Assessment of the degree of inflammatory reaction in uveitis: diagnostic capabilities of clinical methods

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Inflammatory diseases of the uvea demonstrate a high incidence and a significant prevalence among people of working age. Uveitis complications often lead to blindness and low vision in patients of various age groups. Diagnostics and monitoring the efficacy of uveitis therapy requires the use of quantitative criteria to assess the degree of inflammatory reaction. The aim of this review is to analyze the informative value and accuracy of various clinical methods for subjective and objective assessment of the inflammatory reaction in the anterior and posterior segments of the eye in uveitis. To assess the inflammatory reaction in uveitis in everyday clinical practice, biomicroscopy is most often used, which is characterized by subjectivity associated with the level of qualification of the ophthalmologist. Other clinical methods, such as fluorescein angiography, optical coherence tomography-angiography, have high sensitivity and informative value along with independence from the subjective impression of the examiner. However, the first of them is invasive, and the second is still not available to a wide range of practicing ophthalmologists today, especially in the “angio” mode. Laser flare photometry is of special importance in the diagnosis of uveitis. It is both a non-invasive and sensitive method that makes it possible to obtain quantitative indicators characterizing the activity of uveal inflammation. The prospects for the application and development of this method are important both for clinical practice and for research purposes.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Irina A. Gndoyan

Volgograd State Medical University

Email: irina.gndoyan@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7581-9473
SPIN-code: 7660-1156

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor

Russian Federation, Volgograd

Aleksei V. Petraevsky

Volgograd State Medical University

Email: volgophthalm@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2924-8344
SPIN-code: 3070-4786

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Volgograd

Viktoriya V. Chubarikova

Volgograd State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: viktoriarahmaeva@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-7947-6379
SPIN-code: 2438-6665
Russian Federation, Volgograd

References

  1. Drozdova EA. The classification and epidemiology of uveitis. RMJ. Clinical ophthalmology. 2016;(3):155–159. (In Russ.) EDN: ZNOGAL
  2. Tsirouki T, Dastiridou A, Symeonidis C, et al. A focus on the epidemiology of uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2018;26(1):2–16. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2016.1196713
  3. Wang L, Guo Z, Zheng Y, Li Q, et al. Analysis of the clinical diagnosis and treatment of uveitis. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10(12): 12782–12788. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-3549
  4. Joltikov KA, Lobo-Chan AM. Epidemiology and risk factors in non-infectious uveitis: a systematic review. Frontiers in Medicine (Lausanne). 2021;8:695904. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.695904
  5. Chang MH, Shantha JG, Fondriest JJ, et al. Uveitis in children and adolescents. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2021;47(4):619–641. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2021.07.005
  6. Rathinam SR, Babu M. Algorithmic approach in the diagnosis of uveitis. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2013;61(6):255–262. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.
  7. Papaliodis GN. Uveitis: a practical guide to the diagnosis and treatment of intraocular inflammation. Springer International Publishing AG. 2017. 35 p. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-09126-6
  8. Foster CS, Vitale AT. Diagnosis and treatment of uveitis. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 2002. P. 21–91. doi: 10.5005/jp/books/11822_8
  9. Moshirfar M, Villarreal A, Ronquillo Y. Fuchs uveitis syndrome. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2022.
  10. Marchenko A. Features of the course, diagnosis and treatment of anterior cytomegalovirus uveitis. Ophthalmology Eastern Europe. 2023;13(1):54–63. EDN: OTOCIS doi: 10.34883/PI.2023.13.1.017
  11. Agrawal RV, Murthy S, Sangwan V, Biswas J. Current approach in diagnosis and management of anterior uveitis. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2010;58(1):11–19. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.58468
  12. Astakhov YS, Kuznetcova TI. Laser flare photometry in clinical practice. Ophthalmology Journal. 2016;9(2):36–44. EDN: WBZWTP doi: 10.17816/OV9236-44
  13. Malyugin B, Pashtaev N, Pozdeeva N, Fadeeva T. Evaluation of the effectiveness of anti-inflammatory therapy after phacoemulsification in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmosurgery. 2010;(1):39–44. (In Russ.) EDN: PXQZQJ
  14. Musin UK, Solovyeva EP, Muslimov SA. Condition of connective-tissue structure of the hematoophthalmic barrier in case of uveitis. Practical Medicine. 2019;17(1):45–48. EDN: SBMXKO doi: 10.32000/2072-1757-2019-1-45-48
  15. McNally TW, Liu X, et al. Instrument-based tests for quantifying aqueous humour protein levels in uveitis: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1206-2
  16. Jabs DA, Nussenblatt RB, Rosenbaum JT. Standardization of uveitis nomenclature (SUN) working group. Standardization of uveitis nomenclature for reporting clinical data. Results of the first international workshop. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140(3):509–516. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.057
  17. Egorov EA, Avetisov SE, Aklayeva NA. Ophthalmology: national guide. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2022. 904 p. (In Russ.)
  18. Neroev VV, Katargina LA, Denisova EV, Meshkova GI. Indications and effectiveness of retinal laser coagulation in peripheral uveitis in children and adolescents. Bulletin OGU. 2008;(12):106–108. (In Russ.) EDN: VZPUHB
  19. Kempen JH, Ganesh SK, Sangwan VS, Rathinam SR. Interobserver agreement in grading activity and site of inflammation in eyes of patients with uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(6):813–818.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.06.004
  20. Author’s Certificate USSR No. 1759418/ 07.09.92. Byul. No. 33. Petrayevskij AV, Rybnikov АА. Method for diagnosing peripheral uveites. (In Russ.) Available from: https://yandex.ru/patents/doc/SU1759418A1_19920907
  21. Patent RU No. 2145184/ 10.02.2000. Petraevsky AV, Gndoyan IA. Method for diagnosing peripheral uveitis. Available from: http://allpatents.ru/patent/2145184.html
  22. Akhmedov AA, Podgornaia NN. Iridoangiography using indocyanine green in severely pigmented iris in clinical conditions. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 1991;107(5):36–40.
  23. Petrayevskij AV, Gndoyan IA. Application fluorescein angiography for assessment of anterior eye segment hemomicrocirculation in patients with cataract and pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2014;130(2):36–41. (In Russ.)
  24. Patent RU No. 2122340/ 27.11.1998. Sidorenko EI, Pavlova TV, Bliznjukova AS. Method of introducing contrast substance when carrying out fluorescent vasography of the eye. (In Russ.) Available from: https://yandex.ru/patents/doc/RU2122340C1_19981127
  25. Kishkina VYa. Fluorescence angiography of the eye and its role in ophthalmosurgery [dissertation abstract]. Moscow; 1989. 44 p. (In Russ.)
  26. Agrawal RV, Biswas J, Gunasekaran D. Indocyanine green angiography in posterior uveitis. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013;61(4): 148–159. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.112159
  27. Takhchidi HP, Kishkina VYa, Semyonov AD, Kishkin YuI. Fluorescence angiography in ophthalmology. Moscow: Medicine; 2007. 312 p. (In Russ.)
  28. Panova IE, Samkovich EV, Melikhova MV, Grigoryeva NN. Indocyanine green angiography in the diagnostics of choroidal tumors. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2020;136(5):5–13. (In Russ.) EDN: LJFDTD doi: 10.17116/oftalma20201360515
  29. Herbort CP, Auer C, Wolfensberger TJ, et al. Contribution of indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) to the appraisal of choroidal involvement in posterior uveitis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 1999;40:383.
  30. Drozdova EA. Diagnostic possibilities of eye-ball shells examination against uveitis. Bashkortostan Medical Journal. 2018;73(1): 51–54. EDN: YVJUCL
  31. Katargina LA. The State of the choroid in children with anterior uveitis assessed by optical coherence tomography. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2020;13(1):29–34. EDN: WPJOHH doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2020-13-1-29-34
  32. Ozdal PC, Berker N, Tugal-Tutkun I. Pars planitis: epidemiology, clinical characteristics, management and visual prognosis. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2015;10(4):469–480. doi: 10.4103/2008-322X.176897
  33. Fingler J, Schwartz D, Yang C, Fraser SE. Mobility and transverse flow visualization using phase variance contrast with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Express. 2007;15(20): 12636–12653. doi: 10.1364/oe.15.012636
  34. Fingler J, Readhead C, Schwartz DM, Fraser SE. Phase-contrast OCT imaging of transverse flows in the mouse retina and choroid. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(11):5055–5059. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1627
  35. Pichi F, Sarraf D, Arepalli S, et al. The application of optical coherence tomography angiography in uveitis and inflammatory eye diseases. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2017;59:178–201. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.04.005
  36. Dingerkus VLS, Munk MR, Brinkmann MP, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) as a new diagnostic tool in uveitis. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2019;9(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12348-019-0176-9
  37. Tranos P, Karasavvidou EM, Gkorou O, Pavesio C. Optical coherence tomography angiography in uveitis. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2019;9(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12348-019-0190-y
  38. Agarwal A, Pichi F, Invernizzi A, et al. Stepwise approach for fundus imaging in the diagnosis and management of posterior uveitis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2023;68(3):446–480. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.01.006
  39. Küchle M. Laser tyndallometry in anterior segment diseases. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1994;5(4):110–116.
  40. Sawa M, Tsurimaki Y, Tsuru T, Shimizu H. New quantitative method to determine protein concentration and cell number in aqueous in vivo. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1988;32(2):132–142.
  41. Guex-Crosier Y, Pittet N, Herbort CP. Evaluation of laser flare-cell photometry in the appraisal and management of intraocular inflammation in uveitis. Ophthalmology. 1994;101(4):728–735. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(13)31050-1
  42. Biziorek B, Zarnowski T, Zagórski Z. Evaluation and monitoring of selected inflammation patterns in uveitis using laser tyndallometry. Klin Oczna. 2000;102(3):169–172.
  43. Tugal-Tutkun I, Herbort CP. Laser flare photometry: a noninvasive, objective, and quantitative method to measure intraocular inflammation. Int Ophthalmol. 2010;30(5):453–464. doi: 10.1007/s10792-009-9310-2
  44. Hedayatfar A, Hashemi H, Asghari S, et al. Chronic subclinical inflammation after phakic intraocular lenses implantation: Comparison between Artisan and Artiflex models. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2017;29(4):300–304. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2017.06.003
  45. Choe S, Heo JW, Oh BL. Quiescence and subsequent anterior chamber inflammation in adalimumab-treated pediatric noninfectious uveitis. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2020;34(4):274–280. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2020.0005
  46. Papasavvas I, Herbort CP Jr. Granulomatous features in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis is not a rare occurrence. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:1055–1059. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S299436
  47. Shah SM, Spalton DJ, Taylor JC. Correlations between laser flare measurements and anterior chamber protein concentrations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33(10):2878–2884.
  48. Kesim C, Chehab Z, Hasanreisoglu M. Laser flare photometry in uveitis. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2022;36(4):337–343. doi: 10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_119_22
  49. Wakefield D, Herbort CP, Tugal-Tutkun I, Zierhut M. Controversies in ocular inflammation and immunology laser flare photometry. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2010;18(5):334–340. doi: 10.3109/09273948.2010.512994
  50. Liu X, Solebo AL, Faes L, et al. Instrument-based tests for measuring anterior chamber cells in uveitis: a systematic review. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2020;28(6):898–907. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2019.1640883
  51. Agrawal R, Keane PA, Singh J, et al. Classification of semi-automated flare readings using the Kowa FM 700 laser cell flare meter in patients with uveitis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94(2):e135–e141. doi: 10.1111/aos.12833
  52. Bernasconi O, Papadia M, Herbort CP. Sensitivity of laser flare photometry compared to slit-lamp cell evaluation in monitoring anterior chamber inflammation in uveitis. Int Ophthalmol. 2010;30(5): 495–500. doi: 10.1007/s10792-010-9386-8
  53. Guex-Crosier Y, Pittet N, Herbort CP. Sensitivity of laser flare photometry to monitor inflammation in uveitis of the posterior segment. Ophthalmology. 1995;102(4):613–621. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30976-1
  54. Gonzales CA, Ladas JG, Davis JL, et al. Relationships between laser flare photometry values and complications of uveitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(12):1763–1769. doi: 10.1001/archopht.119.12.1763
  55. Tugal-Tutkun I, Cingü K, Kir N, et al. Use of laser flare-cell photometry to quantify intraocular inflammation in patients with Behçet uveitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246(8): 1169–1177. doi: 10.1007/s00417-008-0823-6
  56. Kabaalioglu Guner M, Guner ME, Oray M, Tugal-Tutkun I. Correlation between widefield fundus fluorescein angiography leakage score and anterior chamber flare in Behçet uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2022;32(1):54–61. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2022.2152700
  57. Yalcindag FN, Bingol Kiziltunc P, Savku E. Evaluation of intraocular inflammation with laser flare photometry in Behçet uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2017;25(1):41–45. doi: 10.3109/09273948.2015.1108444
  58. Holland GN. A reconsideration of anterior chamber flare and its clinical relevance for children with chronic anterior uveitis (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2007;105:344–364.
  59. Kuznetsova TI. Peculiarities of tactics of management of patients with uveitis in systemic diseases [dissertation abstract]. Saint Petersburg; 2020. 22 p. (In Russ.)
  60. Lam DL, Axtelle J, Rath S, et al. A Rayleigh scatter-based ocular flare analysis meter for flare photometry of the anterior chamber. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2015;4(6):7. doi: 10.1167/tvst.4.6.7
  61. Liu X, McNally TW, Beese S, et al. Non-invasive instrument-based tests for quantifying anterior chamber flare in uveitis: a systematic review. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2021;29(5):982–990. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2019.1709650

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-65574 от 04 мая 2016 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies