On selection of external bleeding models for preclinical evaluation of the effectiveness of local haemostatic agents (literature review)


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

To temporarily stop of external bleeding traditionally use a pressure bandage or tourniquet, but not for all types of wounds it is possible and appropriate to apply these dressings. In recent times there has been significant progress in the development and improvement of local haemostatic agents used for the first aid. There are currently conflicting information about their effectiveness, presented by various authors, requires standardization of experimental models for pre-clinical testing of medical devices in this class. Following a review of domestic and foreign literature proposed to standardize external bleeding model for assessing the effectiveness of local haemostatic agents.

Full Text

Restricted Access

References

  1. Бояринцев В.В., Юдин А.Б., Назаров В.Б. и др. Доклиническая оценка эффективности местных гемостатических средств (экспериментальное исследование) // Медицина катастроф. - 2010. - T. 71, № 3. - C. 23-25.
  2. Давыденко В.В., Яшин С.М., Нечаев А.Ю., Доморад А.А. Эффективность аппликационного гемостатического средства «Гемофлекс Комбат» для остановки наружного артериовенозного кровотечения // Воен.-мед. журн. - 2015. - Т. 336, № 1. - С. 55-58.
  3. Самохвалов И.М., Рева В.А., Денисов А.В. и др. Усовершенствование экспериментальной модели для изучения эффективности местных гемостатических средств // Воен.-мед. журн. - 2015. - Т. 336, № 3. - С. 19-25.
  4. Acheson E.M., Kheirabadi B.S., Deguzman R. et al. Comparison of hemorrhage control agents applied to lethal extremity arterial hemorrhages in swine // J. of Trauma Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. - 2005. - Vol. 59, N 4. - P. 865-874.
  5. Alam H.B., Uy G.B., Miller D. et al. Comparative analysis of hemostatic agents in a swine model of lethal groin injury // J. of Trauma Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. - 2003. - Vol. 54, N 6. - P. 1077-1082.
  6. Arnaud F., Parreno-Sadalan D., Tomori T. et al. Comparison of 10 hemostatic dressings in a groin transection model in swine // J. of Trauma Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. - 2009. - Vol. 67, N 4. - P. 848-855.
  7. Arnaud F., Teranishi K.,Okada T. et al. Comparison of Combat Gauze and TraumaStat in Two Severe Groin Injury Models // J. of Surgical Research. - 2011. - Vol. 169, N 1. - P. 92-98.
  8. Bennett B.L., Littlejohn L. Review of New Topical Hemostatic Dressings for Combat Casualty Care // Military Medicine. - 2014. - Vol. 179, N 5. - P. 497-514.
  9. Bennett B.L, Littlejohn L.F., Kheirabadi B.S. et al. Management of External Hemorrhage in Tactical Combat Casualty Care: Chitosan-based Hemostatic Gauze Dressings-TCCC Guidelines -Change 13-05 // J. of Special Operations Medicine. - 2014. - Vol. 14, N 3. - P. 40-57.
  10. Clay J.G., Grayson J.K., Zierold M.D. Comparative Testing of New Hemostatic Agents in a Swine Model of Extremity Arterial and Venous Hemorrhage // Military Medicine. - 2010. - Vol. 175. - P. 280-284.
  11. Eryilmaz M., Ozer T., Mentes O. et al. Is the zeolite hemostatic agent beneficial in reducing blood loss during arterial injury? // Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. - 2009. - Vol. 15, N 1. - P. 7-11.
  12. Floyd C. T., Rothwell S.W., Martin R. et al. A salmon thrombin-fibrinogen dressing controls hemorrhage in a swine model compared to standard kaolin-coated gauze // J. Special Operations Medicine. - 2012. - Vol. 12, N 1. - P. 49-55.
  13. Floyd C.T., Rothwell S.W., Risdahl J. et al. Salmon thrombin-fibrinogen dressing allows greater survival and preserves distal blood flow compared to standard kaolin gauze in coagulopathic swine with a standardized lethal femoral artery injury // J. Special Operations Medicine. - 2012. - Vol. 12, N 2. - P. 16-26.
  14. Hoggarth A., Hardy C., Lyon A. Testing a new gauze hemostat with reduced treatment time. Advanced Technology Applications for Combat Casualty Care Conference 2011, abstract. Url: http://www.celoxmedical.com/wp-content/uploads/Celox-Rapid-reduced-compression-time-poster.pdf (Accessed on 28 Mar 2014 at Celox Rapid website).
  15. Kheirabadi B.S., Arnaud F., McCarron R. et al. Development of a Standard Swine Hemorrhage Model for Efficacy Assessment of Topical Hemostatic Agents // J. of Trauma Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. - 2011. - Vol. 71, N 1. - P. 139-146.
  16. Kheirabadi B.S., Edens J.W., Terrazas I.B. et al. Comparison of new hemostatic granules/powders with currently deployed hemostatic products in a lethal model of extremity arterial hemorrhage in swine // J. of Trauma Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. - 2009. - Vol. 66, N 2. - P. 316-328.
  17. Kheirabadi B.S., Mace J.E., Terrazas I.B. et al. Safety evaluation of new hemostatic agents, smectite granules, and kaolin-coated gauze in a vascular injury wound model in swine // J. of Trauma Injury, Infection and Critical Care. - 2010. - Vol. 68, N 2. - P. 269-278.
  18. Kheirabadi B.S., Scherer M.R., Estep J.S. et al. Determination of efficacy of new hemostatic dressings in a model of extremity arterial hemorrhage in swine // J. of Trauma Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. - 2009. - Vol. 67, N 3. - P. 450-459.
  19. Kozen B.G., Kircher S.J., Henao J. et al. An Alternative Hemostatic Dressing: Comparison of CELOX, HemCon, and QuikClot // Academic Emergency Medicine. - 2008. - Vol. 15, N 1. - P. 74-81.
  20. Kunio N.R., Riha G.M, Watson K.M. et al. Chitosan based advanced hemostatic dressing is associated with decreased blood loss in a swine uncontrolled hemorrhage model // The American Journal of Surgery. - 2013. - Vol. 205, N 5. - P. 505-510.
  21. Lawton G., Granville-Chapman J., Parker P.J. Novel hemostatic dressings // J. of the Royal Army Medical Corps. - 2009. - Vol. 155, N 4. - P. 309-314.
  22. Li J., Yan W., Jing L. et al. Addition of an alginate to a modified zeolite improves hemostatic performance in a swine model of lethal groin injury // J. of Trauma Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. - 2009. - Vol. 66, N 3. - P. 612-620.
  23. Littlejohn L.F.,Devlin J.J., Kircher S.S. et al. Comparison of Celox-A, ChitoFlex, WoundStat, and Combat Gauze Hemostatic Agents Versus Standard Gauze Dressing in Control of Hemorrhage in a Swine Model of Penetrating Trauma //Academic Emergency Medicine. - 2011. - Vol. 18, N 4. - P. 340-350.
  24. Mueller G.R., Pineda T.J., Xie H.X. et al. A novel sponge-based wound stasis dressing to treat lethal noncompressible hemorrhage // J. Trauma Acute Care Surgery. - 2012. Vol. 73, N 2. - P. 134-139.
  25. Pusateri A.E., Holcomb J.B., Kheirabadi B.S. et al. Making sense of the preclinical literature on advanced hemostatic products // J. of Trauma Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. - 2006. - Vol. 60, N 3. - P. 674-682.
  26. Pusateri A.E., McCarthy S.J., Gregory K.W. et al. Effect of a chitosan-based hemostatic dressing on blood loss and survival in a model of severe venous hemorrhage and hepatic injury in swine // J. of Trauma Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. - 2003. - Vol. 54, N 1. - P. 177-182.
  27. Rall J.M., Cox M., Songer A.G. et al. Comparison of novel hemostatic dressing with QuikClot combat gauze in a standardized swine model of uncontrolled hemorrhage // J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. - 2013. - Vol. 75, N 2. - P. 150-156.
  28. Sambasivan C.N., Cho S.D., Zink K.A. et al. A highly porous silica and chitosan-based hemostatic dressing is superior in controlling hemorrhage in a severe groin injury model in swine // American Journal of Surgery. - 2009. - Vol. 197, N 5. - P. 576-580.
  29. Schwartz R.B., Reynolds B.Z., Shiver S.A. et al. Comparison of two packable hemostatic Gauze dressings in a porcine hemorrhage model // Prehospital Emergency Care. - 2011. - Vol. 15, N 4. - P. 477-482.
  30. Sondeen J.L., Pusateri A.E., Coppes V.G. et al. Comparison of 10 different hemostatic dressings in an aortic injury // J. of Trauma Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. - 2003. - Vol. 54, N 2. - P. 280-285.
  31. Ward K.R., Tiba M.H., Holbert W.H. et al. Comparison of a new hemostatic agent to current combat hemostatic agents in a swine model of lethal extremity arterial hemorrhage // J. of Trauma Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. - 2007. - Vol. 63, N 2. - P. 276-283.
  32. Watters J.M., Van P.Y., Hamilton G.J. et al. Advanced hemostatic dressings are not superior to gauze for care under fire scenarios // J. of Trauma Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. - 2011. - Vol. 70, N 6. - P. 1413-1418.
  33. Xie H., Lucchesi L., Teach J. et al. Comparison of Hemostatic Efficacy of ChitoGauze and Combat Gauze in a Lethal Femoral Arterial Injury in Swine Model // Advanced Technology Applications for Combat Casualty Care Conference 2011, abstract. http://ftp.rta.nato.int/public//PubFullText/RTO/MP/RTO-MP-HFM-l 82///MP-HFM-182-25.doc (Accessed 25 March 2014 at NATO Science and Technology Organization website).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2016 Chepur S.V., Yudin A.B., Shperling I.A., Dezhurnyi L.I., Makhnovskii A.I., Blinda I.V.


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: № 01975 от 30.12.1992.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies