Comparative evaluation of the results of two-stage abdominal testicle reduction by Fowler–Stephens and a one-stage method with preservation of testicular vessels

封面


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

BACKGROUND: Normal testicular function is only possible if it is located in the scrotum; if the testicle is undescended, fertility decreases and the risk of malignancy increases.

AIM: Aim of the study is to compare the results of a one-stage bringing down of the abdominal testicle with preservation of the testicular vessels and a two-stage Fowler–Stephens operation regarding the risk of atrophy of the reduced gonad.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 241 patients with a non-palpable testicle in the scrotum were observed, of which 125 (51.87%) patients the testicles were brought down with laparoscopic assistance. Three groups of patients were identified. The first group consisted of 105 (84%) patients who underwent testicular bringing down in two stages using the Fowler–Stephens technique with an interval of at least 6 months. The second group consisted of 20 (16%) patients whose underwent laparoscopic bringing down in one stage with preservation of the testicular vessels. The main criterion for effectiveness was the size of the gonad 6 months after surgery according to ultrasound. The third group included 116 (48.13%) patients with absent testicle.

RESULTS: In the first group the average duration of the first stage of the operation was 19.07 [10; 65] minutes, second stage 48.59 [20; 160] minutes. A total of 117 testicles were brought down to the scrotum. 77 (65.81%) hypoplastic gonads were identified, of which in 6 (5.13%) cases the volume of the testicle increased after the first stage of the operation, 8 (6.84%) gonads decreased in volume and 1 (0.85%) testicle atrophied after completing the second stage. In 62 (52.30%) testicles the size did not change between the stages of the operation. Subsequently, these gonads remained hypoplastic. In 40 (34.19%) gonads there was no decrease in volume, but between the stages of intervention, an increase in the volume of the organ was noted in 3 (2.56%) cases, in 7 (5.98%) cases a decrease in the volume of the gonads, in 29 (24.79%) of patients, the size of the testicles did not change between the stages of the operation, 1 (0.85%) of the gonad atrophied after the second stage of the operation. In the second group the average duration of the operation was 42.59 [20; 100] minutes. A total of 22 gonads were brought down, of which 6 (27.27%) testicles were not hypoplastic and did not decrease in size after being brought down into the scrotum, 16 (72.73%) — were initially hypoplastic. Of these, 1 (4.55%) gonad increased in volume, 1 (4.55%) — decreased, 14 (63.64%) — remained unchanged after surgery. There was no testicular atrophy after descent. In patients of the third group, in 40 (34.48%) cases, the vessels ended blindly in the abdominal cavity. In 3 (2.59%) boys, testicular buds located in the abdominal cavity were removed. The vessels of the testicle went into the inguinal canal in 73 (62.93%) cases, of which in 34 (29.31%) — the vessels ended blindly and 39 (33.62%) testicular rudiments were found, which were removed.

CONCLUSIONS: Bringing down of the testicle with preservation of its own vessels is more preferable compared to a two-stage operation due to the absence of the need for a second intervention on the gonad, a greater degree of preservation of testicular volume after its brought down and, in our case, the absence of gonadal atrophy after its descending.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Iliya Kagantsov

Almazov National Medical Research Centre; North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: ilkagan@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3957-1615
SPIN 代码: 7936-8722

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

俄罗斯联邦, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Aleksei Logval

Vologda Regional Children’s Hospital No. 2

Email: alex.logval@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3797-1156
俄罗斯联邦, Cherepovets, Vologda Region

参考

  1. Partin A, Dmochowski R, Kavoussi L, et al., eds. Campbell-Walsh-Wein Urology. 12th edition. Philadelphia, PA; Elsevier, 2020. 4096 p.
  2. Lima M, Manzoni G, eds. Pediatric urology. Contemporary strategies from fetal life to adolescence. Milano: Springer-Verlag Italia, 2015. 402 p. doi: 10.1007/978-88-470-5693-0
  3. Radmayr C, Bogaert G, Burgu B, et al. EAU guidelines on paediatric urology. EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, the Netherlands; 2023. 197 p. https://uroweb.org/guidelines/paediatric-urology
  4. Hutson JM, Southwell BR, Li R, et al. The regulation of testicular descent and the effects of cryptorchidism. Endocr Rev. 2013;34(5):725–752. doi: 10.1210/er.2012-1089
  5. Hutson JM, Li R, Southwell BR, et al. Germ cell development in the postnatal testis: the key to prevent malignancy in cryptorchidism? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2013;3:176. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2012.00176
  6. Thorup J, Clasen-Linde E, Li R, et al. Postnatal germ cell development in the cryptorchid testis: the key to explain why early surgery decreases the risk of malignancy. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2018;28(6):469–476. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1605350
  7. Gearhart J, Rink R, Mouriqand PE, eds. Pediatric urology. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier; 2010. 818 p.
  8. Smith JA, Preminger SS, Roger R, et al. Dmochowski. Hinman’s atlas of urologic surgery, 4th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2017. 995 p.
  9. Sizonov VV, Makarov AG, Kagantsov IM, Kogan MI. Cryptorchidism: a comprehensive assessment of the terminology and classification. Urology Herald. 2021;9(2):7–15. doi: 10.21886/2308-6424-2021-9-2-7-15
  10. Tasian GE, Copp HL, Baskin LS. Diagnostic imaging in cryptorchidism: utility, indications, and effectiveness. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(12):2406–2413. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.08.008
  11. Fowler R, Stephens FD. The role of testicular vascular anatomy in the salvage of high undescended testes. Aust N Z J Surg. 1959;29:92–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1959.tb03826.x
  12. Ransley PG, Vordermark JS, Caldamone AA, et al. Preliminary ligation of the gonadal vessels prior to orchidopexy for the intra-abdominal testicle. World J Urol. 1984;2:266–268. doi: 10.1007/BF00326700
  13. Bloom DA. Two-step orchiopexy with pelviscopic clip ligation of the spermatic vessels. J Urol. 1991;145(5):1030–1033. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38522-1
  14. Elder JS. Two-stage Fowler–Stephens orchiopexy in the management of intra-abdominal testes. J Urol. 1992;148(4):1239–1241. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36871-4
  15. Jordan GH, Winslow BH. Laparoscopic single stage and staged orchiopexy. J Urol. 1994;152(4):1249–1252. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32561-2
  16. Kirsch AJ, Escala J, Duckett JW, et al. Surgical management of the nonpalpable testis: the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia experience. J Urol. 1998;159(4):1340–1343
  17. Lindgren BW, Darby EC, Faiella L, et al. Laparoscopic orchiopexy: procedure of choice for the nonpalpable testis? J Urol. 1998;159(6):2132–2135. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63294-4
  18. Isidori AM, Lenzi A. Ultrasound of the testis for the andrologist morphological and functional atlas. Springer Cham; 2017. 270 p. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-51826-8
  19. Elzeneini WM, Mostafa MS, Dahab MM, et al. How far can one-stage laparoscopic Fowler–Stephens orchiopexy be implemented in intra-abdominal testes with short spermatic vessels? J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16(2):197.e1–197.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.01.003
  20. Song JQ, Bai DS, Hao CS, et al. Clinical efficacy of two-staged Fowler–Stephens laparoscopic orchidopexy in the treatment of children with high cryptorchidism. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020;100(44): 3520–3524. (Chinese). doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200319-00839
  21. Braga LH, Farrokhyar F, McGrath M, Lorenzo AJ. Gubernaculum testis and cremasteric vessel preservation during laparoscopic orchiopexy for intra-abdominal testes: effect on testicular atrophy rates. J Urol. 2019;201(2):378–385. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.07.045
  22. Elder JS. Surgical management of the undescended testis: recent advances and controversies. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2016;26(5):418–426. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1592197

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Eco-Vector, 2023



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ №ФС77-65570 от 04 мая 2016 г.


##common.cookie##