Using the results of systematic reviews in nursing practice
- Authors: Ostrovskaya I.V.1, Beloshitskaya N.K.2
-
Affiliations:
- Branch of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov» of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
- Medical Institute of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
- Issue: Vol 27, No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 53-56
- Section: Education: problems and solutions
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0025-8342/article/view/678632
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.29296/25879979-2025-02-07
- ID: 678632
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
Systematic reviews are becoming an integral part of the professional activities not only of physicians but also of nursing staff. But where can a nurse read them? We can use the library of the Cochrane Collaboration, as well as the website https://medsestra-nauka.ru/, where systematic reviews of practical relevance for nursing staff have recently been posted. A study of the opinions of Moscow nurses has shown that the nursing community understands the need to use the results of systematic reviews for the further development of nursing practice.
Full Text
About the authors
Irina V. Ostrovskaya
Branch of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov» of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: irina.ostrov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7932-4216
SPIN-code: 2400-9600
Ph.D., МВА, associate professor, Nursing Management Department
Russian Federation, MoscowNelly K. Beloshitskaya
Medical Institute of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Email: irina.ostrov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-8961-4934
Bachelor of Science in Nursing
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Jalalov S.C., Jalalova D.H., Hoch D.S. The role of systematic review and meta-analysis in technology assessment in health care. Medical technologies. Assessment and Choice. 2012; 3 (9): 10–16. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/rol-sistematicheskogo-obzora-i-metaanaliza-pri-otsenke-tehnologiy-v-zdravoohranenii (accessed on Oct. 01, 2024) (In Russian).
- Maturana A., Moya F., Donn S.M. Systematic reviews in neonatal respiratory therapy: are some findings misleading us? Neonatology: News. Opinions. Training. 2020; 3 (29): 54–59. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sistematicheskie-obzory-v-oblasti-respiratornoy-terapii-u-novorozhdennyh-vvodyat-li-nekotorye-vyvody-nas-v-zabluzhdenie (accessed on Oct. 03, 2024) (In Russian).
- Ciliska D. Evidence-based nursing: how far have we come? What’s next? Evid Based Nurs. 2006; 9 (2): 38–40. doi: 10.1136/ebn.9.2.38. PMID: 16615195 (accessed on Oct. 03, 2024).
- Derbisalina G. [et al].Trends in nursing research. Biology and Integrative Medicine. 2021; 47 (S1): 55–61. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tendentsii-issledovaniy-v-sestrinskom-dele (accessed on Oct. 10, 2024) (In Russian).
- Torchinsky N.V. Introduction to evidence-based nursing practice. Meditsinskaya sestra (The Nurse). 2008; (4): 32–33. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12909842 (accessed on Oct. 01, 2024) (In Russian).
- Ostrovskaya I.V. From evidence – to practice. Meditsinskaya sestra (The Nurse). 2012; (3): 4–8. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ot-dokazatelstv-k-praktike (accessed on Oct. 02, 2024) (In Russian).
- Fee P.A., Riley P., Worthington H.V. et al. Recall intervals for oral health in primary care patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 10 (10): CD004346. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004346.pub5. (Accessed on Oct. 06, 2024).
- Kunzler A.M., Helmreich I., Chmitorz A. et al. Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020; (7): CD012527. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012527.pub2 (accessed on Oct. 28, 2024).
Supplementary files
