Email this article Comprehensive method of ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis
- Authors: Nagorneva S.V.1, Shalina M.A.1, Yarmolinskaya M.I.1,2, Netreba E.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
- North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
- Issue: Vol 70, No 6 (2021)
- Pages: 73-82
- Section: Original Research
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/jowd/article/view/83066
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD83066
- ID: 83066
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are currently no uniform standards for adenomyosis diagnosis, so the search for the most informative methods is an urgent task. This article presents modern views on the diagnosis of adenomyosis and the role of ultrasound in its diagnostics.
AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic capabilities of ultrasound in the diffuse form of adenomyosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 164 patients aged 22 to 43 years old, who had a comprehensive ultrasound examination done. The points were calculated and the presence or absence of adenomyosis, as well as its severity, were determined using the developed scale. The sequential implementation of six ultrasound techniques were used for a comprehensive ultrasound assessment of adenomyosis: assessment of the myometrium echostructure homogeneity; assessment of the ratio of the anterior and posterior uterine wall thicknesses; compression elastography; assessment of the junctional zone in the 3D mode; assessment of the uniformity of the junctional zone thickness along uterine walls; vascularization of the myometrium in the Power Doppler 3D Glass Body mode.
RESULTS: We have developed the comprehensive ultrasound method of adenomyosis diagnostics. The sensitivity of the method was 95%, and the specificity was 100%. The positive predictive value was 100%, and the negative predictive value was 90%. The accuracy of the method was 97%.
CONCLUSIONS: The developed scoring system for the comprehensive assessment of adenomyosis allows for an independent assessment of the myometrium for each criterion, summarizing the scores and, therefore, assessing the presence and severity of adenomyosis more objectively and reliably. The high sensitivity and specificity of this technique allows recommending it for use by ultrasound specialists.
Full Text
About the authors
Stanislava V. Nagorneva
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: stanislava_n@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0402-5304
SPIN-code: 5109-7613
ResearcherId: К-3723-2018
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgMaria A. Shalina
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Email: amarus@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5921-3217
SPIN-code: 6673-2660
Scopus Author ID: 57200072308
ResearcherId: A-7180-2019
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgMaria I. Yarmolinskaya
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott; North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Email: m.yarmolinskaya@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6551-4147
SPIN-code: 3686-3605
Scopus Author ID: 7801562649
ResearcherId: P-2183-2014
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgElena A. Netreba
The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott
Author for correspondence.
Email: dr.netlenka@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0485-3612
SPIN-code: 9193-3154
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
References
- Diseases of the abdomen and pelvis 2018-2021: Diagnostic imaging. Ed. by J. Hodler, R.A. Kubik-Huch, G.K. von Schulthess. Cham: Springer; 2018 [cited 23 Sept 2021]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK543808/. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-75019-4
- van den Bosch T, van Schoubroeck D. Ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis and adenomyosis: state of the art. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;51:16−24. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.01.013
- Exacoustos C, Zupi E. A new era in diagnosing adenomyosis is coming. Fertil Steril. 2018;110:858−862. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.07.005
- Abbott JA. Adenomyosis and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB-A) – Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;40:68−81. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.09.006
- Pinzauti S, Lazzeri L, Tosti C, et al. Transvaginal sonographic features of diffuse adenomyosis in 18-30-year-old nulligravid women without endometriosis: association with symptoms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:730–736. doi: 10.1002/uog.14834
- Yu O, Schulze-Rath R, Grafton J, et al. Adenomyosis incidence, prevalence and treatment: United States population-based study 2006–2015. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(1):94−104. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.016
- Taran FA, Wallwiener M, Kabashi D, et al. Clinical characteristics indicating adenomyosis at the time of hysterectomy: a retrospective study in 291 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285:1571–1576. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-2180-7
- Li X, Liu X, Guo SW. Clinical profiles of 710 premenopausal women with adenomyosis who underwent hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40:485–494. doi: 10.1111/jog.12211
- Li JJ, Chung JPW, Wang S, Li TC, Duan H. The investigation and management of Adenomyosis in women who wish to improve or preserve fertility. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:6832685. doi: 10.1155/2018/6832685
- Tan J, Yong P, Bedaiwy MA. A critical review of recent advances in the diagnosis, classification, and management of uterine adenomyosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019;31(4):212−221. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000555
- Chapron C, Vannuccini S, Santulli P, et al. Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(3):392−411. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz049
- van den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone FP, et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:284–298. doi: 10.1002/uog.7487
- van den Bosch T, De Bruijin AM, De Leeuw RA, et al. Sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53:576–582. doi: 10.1002/uog.19096
- Cunningham RK, Horrow MM, Smith RJ, et al. Adenomyosis: a sonographic diagnosis. RadioGraphics. 2018;38(5):1576–1589. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018180080
- Balasubramanya R, Valle C. Uterine imaging. StatPearls Publishing [Internet]; 2019 [cited 23 Sept 2021]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551551/
- Maheshwari A, Gurunath S, Fatima F, et al. Adenomyosis and subfertility: a systematic review of prevalence, diagnosis, treatment and fertility outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(4):374−392. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms006
- Exacoustos C, Brienza L, Di Giovanni A, et al. Adenomyosis: three dimensional sonographic findings of the junctional zone and correlation with histology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;37(4):471−479. doi: 10.1002/uog.8900
- Rasmussen CK, Hansen ES, Ernst E, et al. Two-and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography for diagnosis of adenomyosis of the inner myometrium. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38(5):750−760. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.033
Supplementary files
