Surgery of aortic defect in the P.V.Mandryka Central Military Clinical Hospital


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Presented the experience of traditional cardiac surgery for aortic defect in 191 patients. In 49.2% of cases, the clinic of aortic stenosis prevailed, with the obstructive function of the valve preserved. Surgeries to patients were performed under conditions of cardiopulmonary by sternotomy access. To replace the defective aortic valve, modern, both mechanical and biological prostheses were used. A significant reduction in the temporal parameters of the operation (up to 64%) was achieved when using the frameless Perseval-S bioprosthesis. Evaluation of the immediate results of the operation was carried out 2-3 months after the patients underwent a rehabilitation course. Subsequently, operated patients (n=180) were examined after 6, 12, 24 months. The classical method of surgical treatment of aortic defect remains a priority and relatively safe. If there is evidence, delay in surgical treatment increases the risk of intervention, and in some cases leads to failure.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

A. A Sergoventsev

PKU "Central military clinical hospital named after P. V. Mandryka" MO RF

Moscow

I. A Borisov

PKU "Central military clinical hospital named after P. V. Mandryka" MO RF

Moscow

V. V Dalinin

PKU "Central military clinical hospital named after P. V. Mandryka" MO RF

Email: vdalinin@mail.ru
Moscow

M. Yu Uimanova

PKU "Central military clinical hospital named after P. V. Mandryka" MO RF

Moscow

References

  1. Егоров И.В. Сенильный аортальный стеноз?: век изучения // Совpeменная ревматология. - 2007. - № 1 - С. 20-25.
  2. Хавандеев М.Л., Миролюбов Л.М., Нурмеев И.Н. Протезирование аортального клапана биологическими протезами // Фундаментальные исследования. - 2014. - Т. 4, № 1. - С. 177-180.
  3. Belkin R.N., Khalique O., Aronow W.S. et al. Outcomes and Survival with Aortic Valve Replacement Compared with Medical Therapy in Patients with Low-, Moderate-, and Severe-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis and Normal Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction // Echocardiography. - 2011. - Vol. 28, N 4. - P. 378-387.
  4. Ho E., Mathur M.N., Brady P.W. et al. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Very Elderly Patients Aged 80 Years and Over: Evaluation of Early Clinical Outcomes // Hear. Lung Circ. - 2014. - Vol. 23, N 3. - P. 242-248.
  5. Joudinaud T.M., Flecher E.M., Curry J.W. et al. Sutureless stented aortic valve implantation under direct vision: lessons from a negative experience in sheep // J. Card. Surg. - 2007. - Vol. 22, N 1. - P. 13-17.
  6. Kapadia S.R., Leon M.B., Makkar R.R. et al. 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with standard treatment for patients with inoperable aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): A randomised controlled trial // Lancet. - 2015. - Vol. 385, N 9986. - P. 2485-2491.
  7. Powell R., Pelletier M.P., Chu M.W.A. et al. The perceval sutureless aortic valve review of outcomes, complications, and future direction // Innov. Technol. Tech. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Surg. - 2017. - Vol. 12, N 3. - P. 155-173.
  8. Rajani R., Buxton W., Haworth P. et al. Prognostic benefit of transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with medical therapy in patients with inoperable aortic stenosis // Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. - 2010. - Vol. 75. - P. 1121-1126.
  9. Roques F., Michel P., Goldstone A.R., Nashef S.A.M. The logistic EuroSCORE II (Letter to the Editor ) // Eur. Heart J. - 2003. - Vol. 24. - P. 1-2.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2019 Sergoventsev A.A., Borisov I.A., Dalinin V.V., Uimanova M.Y.


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: № 01975 от 30.12.1992.