Surgical treatment of patients with strictures of the ureteropelvic junction: historical aspects

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The review article is devoted to the history of surgical treatment of the ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The data on the main stages of development and improvement of the operative technique are presented, the main methods of restoring the outflow of urine from the kidney with strictures of the ureteropelvic junction are described. The analysis of modern methods of surgical treatment of this category of patients has been carried out.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Adel S. Al-Shukri

Academician I.P. Pavlov First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: ad330@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6543-8589
SPIN-code: 5024-2184

Doc. Sci. (Med.), professor, head of the urological division No. 1 (General and Urgent Urology) of the Research Center of Urology

Russian Federation, 197022, Saint Petersburg, L'va Tolstogo str., 6-8

Stanislav V. Kostyukov

Academician I.P. Pavlov First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Email: stanislav.kostyukov57@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3176-716X

Clinical resident of the Department of Urology

Russian Federation, 197022, Saint Petersburg, L'va Tolstogo str., 6-8

Vladislav V. Kostyukov

Orel State University named after I.S. Turgenev of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation

Email: kostuykovs3006@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7039-8622

Student

Russian Federation, 302026, Orel, Komsomolskaya str., 95

References

  1. Pavlova VS, Kryuchko DS, Podurovskaya YuL, Pekareva NA. Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract: an analysis of modern diagnostic principles and prognostically significant markers of renal tissue damage. Neonatology: News, Opinions, Training. 2018;6(2):78–86. (In Russ.)
  2. Patel K, Batura D. An overview of hydronephrosis in adults. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2020;81(1):1–8. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2019.0274
  3. Tulp N. Observationes medicae. Elsevirium. 1672. 392 p.
  4. Murphy L, Desnos E. The History of Urology. Springfield – Il, Charles C. Thomas; 1972. 531 p.
  5. Poulakis V, Witzsch U, Schultheiss D, et al. History of ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair (pyeloplasty). From Trendelenburg (1886) to the present. Urologe A. 2004;43(12):1544–1559. doi: 10.1007/s00120-004-0663-x
  6. Gibson TE. Surgical aspects of hydronephrosis. Trans Am Assoc Genitourin Surg. 1954;46:107–108.
  7. Foley FE A new plastic operation for stricture at the uretero-pelvic junction. Report of 20 operations. J Urol. 1937;38(6):643–672
  8. Anderson JC, Hynes W. Retrocaval ureter; a case diagnosed pre-operatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation. Br J Urol. 1949;21(3):209–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1949.tb10773.x
  9. Onopko VF. Problemy hirurgicheskogo lecheniya obstrukcii lohanochno-mochetochnikovogo segmenta. Siberian Medical Review. 2012;(3):3–6. (In Russ.)
  10. Goligorskij SD, Kacyf AM. Hirurgiya lohanochno-mochetochnikovogo segmenta. Kishinev: Kartya Moldovenyaske; 1966. 196. p. (In Russ.)
  11. Persky L. Joaquin Albarran (1860–1912). Invest Urol. 1968; 5(5):519–520.
  12. Davis DM Intubated ureterotomy: a new operation for ureteral and ureteropelvic strictures. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1943;76:851.
  13. Wickham JE, Kellet MJ. Percutaneous pyelolysis. Eur Urol. 1983;9(2):122–124. doi: 10.1159/000474062
  14. Glybochko PV, Alyaev YuG. Endoskopicheskie operacii pri gidronefroze. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2011. (In Russ.)
  15. Goloshchapov-Aksenov RS, Komarov RN, Belov YuV. History of thoracic aortic stenting. The Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2014;7(5):41–46. (In Russ.)
  16. Boncevich DN. Hirurgicheskij shovnyj material. Moscow: Integrazia; 2005. 118 p. (In Russ.)
  17. Buyanov VM, Egiev VN, Udotov OA. Hirurgicheskij shov. Moscow: Antis; 2000. 92 p. (In Russ.)
  18. Al-Shukri AS, Nevirovich ES, Ignashov YuA. Our experience of laparoscopic pyeloplasty by left transmesenteric approach. Urologicheskie vedomosti. 2015;5(2):10–12. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/uroved5210-12
  19. Gubarev VI, Zorkin SN, Shakhnovsky DS. Modern approaches to the treatment of obstructed ureteropelvic junction in children. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2017;21(5):262–266. (in Russ.) doi: 10.18821/1560-9510-2017-21-5-262-266
  20. Symons SJ, Bhirud PS, Jain V, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: our new gold standard. J Endourol. 2009;23(3):463–467. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0208
  21. Komyakov BK, Guliev BG, Zagazezhev AV, Aliev RV. Surgical treatment of patients with obstruction of pyeloureteral segment. Grekov’s Bulletin of Surgery. 2015;174(3):24–28. (In Russ.) doi: 10.24884/0042-4625-2015-174-3-24-28
  22. Chen RN, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 1996;10(2):159–161. doi: 10.1089/end.1996.10.159
  23. Schatloff O, Weintraub Y, Leibovici D. Carbon dioxide-based nephroscopy during laparoscopic pyeloplasty provides suboptimal view when stones are located in the lower calices // J Endourol. 2011;25(1):97–99. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.040
  24. Komyakov BK, Guliev BG, Aliev RV. Laparoskopicheskaya plastika pieloureteral’nogo segmenta s simul’tannoj pielolitotomie. Vestnik urologii. 2015;(2):3–12. (In Russ.)
  25. Whelan JP, Wiesenthal JD. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with simultaneous pyelolithotomy using a flexible ureteroscope. Can J Urol. 2004;11(2):2207–2209.
  26. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1993;150(6):1795–1799. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35898-6
  27. Kolontarevyu KB, Pushkar’ DYu, Govorov AV, Sheptunov SA. History of robotic technologies development in medicine. Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Povolzhskij Region. Medicinskie nauki. 2014;4(32):125–140. (In Russ.)
  28. Pushkar’ DYu, Govorov AV, Kolontarev KB. Robot-assisted surgery. Vestnik RAN. 2019;89(5):466–469. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31857/S0869-5873895466-469
  29. Gettman MT, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R. Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system. Urology. 2002;60(3):509–513. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01761-2
  30. Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988;35(2):153–160. doi: 10.1109/10.1354
  31. Dharia SP, Falcone T. Robotics in reproductive medicine. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.015
  32. Bann S, Khan M, Hernandez J, et al. Robotics in surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196(5):784–795. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01750-7
  33. Jakopec M, Harris SJ, Rodriguez y Baena F, et al. The first clinical application of a “hands-on” robotic knee surgery system. Comput Aided Surg. 2001;6(6):329–339. doi: 10.1002/igs.10023
  34. Morris B. Robotic Surgery: Application, Limitation, and Impact on Surgical Education. Medscape, 2021. Available from: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/511854_1.
  35. Roboticheskaja hirurgija v Rossii. [internet] Available from: https://robot-davinci.ru.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2021 Eco-Vector


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ №ФС77-65570 от 04 мая 2016 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies