Psychological analysis of women’s experiencing of late pregnancy termination for fetal anomaly



Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Goals. Psychological analysis and summarizing of information of women’s experiencing of late pregnancy termination for fetal anomaly.

Participants and methods. 105 participants from 19 to 43 years old, experienced late pregnancy termination for fetal anomaly after 22 gestation weeks, which needed the psychological support during being in maternal hospital. Method of data collection is structured clinical interview with following analysis and summarizing information that had been received. It was also performed many other authors’ data analysis. This led us for the conclusion about psychological prophylactics long-term consequences after late pregnancy termination.

Results. It was revealed general psychological mechanisms of women’s’ experiencing of several consequential steps of process of pregnancy termination: primary diagnosis, process of decision- making, during the feticide procedure, delivery and postpartum period. Tasks of psychological support formulated; types of reasons for termination decision were described, influence of «psychological status» of fetus for character of experience. The analysis of foreign issues was made and the result was description of faraway traumatic consequences of late pregnancy termination for woman and her family.

Conclusions. Late pregnancy termination is traumatic choice for woman and her family and it has medical, psychological, ethical and legal context. Psychological maintenance can optimize patients’ contact with medical stuff in period she stays in maternity hospital. Psychologically conceived experience ensure constructive attitude to the future pregnancy and its’ positive conditions.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Anton V. Mikhailov

Maternity Clinic N17 St.Petersburg

Author for correspondence.
Email: mav080960@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0343-8820
SPIN-code: 7967-4999
Russian Federation, Lesnozavodskaya 4 street, 192174, St.Petersburg, Russia

Iulia Zamanaeva

СПбГБУЗ Родильный дом №17

Email: jzamanaeva@mail.ru

психолог, кандидат психологических наук

Russian Federation, Lesnozavodskaya 4 street, 192174, St.Petersburg, Russia

References

  1. Robinson M., Baker L., Hill J. The relationship of attachment theory and prenatal loss. Death Stud. 1999;23:257-270 https://doi.org/10.1080/074811899201073
  2. White-van Mourik M.C.A., Connor J.M., Ferguson-Smith M.A. The psychological sequelae of a second-trimester termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality. Prenatal Diagnosis.1992; 12: 189- 204 https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.1970120308
  3. Davies V., Gledhill J., McFadyen A., Whitlow B., Economides D. Psychological outcome in women undergoing termination of pregnancy for ultrasound-detected fetal anomaly in the first and second trimesters: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:389-392 http://doi.org/10.1002/uog.1854
  4. Ракитина Е. Исследование психологического статуса женщин, перенесших медицинский аборт на различных сроках беременности по разным показаниям // Перинатальная психология и психология родительства. – 2012. – № 3. – С.24–34. [Rakitina E. Issledovanie psikhologicheskogo statusa zhenshchin, perenesshikh meditsinskiy abort na razlichnykh srokakh beremennosti po raznym pokazaniyam. Perinatal'naya psikhologiya i psikhologiya roditel'stva. 2012; 3:24–34. (In Russ)]
  5. Брутман В.И., Радионова М.С. Формирование привязанности матери к ребенку в период беременности // Вопросы психологии. – 1997. – №7. – C. 38-47. [Brutman V.I., Radionova M.S. Formirovanie privyazannosti materi k rebenku v period beremennosti. Voprosy psikhologii. 1997; 7:38-47. (In Russ)]
  6. Копыл О.А., Баженова О.В., Баз Л.Л. Выделение факторов и условий психологического риска для будущего развития ребенка // Синапс. – 1994. – №5. – С. 15-28. [Kopyl O.A., Bazhenova O.V., Baz L.L. Vydelenie faktorov i usloviy psikhologicheskogo riska dlya budushchego razvitiya rebenka. Sinaps.1994;5:15-28. (In Russ)]
  7. Stern D.N., Bruschweiler-Stern N. The birth of a mother. N.Y.: Basic Books; 1998.
  8. Блох М.Е. Переживание утраты образа ребенка в ситуации выявления пороков развития плода // Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. – 2015. – том LXIV(вып.5). – С.17-18.[ Blokh M.E. Perezhivanie utraty obraza rebenka v situatsii vyyavleniya porokov razvitiya ploda. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh bolezney. 2015;LXIV(5):17-18. (In Russ)]
  9. Cote-Arsenault D., Denney-Koelsch E. «Have no regrets»: Parents’ experiences and developmental tasks in pregnancy with a fetal diagnosis. Social Science and Medicine. 2016;154:100-109
  10. Lalor J., Galavan E. Recasting hope: A process of adaptation following fetal anomaly diagnosis. Social Science and Medicine. 2009;68 (3):462-472
  11. DiMiceli-Zsigmond M., Williams A., Richrdson M. Expecting the Unexpected: perspectives on stillbirth and late termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2015;121 (2):457-464 http://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000785
  12. Benute R.G.G., Zugaib M. Feeling of women regarding end-of-life decision making after ultrasound diagnosis of a lethal fetal malformation. Midwifery.2012;28 (4):472-475 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2011.06.011
  13. Govender L., Ndjapa-Ndamkou C., Aldous C., Moodley J. A pilot study of women’s experiences after being offered late termination of pregnancy for severe fetal anomaly. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2015;18 (7):71-76 http://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.170825
  14. Korenromp M.J., Page-Christiaens G.C.M.L., J.van den Bout, Mulder E.J.H., Visser G.H.A. The decision process in case of Down syndrome. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2007;Feb;196(2):149-156 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.09.013
  15. Селигман М., Дарлинг Р.Б. Обычные семьи, особые дети. М.: Теревинф; 2013 [Seligman M., Darling R.B. Ordinary families, special children. Moscow: Terevinf; 2013 (In Russ)]
  16. Fay V., Thomas S., Slade P. Maternal-fetal medicine specialists’ experiences of conducting feticide as part of termination of pregnancy: a qualitative study. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2016;36,92-99 http://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4720
  17. Михайлов А.В. Заманаева Ю.В. Психология переживания антенатальных потерь // Плод и новорожденный как пациенты. – СПб.: ИД «Петрополис». – 2015. – C.696-703. [Mikhaylov A.V. Zamanaeva Yu.V. Psikhologiya perezhivaniya antenatal'nykh poter'. Plod i novorozhdennyy kak patsienty. 2015:696-703. (In Russ)]
  18. Korenromp M.J., Visser G.H.A. Adjustment to termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: a longitudinal study in women at 4, 8 and 16 month. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2009;201(2):160-167 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.007
  19. Elder S. H., Laurence K.M. The impact of supportive intervention after second trimester TOPFA. Prenatal Diagnosis. 1991;11(1):47-54 https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.1970110109
  20. Nazare B., Fonseca A., Canavarro M.C. Trauma following termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality: is this the path from guilt to grief? Journal of loss and trauma: international perspectives on stress and coping. 2014;19(3):244-261 https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2012.743335
  21. Добряков И.В., Блох М.Е., Фаерберг Л.М. Перинатальные утраты: психологические аспекты, специфика горевания, формы психологической помощи. – Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. – 2015. – том LXIV(вып.5). – С. 4-10. [Dobryakov I.V., Blokh M.E., Faerberg L.M. Perinatal'nye utraty: psikhologicheskie aspekty, spetsifika gorevaniya, formy psikhologicheskoy pomoshchi. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh bolezney. 2015; LXIV(5): 4-10 (In Russ) ]
  22. Костерина Е.М. Психологическое сопровождение перинатальных потерь // Перинатальная психология и психология родительства. – 2004. – №2. – С. 94-107. [Kosterina E.M. Psikhologicheskoe soprovozhdenie perinatal'nykh poter' // Perinatal'naya psikhologiya i psikhologiya roditel'stva. 2004; 2: 94-107 (In Russ)]

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) Eсо-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 66759 от 08.08.2016 г. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия Эл № 77 - 6389
от 15.07.2002 г.