Surgical treatment of patients with strictures of the ureteropelvic junction: historical aspects
- Authors: Al-Shukri A.S.1, Kostyukov S.V.1, Kostyukov V.V.2
-
Affiliations:
- Academician I.P. Pavlov First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
- Orel State University named after I.S. Turgenev of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 11, No 1 (2021)
- Pages: 79-86
- Section: Reviews
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/uroved/article/view/63426
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/uroved63426
- ID: 63426
Cite item
Abstract
The review article is devoted to the history of surgical treatment of the ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The data on the main stages of development and improvement of the operative technique are presented, the main methods of restoring the outflow of urine from the kidney with strictures of the ureteropelvic junction are described. The analysis of modern methods of surgical treatment of this category of patients has been carried out.
Full Text
![Restricted Access](https://journals.eco-vector.com/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/text_lock.png)
About the authors
Adel S. Al-Shukri
Academician I.P. Pavlov First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: ad330@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6543-8589
SPIN-code: 5024-2184
Doc. Sci. (Med.), professor, head of the urological division No. 1 (General and Urgent Urology) of the Research Center of Urology
Russian Federation, 197022, Saint Petersburg, L'va Tolstogo str., 6-8Stanislav V. Kostyukov
Academician I.P. Pavlov First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Email: stanislav.kostyukov57@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3176-716X
Clinical resident of the Department of Urology
Russian Federation, 197022, Saint Petersburg, L'va Tolstogo str., 6-8Vladislav V. Kostyukov
Orel State University named after I.S. Turgenev of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
Email: kostuykovs3006@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7039-8622
Student
Russian Federation, 302026, Orel, Komsomolskaya str., 95References
- Pavlova VS, Kryuchko DS, Podurovskaya YuL, Pekareva NA. Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract: an analysis of modern diagnostic principles and prognostically significant markers of renal tissue damage. Neonatology: News, Opinions, Training. 2018;6(2):78–86. (In Russ.)
- Patel K, Batura D. An overview of hydronephrosis in adults. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2020;81(1):1–8. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2019.0274
- Tulp N. Observationes medicae. Elsevirium. 1672. 392 p.
- Murphy L, Desnos E. The History of Urology. Springfield – Il, Charles C. Thomas; 1972. 531 p.
- Poulakis V, Witzsch U, Schultheiss D, et al. History of ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair (pyeloplasty). From Trendelenburg (1886) to the present. Urologe A. 2004;43(12):1544–1559. doi: 10.1007/s00120-004-0663-x
- Gibson TE. Surgical aspects of hydronephrosis. Trans Am Assoc Genitourin Surg. 1954;46:107–108.
- Foley FE A new plastic operation for stricture at the uretero-pelvic junction. Report of 20 operations. J Urol. 1937;38(6):643–672
- Anderson JC, Hynes W. Retrocaval ureter; a case diagnosed pre-operatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation. Br J Urol. 1949;21(3):209–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1949.tb10773.x
- Onopko VF. Problemy hirurgicheskogo lecheniya obstrukcii lohanochno-mochetochnikovogo segmenta. Siberian Medical Review. 2012;(3):3–6. (In Russ.)
- Goligorskij SD, Kacyf AM. Hirurgiya lohanochno-mochetochnikovogo segmenta. Kishinev: Kartya Moldovenyaske; 1966. 196. p. (In Russ.)
- Persky L. Joaquin Albarran (1860–1912). Invest Urol. 1968; 5(5):519–520.
- Davis DM Intubated ureterotomy: a new operation for ureteral and ureteropelvic strictures. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1943;76:851.
- Wickham JE, Kellet MJ. Percutaneous pyelolysis. Eur Urol. 1983;9(2):122–124. doi: 10.1159/000474062
- Glybochko PV, Alyaev YuG. Endoskopicheskie operacii pri gidronefroze. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2011. (In Russ.)
- Goloshchapov-Aksenov RS, Komarov RN, Belov YuV. History of thoracic aortic stenting. The Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2014;7(5):41–46. (In Russ.)
- Boncevich DN. Hirurgicheskij shovnyj material. Moscow: Integrazia; 2005. 118 p. (In Russ.)
- Buyanov VM, Egiev VN, Udotov OA. Hirurgicheskij shov. Moscow: Antis; 2000. 92 p. (In Russ.)
- Al-Shukri AS, Nevirovich ES, Ignashov YuA. Our experience of laparoscopic pyeloplasty by left transmesenteric approach. Urologicheskie vedomosti. 2015;5(2):10–12. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/uroved5210-12
- Gubarev VI, Zorkin SN, Shakhnovsky DS. Modern approaches to the treatment of obstructed ureteropelvic junction in children. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2017;21(5):262–266. (in Russ.) doi: 10.18821/1560-9510-2017-21-5-262-266
- Symons SJ, Bhirud PS, Jain V, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: our new gold standard. J Endourol. 2009;23(3):463–467. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0208
- Komyakov BK, Guliev BG, Zagazezhev AV, Aliev RV. Surgical treatment of patients with obstruction of pyeloureteral segment. Grekov’s Bulletin of Surgery. 2015;174(3):24–28. (In Russ.) doi: 10.24884/0042-4625-2015-174-3-24-28
- Chen RN, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 1996;10(2):159–161. doi: 10.1089/end.1996.10.159
- Schatloff O, Weintraub Y, Leibovici D. Carbon dioxide-based nephroscopy during laparoscopic pyeloplasty provides suboptimal view when stones are located in the lower calices // J Endourol. 2011;25(1):97–99. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.040
- Komyakov BK, Guliev BG, Aliev RV. Laparoskopicheskaya plastika pieloureteral’nogo segmenta s simul’tannoj pielolitotomie. Vestnik urologii. 2015;(2):3–12. (In Russ.)
- Whelan JP, Wiesenthal JD. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with simultaneous pyelolithotomy using a flexible ureteroscope. Can J Urol. 2004;11(2):2207–2209.
- Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1993;150(6):1795–1799. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35898-6
- Kolontarevyu KB, Pushkar’ DYu, Govorov AV, Sheptunov SA. History of robotic technologies development in medicine. Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Povolzhskij Region. Medicinskie nauki. 2014;4(32):125–140. (In Russ.)
- Pushkar’ DYu, Govorov AV, Kolontarev KB. Robot-assisted surgery. Vestnik RAN. 2019;89(5):466–469. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31857/S0869-5873895466-469
- Gettman MT, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R. Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system. Urology. 2002;60(3):509–513. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01761-2
- Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988;35(2):153–160. doi: 10.1109/10.1354
- Dharia SP, Falcone T. Robotics in reproductive medicine. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.015
- Bann S, Khan M, Hernandez J, et al. Robotics in surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196(5):784–795. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01750-7
- Jakopec M, Harris SJ, Rodriguez y Baena F, et al. The first clinical application of a “hands-on” robotic knee surgery system. Comput Aided Surg. 2001;6(6):329–339. doi: 10.1002/igs.10023
- Morris B. Robotic Surgery: Application, Limitation, and Impact on Surgical Education. Medscape, 2021. Available from: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/511854_1.
- Roboticheskaja hirurgija v Rossii. [internet] Available from: https://robot-davinci.ru.
Supplementary files
![](/img/style/loading.gif)