Stimulation of future thinking in stimulant–depending patients using questionnaire–based structured interview

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Impaired future thinking (FT) a human ability to imagine and comprehend images and scenarios of the personal future may contribute to the severity of psychoactive substance dependence. Spontaneous mental images of the impacts of using psychoactive substances and/or of one’s own death (‘flash-forwards’), as well as impaired arbitrary modeling of future images (for example, overgeneralization and lack of reflection) interfere with adherence to treatment and stability of remission in addictions.

AIM: To evaluate the influence of FT-activating intervention on treatment outcomes in patients with narcotic psychostimulant dependence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized prospective controlled clinical trial conducted in 2021–2023 involved 112 inpatients with stimulant dependence (F15.2). Of them, the main group consisted of 56 patients (age 24.0 [21.0; 27.0] years; 30.4% of men), who underwent FT stimulation in the form of semi-structured interview based on the Russian pilot version of the Impact of Future Events Scale (IFES). The control group consisted of 56 patients (age 23.5 [22.0; 26.0] years; 39.3% of men) who received a standard drug addiction conversation of equal duration. The treatment result parameters included the score on the Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES); duration of remission, participation in long-term therapy, in outpatient rehabilitation, inpatient rehabilitation, confirmation of the fact of prescheduled discharge, infringement of regime, incarcerations. The test was conducted upon admission and after discharge. Hospitals stay period — 21 days, follow-up period — 6 months.

RESULTS: At the hospitalization stage, the groups did not differ in socio-demographic and main clinical parameters (p > 0.05). SOCRATES scores were higher in the control group 49.0 [47.0; 49.0] versus 48.0 [47.0; 49.0] (p = 0.040). At the stage of re-test before discharge, the main group showed an improvement in motivation according to SOCRATES and significantly outperformed the control group: 67.0 [65.3; 68.0] versus 50.0 [48.0; 53.8] points (p < 0.001). The main group had a longer duration of remission — 3.3 [0.5; 5.4] months versus 0.5 [0.4; 1.0] months (p = 0.001); fewer prescheduled discharges — 12.5% versus 50.0% (p = 0.001); more frequent visits to long-term therapy — 30.4% versus 8.9% (p = 0.01) and outpatient rehabilitation — 21.4% versus 1.8% (p = 0.001) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: FT-activating intervention directed to stimulating reflection of anxious and positive aspects of the personal future, contributes to increase in duration of remission in the catamnesis, increases motivation and adherence to treatment in patients with addiction to narcotic psychostimulants.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Egor V. Leonov

RSMURyazan State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: leonov.psychiatry@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4624-5815
SPIN-code: 8297-1263
Russian Federation, Ryazan

Ol'ga D. Tuchina

Moscow Research and Practical Center of Narcology

Email: shtuchina@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0683-9080
SPIN-code: 8420-3548

Cand. Sci. (Psych.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Il’ya A. Fedotov

Ryazan State Medical University

Email: ilyafdtv@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2791-7180
SPIN-code: 4004-4132

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor

Russian Federation, Ryazan

Tat’yana V. Agibalova

Moscow Research and Practical Center of Narcology

Email: agibalovatv@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1903-5265
SPIN-code: 2859-1293
ResearcherId: Q-3325-2016

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Dmitriy I. Shustov

Ryazan State Medical University

Email: dmitri_shustov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7803-3388
SPIN-code: 3887-5475

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, Ryazan

References

  1. Schacter DL, Benoit RG, Szpunar KK. Episodic future thinking: mechanisms and functions. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2017;17:41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.06.002
  2. Nandrino J–L, El Haj M. The grey future: Overgenerality of emotional future thinking in alcohol-use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019; 205:107659. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107659
  3. Agibalova TV, Nobatova VN, Tuchina OD, et al. Review of Factors Affecting Remission in Narcological Patients. I. P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald. 2023;31(1):155–63. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/PAVLOVJ105809
  4. Bickel WK, Athamneh LN, Snider SE, et al. Reinforcer Pathology: Implications for Substance Abuse Intervention. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2020;47:139–62. doi: 10.1007/7854_2020_145
  5. Morris AN, El Haj M, Moustafa AA. Episodic Future thinking in drug addiction. In: Moustafa AA, editor. Cognitive, Clinical, and Neural Aspects of Drug Addiction. Academic Press; 2020. P. 187–204. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-816979-7.00008-X
  6. Snider SE, LaConte SM, Bickel WK. Episodic Future Thinking: Expansion of the Temporal Window in Individuals with Alcohol Dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016;40(7):1558–66. doi: 10.1111/acer.13112
  7. García–Pérez Á, Aonso–Diego G, Weidberg S, et al. Effects of episodic future thinking on reinforcement pathology during smoking cessation treatment among individuals with substance use disorders. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022;239(2):631–42. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-06057-6
  8. Forster SE, Steinhauer SR, Ortiz A, et al. Evaluating effects of episodic future thinking on valuation of delayed reward in cocaine use disorder: a pilot study. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2021;47(2):199–208. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2020.1865997
  9. Mellis AM, Snider SE, Deshpande HU, et al. Practicing prospection promotes patience: Repeated episodic future thinking cumulatively reduces delay discounting. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019; 204:107507. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.06.010
  10. Patel H, Amlung M. Acute and extended exposure to episodic future thinking in a treatment seeking addiction sample: A pilot study. J Subs Abuse Treat. 2020;116:108046. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108046
  11. Rafei P, Rezapour T, Bickel WK, et al. Imagining the Future to Reshape the Past: A Path to Combine Cue Extinction and Memory Reconsolidation With Episodic Foresight for Addiction Treatment. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:692645. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.692645
  12. Chang Y–C, Ladd BO. Effects of content and valence of episodic future thinking on delay discounting and alcohol demand. Psychol Addict Behav. 2023;37(1):177–89. doi: 10.1037/adb0000862
  13. Collado A, Stokes A. Imagining the future can shape the present: A systematic review of the impact of episodic future thinking on substance use outcomes. Psychol Addict Behav. 2024;38(1):134–52. doi: 10.1037/adb0000933
  14. Klimanova SG, Trusova AV, Kiselev AS, et al. Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the Russian Version of the Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES). Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2018;26(3):80–104. (In Russ). doi: 10.17759/cpp.2018260305
  15. Deeprose C, Holmes EA. An Exploration of prospective imagery: The Impact of Future Events Scale. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2010;38(2):201–9. doi: 10.1017/s1352465809990671
  16. Tuchina OD, Agibalova TV, Kiatrova LR, et al. Testing Future Thinking Task in Russian–Speaking Sample. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2022;30(3):172–93. (In Russ). doi: 10.17759/cpp.2022300310
  17. Poplevchenkov KN, Agibalova TV, Buzik OZ, et al. Peculiarities of Temperament and Character of Patients with Comorbid Psychiatric Pathology and Combined Dependence on Psychostimulants and Other Psychoactive Substances. I. P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald. 2022;30(4):507–18. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/PAVLOVJ105870
  18. Utkin SI, Buzik OZ. Hemodynamic Disorders in Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome. I. P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald. 2024;32(3):401–12. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/PAVLOVJ623055
  19. Bickel WK, Freitas–Lemos R, Myslowski J, et al. Episodic future thinking as a promising Intervention for substance use disorders: a reinforcer pathology perspective. Curr Addict Rep. 2023;10:494–507. doi: 10.1007/s40429-023-00498-z
  20. Athamneh LN, Brown J, Stein JS, et al. Future thinking to decrease real-world drinking in alcohol use disorder: Repairing reinforcer pathology in a randomized proof-of-concept trial. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2022;30(3):326–37. doi: 10.1037/pha0000460
  21. Ng RMK, Di Simplicio M, McManus F, et al. ‘Flash-forwards’ and suicidal ideation: A prospective investigation of mental imagery, entrapment and defeat in a cohort from the Hong Kong Mental Morbidity Survey. Psychiatry Res. 2016;246:453–60. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.10.018

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. Total scores on the SOCRATES scale in the study groups during therapy.

Download (32KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2. Values of motivation components in study groups.

Download (44KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector


Media Registry Entry of the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Communications (Roskomnadzor) PI No. FS77-76803 dated September 24, 2019.