Ambulatory urodynamic monitoring

Cover Page

Abstract


The article describes the history and background of the ambulatory urodynamic monitoring (AUM). In details are described the indications, method of implementation and especially interpretation of study results. The results of the OUM in clinical practice and the benefits of the use are presented.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Igor Valentinovich Kuzmin

St.-Petersburg State I. P. Pavlov Medical University

Email: kuzminigor@mail.ru
doctor of medical science, professor. Department of Urology

References

  1. Bergman A., Bader K. Reliability of the patient's history in the diagnosis of urinary incontinence // Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. — 1990. — Vol. 32(3). — P. 255–259.
  2. Кузьмин И. В. Патогенез, клиническое течение и лечение гиперактивности мочевого пузыря. Автореферат дисс… д. м.н., Санкт-Петербург, 2007. — 39 с.
  3. Klevmark B. Ambulatory urodynamics // Br. J. Urol. — 1997. Vol. 79(3). — P. 490.
  4. James D. Continuous monitoring // Urol. Clin. North Am. — 1979. — Vol. 6(1). — P. 125–135.
  5. Van Waalwijk Van Doorn E., Zwiers W. Ambulatory monitoring to assess the efficacy of oxybutinin chloride in patients with mixed incontinence // Eur. Urol. — 1990. — Vol. 18. — P. 49.
  6. Van Waalwijk Van Doorn E., Remmers A., Janknegt R. A. Extramural ambulatory urodynamic monitoring during natural filling and normal daily activities: Evaluation of 100 patients // J. Urol. — 1991. — Vol. 146. — P. 124–131.
  7. Van Waalwijk Van Doorn E., Remmers A., Janknegt R.A. Conventional and extramural ambulatory urodynamic testing of the lower urinary tract in female volunteers // J. Urol. — 1992. — Vol. 147. — P. 1319.
  8. Van Waalwijk van Doorn E., Anders K., Khullar V. et al. Standartisation of ambulatory urodynamic monitoring. Report of the Standartisation Sub-committee of the ICS for ambulatory urodynamic studies // Neurourol. Urodyn. — 2000. — Vol. 19(2). — P. 113–125.
  9. Schäfer W., Abrams P., Liao L. et al. Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies // Neurourol. Urodyn. — 2002. — Vol. 21(3). — P. 261–274.
  10. Dokmeci F., Seval M., Gok H. Comparison of ambulatory versus conventional urodynamics in females with urinary incontinence // Neurourol. Urodyn. — 2010. — Vol. 29(4). — P. 518–521.
  11. Pannek J., Pieper P. Clinical usefulness of ambulatory urodynamics in the diagnosis and treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction // Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. — 2008. — Vol. 42(5). — P 428–432.
  12. Patravali N. Ambulatory urodynamic monitoring: are we wasting our time? // J. Obstet. Gynaecol. — 2007. — Vol. 27(4). — P. 413–415.
  13. Van Koeveringe G. A, Rahnamai M. S, Berghmans B. C. The additional value of ambulatory urodynamic measurements compared with conventional urodynamic measurements // BJU Int. — 2010. — Vol. 105(4). — P. 508–513.
  14. Cameron A. P. Incontinence: the role of ambulatory urodynamics in spinal cord injury // Nat. Rev. Urol. — 2011. — Vol. 8(6). — P. 298–299.
  15. Deshpande A. V., Craig J. C., Caldwell P. H., Smith G. H. Ambulatory urodynamic studies (UDS) in children using a Bluetooth-enabled device // BJU Int. — 2012. — Vol. 110(Suppl 4). — P. 38–45.
  16. Chapple C. R., Abrams P. Comparison of darifenacin and oxybutynin in patients with overactive bladder: assessment of ambulatory urodynamics and impact on salivary flow // Eur. Urol. — 2005. — Vol. 48(1). — P. 102–109
  17. Oh S. J., Ku J. H., Son H. C., Jeong J. Y. A comparative study of patient experiences of conventional fluoroscopic and four-hour ambulatory urodynamic studies // Yonsei Medical Journal. — 2006. — Vol. 47(4). — P. 534–541.
  18. Anders K., Cardozo L., Ashman O., Khullar V. Morbidity after ambulatory urodynamics // Neurourol. Urodyn. — 2002. — Vol. 21(5). — P. 461–463.
  19. Diokno A. C., Brown M. B., Brock B. M., Herzog A. R., Normolle D. P. Clinical and cystometric characteristics of continent and incontinent noninstitutionalized elderly // J. Urol. — 1988. — Vol. 140. — P. 567.
  20. Turner-Warwick R. T. Observations on the function and dysfunction on the sphincter and detrusor mechanisms // Urol. Clin. North Am. — 1979. — Vol. 6. — P. 13–30.
  21. Zinner N. R. Clinical aspects of detrusor instability and the value of urodynamics // Eur. Urol. — 1998. — Vol. 34(Suppl. 1). — P. 16–19.
  22. Abrams P. Urodynamics. Third Edition. Springer-Verlag London Ltd, 2006. — 339 p.

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 354

PDF (Russian) - 197

Cited-By


PlumX


Copyright (c) 2013 Kuzmin I.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies