Ultrasonic criteria of reparative osteogenesis of distraction regeneration of the femur in achondropalzia patients aged 9-12 years with cross-lengthening of the femur and contralateral tibia



如何引用文章

全文:

详细

 

 

Aim: to identify ultrasound criteria for reparative osteogenesis of the distraction regenerate of the femur in patients with achondroplasia, allowing to begin surgical treatment of the contralateral tibia. Materials and methods. The study included patients with achondroplasia aged 9 to 12 years (n = 37), who at the age of 6-7 years underwent the first stage of treatment - lengthening of both tibias. At the second stage of treatment, the femur was lengthened first, and then the contralateral tibia. The period of femur distraction was 63±3 days, the elongation value was 6.5±0.5 cm. Ultrasound scanning (AVISUS Hitachi, Japan) of the bone regenerate was performed 7, 20, 30, 60 days after the beginning of distraction and once a month during the fixation period. Mathematical processing of the results was performed using the variation statistics method, p≤0.05, the reliability of differences was determined by the Wilcoxon W-criterion. Results. To maintain distraction, a "growth zone" of the regenerate is preserved in the middle part of the regenerate, in the form of a weakly mineralized layer with AP=65-85 conventional units. By the end of the distraction period, a narrowing of the echo-positive zone of the regenerate is noted, the amount of connective tissue layer decreases. At the beginning of the fixation period, due to the active mineralization process, the AP of the fragments and the regenerate reached 198±9.0 conventional units and 158±4.5 conventional units, respectively, which indicated the possibility of moderate physical activity on this limb and surgery on the contralateral tibia. Conclusion. Ultrasound criteria for reparative osteogenesis of the distraction regenerate of the femur, allowing for the lengthening of the contralateral tibia in patients with achondroplasia aged 9-12 years are the formation of a characteristic zonal structure of the regenerate throughout the distraction period, the absence of focal formations in all visualized zones of the regenerate, an increase in the AP of the regenerate by the end of the distraction period by 50%, compared with the initial period of treatment, a decrease in the width of the echo-positive zone of the regenerate by the beginning of the fixation period to 45-48% of the achieved lengthening value.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Tatyana I. Menshchikova

National Ilizarov Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopaedics

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: tat-mench@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5244-7539
SPIN 代码: 2820-9120

PhD, Dr. Sci. (Biol.)

俄罗斯联邦, Kurgan

Anna Aranovich

Ilizarov National Medical Research Centre for Traumatology and Orthopedics

Email: aranovich_anna@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7806-7083
SPIN 代码: 7277-6339

MD, PhD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

俄罗斯联邦, Kurgan

参考

  1. Pauli RM. Achondroplasia: a comprehensive clinical review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019;14(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13023-018-0972-6.
  2. Harris R, Patton JT. Achondroplasia and thanatophoric dwarfism in the newborn. Clin Genet. 1971;2(2):61-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1971.tb00257.x. PMID: 5165631.
  3. Horton WA, Hall JG, Hecht JT. Achondroplasia. Lancet. 2007 Jul 14;370(9582):162-172. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61090-3. PMID: 17630040.
  4. Wrobel W, Pach E, Ben-Skowronek I. Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Treatment Methods in Achondroplasia: A Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 May 25;22(11):5573. doi: 10.3390/ijms22115573. PMID: 34070375; PMCID: PMC8197470.].
  5. Murton MC, Drane ELA, Goff-Leggett DM et al. Burden and Treatment of Achondroplasia: A Systematic Literature Review. Adv Ther. 2023 Sep;40(9):3639-3680. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02549-3. Epub 2023 Jun 29. PMID: 37382866; PMCID: PMC10427595
  6. Foreman PK, Van Kessel F, Van Hoorn R et al. Birth prevalence of achondroplasia: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Am J. Med Genet A. 2020 Oct;182(10):2297-2316. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61787. Epub 2020 Aug 17. PMID: 32803853; PMCID: PMC7540685.
  7. Legare JM. Achondroplasia. 1998 Oct 12 [updated 2023; May 11]. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Amemiya A, editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993–2025. PMID: 20301331.
  8. Louise Tofts, Penny Ireland, Tracy Tate et al. Consensus Guidelines for the Use of Vosoritide in Children with Achondroplasia in Australia. Children;2024;1;789:11-13.https://doi.org/10.3390/children11070789.
  9. Biosse Duplan M, Dambroise E, Estibals Vet al. An Fgfr3-activating mutation in immature murine osteoblasts affects the appendicular and craniofacial skeleton. Dis Model Mech. 2021. Apr. 1;14(4):dmm048272. doi: 10.1242/dmm.048272. Epub 2021 Apr 23. PMID: 33737326; PMCID: PMC8084574.
  10. Shirley ED, Ain MC. Achondroplasia: manifestations and treatment. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2009. Apr;17(4):231-41. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200904000-00004. PMID: 19307672.
  11. Matsushita M, Esaki R, Mishima K, Ishiguro N, Ohno K, Kitoh H. Clinical dosage of meclozine promotes longitudinal bone growth, bone volume, and trabecular bone quality in transgenic mice with achondroplasia. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 7;7(1):7371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07044-8. PMID: 28785080; PMCID: PMC5547068.
  12. Hoover-Fong J, Scott CI, Jones MC; Committee on genetics. Health Supervision for People With Achondroplasia. Pediatrics. 2020 Jun;145(6):e20201010. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-1010. PMID: 32457214.
  13. Pfeiffer KM, Brod M, Smith A, Gianettoni J, Viuff D, Ota S, Charlton RW. Assessing physical symptoms, daily functioning, and well-being in children with achondroplasia. Am J Med Genet A. 2021 Jan;185(1):33-45. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61903. Epub 2020 Oct 20. PMID: 33084192; PMCID: PMC7756853.
  14. Sommer R, Blömeke J, Dabs M, Witt S, Bullinger M, Quitmann J. An ICF-CY-based approach to assessing self-and observer-reported functioning in young persons with achondroplasia—Development of the pilot version of the Achondroplasia Personal Life Experience Scale (APLES). Disabil. Rehabil
  15. Unger S, Bonafé L, Gouze E. Current Care and Investigational Therapies in Achondroplasia. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2017 Apr;15(2):53-60. doi: 10.1007/s11914-017-0347-2. PMID: 28224446; PMCID: PMC5435778.
  16. Akhondroplaziya: rukovodstvo dlya vrachey /pod red. A.V. Popkova, V.I. Shevtsova. M.: Meditsina, 2001. 352 s.
  17. Zheng X, Qin S, Shi L, Guo B, Zhao J, Yin H.Preliminary study of Ilizarov technique in treatment of lower limb deformity caused by achondroplasia. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Feb 15;37(2):157-161. Chinese. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202210072. PMID: 36796809; PMCID: PMC9970763.
  18. Chilbule SK, Dutt V, Madhuri V. Limb lengthening in achondroplasia. Indian. J. Orthop. 2016. Jul-Aug; 50(4):397-405. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.185604. PMID: 27512222; PMCID: PMC4964773
  19. Shevtsov V.I., Leonchuk S.S. Stimulyatsiya distraktsionnogo osteogeneza pri udlinenii konechnostey: nasha kontseptsiya. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii. 2021. T. 27. № 1. S. 75-85.
  20. Donaldson J, Aftab S, Bradish C. Achondroplasia and limb lengthening: Results in a UK cohort and review of the literature. J. Orthop. 2015 Jan. 28;12(1):31-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2015.01.001. PMID: 25829758; PMCID: PMC4353991.
  21. Novikov K.I., Klintsov E.V., Klimov O.V., Sergeev K.S. Failed distractional bone regeneration as a complication of distraction osteosynthesis: risk factors, preventive diagnosis, treatment. Genij Ortopedii. 2024;30(1):134-141. https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2024-30-1-134-141. EDN: EZRBEC
  22. Aranovich A.M., Stogov M.V., Tushina N.V., Kireeva E.A. C-reactive protein as a prognostic marker of distraction osteogenesis disorders. Preliminary results. Genij Ortopedii. 2020;26(3):382-384. https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2020-26-3-382-384
  23. Aranovich A.M., Stogov M.V., Kireeva E.F., Menshchikova T.I. Prediction and control of the distraction osteogenesis course. Analytical review. Genij Ortopedii. 2019;25(3):400-406. https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2019-25-3-400-406
  24. Bayram S, Yıldırım AM, Eralp L, Şen C, Kocaoğlu M, Balci Hİ. The Relationship Between Limb Lengthening Rate and Callus Quality in Patients with Achondroplasia. Indian J Orthop. 2022 Jul 16;56(11):1891-1896. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00694-5. PMID: 36310565; PMCID: PMC9561452.
  25. Puseva M.E., Lebedinskii V.Iu., Mikhailov I.N., Seliverstov P.V., Lepekhova S.A. Complex characteristic of forearm distraction regenerated bone experimentally. Genij Ortopedii. 2013;4:84-90. (In Russ.)
  26. Maffulli, N. Ultrasonographic monitoring of limb lengthening /N. Maffulli, T. Hughes, J. A. Fixsen // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 1992. – Vol. 74-B, No 1. – P. 130-131.
  27. Ciminari R, Galletti S, Pelotti P, Donzelly O. Correlazioni eco-radiografiche delle varie easi del rigenerato osseo negli allunfamenti degli arti secondoli, un protocollo di indagine// Giornale Ital. Ortoped. Traumatol. – 1991. –vol. –17, №3.–Р. 141-142.
  28. Hupperts R., Pfeil J., Kaps H.-P. Sonographische Verlaufskontrollen von Verlangerungsosyeotomien /Z. Orthop., 1990. –Bd.128, H1. –S.90-95.
  29. Menschikova T.I., Aranovich A. Tibial lengthening in achondroplasia patients aged 6–9 years as the first stage of growth correction. Genij Ortopedii. 2021;27(3):366-371. https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2021-27-3-366-371
  30. Luneva S.N., Menshchikova T.I., Aranovich A.M. Osobennosti reparativnogo osteogeneza distraktsionnogo regenerata bol'shebertsovoy kosti i soderzhaniye nekotorykh osteotropnykh faktorov rosta u bol'nykh akhondroplaziyey v vozraste 9-12 let Ortopediya, travmatologiya i vosstanovitel'naya khirurgiya detskogo vozrasta. 2022. T. 10. № 3. S. 223-234.
  31. Аborin S.А., Gorevanov E.А., Popkov D.А., Klimov О.V. Zonal change of the optical density of regenerated bone and femur in lengthening of congenitally shortened femur using the technique of bifocal distraction osteosynthesis. Genij Ortopedii. 2003;1:68-71. (In Russ.)
  32. Novikov K.I., Klimov O.V., NovikovaО.S. The roentgenologic characteristic features of distraction regenerated bone formation for the monofocal and bifocal variant of femoral lengthening in patients with achondroplasia. Genij Ortopedii. 2007;4:16-20. (In Russ.)
  33. Shevtsov V.I., Bakhlykov YU.N. Morfologicheskaya kharakteristika "zony rosta" distraktsionnogo regenerata pri udlinenii bol'shebertsovoy kosti v eksperimente Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2004. № 3. S. 123-127.
  34. Popkov A.V., Popkov D.A., Ir'yanov YU.M., i dr.Stimulyatsiya reparativnoy regeneratsii kostnoy tkani pri diafizarnykh perelomakh (eksperimental'noye issledovaniye) Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental'nykh issledovaniy. 2014. № 9-1. S. 82-88.
  35. Kolichestvennaya otsenka krovosnabzheniya periosta diafiza bol'shebertsovoy kosti sobaki pri udlinenii goleni metodom distraktsionnogo osteosinteza Ir'yanov YU.M., Gorbach Ye.N., Petrovskaya N.V. Morfologicheskiye vedomosti. 2007. № 1-2. S. 57-60.
  36. Larionov A.A., Kochetkov Y.S., Desiatnichenko K.S., Chirkova A.M. Experimental grounds for stimulation of formation and reorganization of distraction regenerated bone. Genij Ortopedii. 2000;1:24-30. (In Russ.)
  37. Shevtsov V.I., Irianov Y.M., Irianova T.Y. The effect of distraction on the shape-forming processes
  38. of regenerating bone tissue. Genij Ortopedii. 2005;4:77-80. (In Russ.)
  39. Novikov K.I., Komarova E.S., Kolesnikov S.V., Klimov O.V., Sergeev K.S. Evolution of tactical approaches to eliminating limb length discrepancy. Genij Ortopedii. 2024;30(2):301-308. https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2024-30-2-301-308. EDN: RPAGRV

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Эко-Вектор,



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС77-54261 от 24 мая 2013 г.