Role of additive technologies in modern reconstructive surgery.


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Modern technologies allow not only to virtually plan a reconstructive surgery, but also to obtain patterns for resection and osteotomy, individual titanium reconstructive plates based on the results of planning. In the period from 2007 to 2017 in the center of maxillofacial surgery and dentistry of the N.N.Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital was performed 144 operations to eliminate bone defects of various localization with the use of additive technologies. In 136 (93%) cases, these were defects of the bones of the facial skeleton and the cranial vault, in two cases - the clavicle, in one - the scaphoid bone, in one - the radius, in two - the humerus, in two cases - the femur defect. To eliminate defects in 125 (87%) cases, revascularized autografts were used, in 19 (13%) - alloplastic materials. The clinical observations of the successful use of additive technologies are given as examples. The use of surgical models and templates during reconstructive operations reduces the time of the operation itself and reduces the number of postoperative complications.

Full Text

Restricted Access

References

  1. ASTM F2792-12a, Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies, (Withdrawn 2015), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012. URL: www.astm.org (дата обращения: 14.08.2018).
  2. Hanasono M.M., Skoracki R.J. Computer-assisted design and rapid prototype modeling in microvascular mandible reconstruction // Laryngoscope. - 2013. - Vol. 123, N 3. - P. 597-604.
  3. Rodby K., Turin S., Jacobs R.J. et al. Advances in Oncologic Head and Neck Reconstruction: Systemic Review and Future Considerations of Virtual Surgical Planning and Computer Aided Design // Computer Aided Modeling. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. - 2014. - Vol. 67, N 9. - P. 1171-1185.
  4. Sharaf B., Levine J., Hirsch D., Bastidas J., Schiff B., Garfein E. Importance of computer-aided design and manufacturing technology in the multidisciplinary approach to head and neck reconstruction // Journal of Craniofacial Surgery - 2010. - Vol. 21, N 4. - P. 1277-1280.
  5. Toto J., Chang E., Agag R., Devarajan K., Patel S. and Topham N. Improved operative efficiency of free fibula flap mandible reconstruction with patient-specific, computer-guided preoperative planning // Head & Neck. - 2015. - Vol. 37, N 11. - P. 1660-1664.
  6. Wilde F., Plail M., Riese C., Schramm A., Winter K. Mandible reconstruction with patient-specific pre-bent reconstruction plates: comparison of a transfer key method to the standard method-results of an in vitro study // Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. - 2012. - Vol. 7, N 1. - P. 57-63.
  7. Zhuk D.M., Perfiliev S.A. CAS systems - computer-aided design systems in surgery // Nauka obrazovanie. Elektronnyy zhurnal. - 2011. - N 3. - P. 12. (in Russ.). URL: available at: http://technomag.edu.ru/doc/168885.html (дата обращения: 14.08.2018).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2019 Tereshchuk S.V., Ivanov S.Y., Sukharev V.A.



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: № 01975 от 30.12.1992.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies