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(6):544.e1−544.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.019
  56. Bramham K. Diabetic nephropathy and pregnancy. Semin Nephrol. 2017;37(4):362−369. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2017.05.008
  57. Hauth JC, Clifton RG, Roberts JM, et al. Maternal insulin resistance and preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(4):327.e1−6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.02.024
  58. Boyd HA, Tahir H, Wohlfahrt J, Melbye M. Associations of personal and family preeclampsia history with the risk of early-, intermediate- and late-onset preeclampsia. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(11):1611−1619. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt189
  59. Caughey AB, Stotland NE, Washington AE, Escobar GJ. Maternal ethnicity, paternal ethnicity, and parental ethnic discordance: predictors of preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(1):156−161. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000164478.91731.06
  60. Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Pandita A, Miller EC, et al. Preeclampsia outcomes at delivery and race. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(21):3619−3626. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1581522
  61. Zhang N, TanJ, Yang H, Khalil RA. Comparative risks and predictors of preeclamptic pregnancy in the Eastern, Western and developing world. Biochem Pharmacol. 2020;182:114247. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114247
  62. Yong HEJ, Murthi P, Brennecke SP, Moses EK. Genetic approaches in preeclampsia. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1710:53−72. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7498-6_5
  63. Serrano NC, Quintero-Lesmes DC, Dudbridge F, et al. Family history of pre-eclampsia and cardiovascular disease as risk factors for pre-eclampsia: the GenPE case-control study. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2020;39(1):56−63. doi: 10.1080/10641955.2019.1704003
  64. Bezerra PC, Leão MD, Queiroz JW, et al. Family history of hypertension as an important risk factor for the development of severe preeclampsia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(5):612−617. doi: 10.3109/00016341003623720
  65. Ness RB, Markovic N, Bass D, et al. Family history of hypertension, heart disease, and stroke among women who develop hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(6):1366−1371. doi: 10.1016/j.obstetgynecol.2003.08.011

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2021 Eсо-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 66759 от 08.08.2016 г. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия Эл № 77 - 6389
от 15.07.2002 г.



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies