Comparative evaluation of the results of two-stage abdominal testicle reduction by Fowler–Stephens and a one-stage method with preservation of testicular vessels

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Normal testicular function is only possible if it is located in the scrotum; if the testicle is undescended, fertility decreases and the risk of malignancy increases.

AIM: Aim of the study is to compare the results of a one-stage bringing down of the abdominal testicle with preservation of the testicular vessels and a two-stage Fowler–Stephens operation regarding the risk of atrophy of the reduced gonad.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 241 patients with a non-palpable testicle in the scrotum were observed, of which 125 (51.87%) patients the testicles were brought down with laparoscopic assistance. Three groups of patients were identified. The first group consisted of 105 (84%) patients who underwent testicular bringing down in two stages using the Fowler–Stephens technique with an interval of at least 6 months. The second group consisted of 20 (16%) patients whose underwent laparoscopic bringing down in one stage with preservation of the testicular vessels. The main criterion for effectiveness was the size of the gonad 6 months after surgery according to ultrasound. The third group included 116 (48.13%) patients with absent testicle.

RESULTS: In the first group the average duration of the first stage of the operation was 19.07 [10; 65] minutes, second stage 48.59 [20; 160] minutes. A total of 117 testicles were brought down to the scrotum. 77 (65.81%) hypoplastic gonads were identified, of which in 6 (5.13%) cases the volume of the testicle increased after the first stage of the operation, 8 (6.84%) gonads decreased in volume and 1 (0.85%) testicle atrophied after completing the second stage. In 62 (52.30%) testicles the size did not change between the stages of the operation. Subsequently, these gonads remained hypoplastic. In 40 (34.19%) gonads there was no decrease in volume, but between the stages of intervention, an increase in the volume of the organ was noted in 3 (2.56%) cases, in 7 (5.98%) cases a decrease in the volume of the gonads, in 29 (24.79%) of patients, the size of the testicles did not change between the stages of the operation, 1 (0.85%) of the gonad atrophied after the second stage of the operation. In the second group the average duration of the operation was 42.59 [20; 100] minutes. A total of 22 gonads were brought down, of which 6 (27.27%) testicles were not hypoplastic and did not decrease in size after being brought down into the scrotum, 16 (72.73%) — were initially hypoplastic. Of these, 1 (4.55%) gonad increased in volume, 1 (4.55%) — decreased, 14 (63.64%) — remained unchanged after surgery. There was no testicular atrophy after descent. In patients of the third group, in 40 (34.48%) cases, the vessels ended blindly in the abdominal cavity. In 3 (2.59%) boys, testicular buds located in the abdominal cavity were removed. The vessels of the testicle went into the inguinal canal in 73 (62.93%) cases, of which in 34 (29.31%) — the vessels ended blindly and 39 (33.62%) testicular rudiments were found, which were removed.

CONCLUSIONS: Bringing down of the testicle with preservation of its own vessels is more preferable compared to a two-stage operation due to the absence of the need for a second intervention on the gonad, a greater degree of preservation of testicular volume after its brought down and, in our case, the absence of gonadal atrophy after its descending.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Iliya M. Kagantsov

Almazov National Medical Research Centre; North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Author for correspondence.
Email: ilkagan@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3957-1615
SPIN-code: 7936-8722

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Aleksei A. Logval

Vologda Regional Children’s Hospital No. 2

Email: alex.logval@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3797-1156
Russian Federation, Cherepovets, Vologda Region

References

  1. Partin A, Dmochowski R, Kavoussi L, et al., eds. Campbell-Walsh-Wein Urology. 12th edition. Philadelphia, PA; Elsevier, 2020. 4096 p.
  2. Lima M, Manzoni G, eds. Pediatric urology. Contemporary strategies from fetal life to adolescence. Milano: Springer-Verlag Italia, 2015. 402 p. doi: 10.1007/978-88-470-5693-0
  3. Radmayr C, Bogaert G, Burgu B, et al. EAU guidelines on paediatric urology. EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, the Netherlands; 2023. 197 p. https://uroweb.org/guidelines/paediatric-urology
  4. Hutson JM, Southwell BR, Li R, et al. The regulation of testicular descent and the effects of cryptorchidism. Endocr Rev. 2013;34(5):725–752. doi: 10.1210/er.2012-1089
  5. Hutson JM, Li R, Southwell BR, et al. Germ cell development in the postnatal testis: the key to prevent malignancy in cryptorchidism? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2013;3:176. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2012.00176
  6. Thorup J, Clasen-Linde E, Li R, et al. Postnatal germ cell development in the cryptorchid testis: the key to explain why early surgery decreases the risk of malignancy. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2018;28(6):469–476. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1605350
  7. Gearhart J, Rink R, Mouriqand PE, eds. Pediatric urology. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier; 2010. 818 p.
  8. Smith JA, Preminger SS, Roger R, et al. Dmochowski. Hinman’s atlas of urologic surgery, 4th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2017. 995 p.
  9. Sizonov VV, Makarov AG, Kagantsov IM, Kogan MI. Cryptorchidism: a comprehensive assessment of the terminology and classification. Urology Herald. 2021;9(2):7–15. doi: 10.21886/2308-6424-2021-9-2-7-15
  10. Tasian GE, Copp HL, Baskin LS. Diagnostic imaging in cryptorchidism: utility, indications, and effectiveness. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(12):2406–2413. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.08.008
  11. Fowler R, Stephens FD. The role of testicular vascular anatomy in the salvage of high undescended testes. Aust N Z J Surg. 1959;29:92–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1959.tb03826.x
  12. Ransley PG, Vordermark JS, Caldamone AA, et al. Preliminary ligation of the gonadal vessels prior to orchidopexy for the intra-abdominal testicle. World J Urol. 1984;2:266–268. doi: 10.1007/BF00326700
  13. Bloom DA. Two-step orchiopexy with pelviscopic clip ligation of the spermatic vessels. J Urol. 1991;145(5):1030–1033. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38522-1
  14. Elder JS. Two-stage Fowler–Stephens orchiopexy in the management of intra-abdominal testes. J Urol. 1992;148(4):1239–1241. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36871-4
  15. Jordan GH, Winslow BH. Laparoscopic single stage and staged orchiopexy. J Urol. 1994;152(4):1249–1252. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32561-2
  16. Kirsch AJ, Escala J, Duckett JW, et al. Surgical management of the nonpalpable testis: the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia experience. J Urol. 1998;159(4):1340–1343
  17. Lindgren BW, Darby EC, Faiella L, et al. Laparoscopic orchiopexy: procedure of choice for the nonpalpable testis? J Urol. 1998;159(6):2132–2135. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63294-4
  18. Isidori AM, Lenzi A. Ultrasound of the testis for the andrologist morphological and functional atlas. Springer Cham; 2017. 270 p. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-51826-8
  19. Elzeneini WM, Mostafa MS, Dahab MM, et al. How far can one-stage laparoscopic Fowler–Stephens orchiopexy be implemented in intra-abdominal testes with short spermatic vessels? J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16(2):197.e1–197.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.01.003
  20. Song JQ, Bai DS, Hao CS, et al. Clinical efficacy of two-staged Fowler–Stephens laparoscopic orchidopexy in the treatment of children with high cryptorchidism. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020;100(44): 3520–3524. (Chinese). doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200319-00839
  21. Braga LH, Farrokhyar F, McGrath M, Lorenzo AJ. Gubernaculum testis and cremasteric vessel preservation during laparoscopic orchiopexy for intra-abdominal testes: effect on testicular atrophy rates. J Urol. 2019;201(2):378–385. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.07.045
  22. Elder JS. Surgical management of the undescended testis: recent advances and controversies. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2016;26(5):418–426. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1592197

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ №ФС77-65570 от 04 мая 2016 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies