Directive puncture of the renal collecting system during mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the supine position

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy is the main surgical method for removing large renal calculi. One of the key stages of the procedure is percutaneous access to the renal collecting system. Retrograde contrast administration is not always required for a successful renal puncture.

AIM: The work aimed to evaluate the efficacy, indications, and contraindications of directive puncture of the renal collecting system.

METHODS: The study was conducted from January 2020 to August 2022. It included 90 patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the supine position. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A underwent an ultrasound- or fluoroscopy-guided renal collecting system puncture; Group B had a puncture using retrograde ureteropyelography. Intra- and postoperative parameters were assessed, including total operation time, puncture duration, puncture success rate, visualization, puncture technique, and drainage type.

RESULTS: The groups were statistically homogeneous except for body mass index, which was higher in Group B (p = 0.0441) but did not affect the study outcome. There were no significant differences in puncture duration (p = 0.378) or visualization quality (p = 0.8221). Six hours after surgery, pain intensity was higher in the directive puncture group (p = 0.0422), whereas other pain and complication parameters did not differ between groups. Hemoglobin levels were lower in the directive puncture group (p = 0.0109) but remained within the normal range.

CONCLUSION: Directive puncture is a safe technique that is not inferior to the conventional method involving preliminary ureteral catheterization. However, it requires surgical experience and is unsuitable for patients with radiolucent calculi when performing fluoroscopy-guided punctures or in the absence of renal collecting system dilatation when performing ultrasound-guided punctures.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Dmitry S. Gorelov

Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University

Email: dsgorelov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7592-8167
SPIN-code: 3138-5214

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Alexandra A. Mischenko

Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: amischenko995@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7939-4062
SPIN-code: 2304-5596
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Vladimir M. Obidnyak

Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University

Email: v.obidniak@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7095-9765
SPIN-code: 5552-6673
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Ibragim E. Malikiev

Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University

Email: malikiev9511@gmail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6438-6959
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Vladislav P. Britov

Saint Petersburg State Institute of Technology (Technical University)

Email: deaf14@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5633-9164
SPIN-code: 6023-7000

Dr. Sci. (Engineering), Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Elizaveta V. Afanasyevskaya

Lomonosov Moscow State University; Istra Clinical Hospital

Email: e.afanasyevskaya@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0161-6072
SPIN-code: 4003-8573
Russian Federation, Moscow; Istra

Sergei B. Petrov

Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University

Email: petrov-uro@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3460-3427
SPIN-code: 2230-2519

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Nariman K. Gadzhiev

Saint Petersburg State University

Email: nariman.gadjiev@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6255-0193
SPIN-code: 5844-2520

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Skolarikos A, Jung H, Neisius A, et al. Urolithiasis. European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines; 2025.
  2. Russian Society of Urologists. Urolithiasis. Clinical guidelines. Russian Society of Urologists; 2024. 118 p.
  3. Fernström I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976;10(3):257–259. doi: 10.1080/21681805.1976.11882084
  4. Datta SN, Solanki R, Desai J. Prospective outcomes of ultra mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A consecutive cohort study. J Urol. 2016;195(3):741–746. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.123
  5. Sabnis R, Desai MR, Singh A. Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2022;36(S2):S35–S40. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0299
  6. Sahan A, Cubuk A, Ozkaptan O, et al. How does puncture modality affect the risk of intraoperative bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A prospective randomized trial. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2021;45(7):486–492. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.06.007
  7. Macchi V, Picardi E, Inferrera A, et al. Anatomic and radiologic study of renal avascular plane (Brödel’s Line) and its potential relevance on percutaneous and surgical approaches to the kidney. J Endourol. 2018;32(2):154–159. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0689
  8. Barcellos Sampaio FJ, Mandarim-de-Lacerda CA. 3-Dimensional and radiological pelviocaliceal anatomy for endourology. J Urol. 1988;140(6):1352–1355. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42042-8
  9. Bapir R, Bhatti KH, Eliwa A, et al. Infectious complications of endourological treatment of kidney stones: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2022;94(1):97–106. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2022.1.9
  10. Troxel SA, Low RK. Renal intrapelvic pressure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its correlation with the development of postoperative fever. J Urol. 2002;168(4–1):1348–1351. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64446-1
  11. Kanno M, Tanaka K, Akaihata H, et al. Reflex anuria following retrograde pyelography: A case report and literature review. Intern Med. 2020;59(2):241–245. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.3069-19
  12. Sharma GR, Luitel B. Techniques for fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous renal access: An analytical review. Indian J Urol. 2019;35(4):259–266. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_149_19
  13. Tabibi A, Akhavizadegan H, Nouri-Mahdavi K, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without retrograde pyelography: a randomized clinical trial. Int Braz J Urol. 2007;33(1):19–22. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382007000100004
  14. Rahman MH, Ali Khan SMS, Roy AK, et al. Outcome of calyceal access with or without retrograde pyelography in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Bangladesh J Urol. 2022;24(1):87–89. doi: 10.3329/bju.v24i1.59450 EDN: EWWJKE
  15. Lopez FA, Dalinka M, Doboy JG. Pyelovenous backflow. Facts, fallacies and significance. Urology. 1973;2(6):612–614. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(73)90319-1
  16. Szewczyk W, Prajsner A, Szewczyk M. Pyelointerstitial, pyelovenous, and pyelosinus backflow during retrograde pyelography. Urol J. 2016;13(6):2932–2933.
  17. Gupta P, Choudhary GR, Pandey H, et al. Air vs contrast pyelogram for initial puncture access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Urolithiasis. 2021;49(3):261–267. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01222-6

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Flow chart of the study design according to CONSORT.

Download (225KB)

Copyright (c) 2025 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 89281 от 21.04.2025.