Use of the deep femoral artery as a tributary artery when performing arterial reconstructions

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

A retrospective analysis of the results of 100 bypass operations for arterial reconstruction below the inguinal ligaments was carried out. The patients were divided into two groups depending on the choice of the proximal anastomosis zone: group 1 (50 patients) – proximal anastomosis was performed from the common femoral artery, group 2 (50 observations) – from the deep femoral artery. In the early postoperative period in group 1, wound complications developed in 28% of cases, in group 2 – in 8%. When studying long-term results, no statistically significant differences were revealed in terms of primary shunt patency and amputation-free survival. The choice of the deep femoral artery as a tributary artery when performing infrainguinal autovenous reconstructions significantly facilitates the surgeon’s access to the artery in the presence of technical difficulties in isolating the neurovascular bundle in the vascular lacuna.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

A. Borisov

St. Petersburg City Hospital No. 14

Email: vmeda-na@mil.ru
俄罗斯联邦, St. Petersburg

K. Atmadzas

St. Petersburg City Hospital No. 14

Email: vmeda-na@mil.ru
俄罗斯联邦, St. Petersburg

N. Gruzdev

St. Petersburg City Hospital No. 14

Email: vmeda-na@mil.ru
俄罗斯联邦, St. Petersburg

A. Lipin

St. Petersburg City Hospital No. 14; The S.M.Kirov Military Medical Academy MH RF

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: vmeda-na@mil.ru
俄罗斯联邦, St. Petersburg; St. Petersburg

I. Khokhlova

St. Petersburg City Hospital No. 14

Email: vmeda-na@mil.ru
俄罗斯联邦, St. Petersburg

参考

  1. Национальные рекомендации по ведению пациентов с заболеваниями артерий нижних конечностей / Л.А.Бокерия, А.В.Покровский, А.В.Троицкий и др. // Ангиология и сосудистая хирургия. – 2019. – Т. 13, приложение. – С. 2–67.
  2. Национальные рекомендации по диагностике и лечению заболеваний артерий нижних конечностей / Л.А.Бокерия, А.В.Покровский, Р.С.Акчурин и др. – М., 2019. – 89 с.
  3. Ballotta E., Renon L., Toffano M., Giau G.D. Prospective randomized study on bilateral above-knee femoropopliteal revascularization: Polytetrafluoroethylene graft versus reversed saphenous vein // J. Vasc. Surg. – 2003. – Vol. 38, Iss. 5. – P. 1051–1055. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214 (03)00608-6
  4. Conte M.S., Bradbury A.W., Kolh P. et al. Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia // J. Vasc. Surg. – 2019. – Vol. 69, Iss. 6. – Р. 3S–125S.e40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.016
  5. Faries P.L., Logerfo F.W., Arora S. et al. A comparative study of alternative conduits for lower extremity revascularization: All-autogenous conduit versus prosthetic grafts // J. Vasc. Surg. – 2000. – Vol. 32, Iss. 6. – P. 1080–1090.
  6. Norgren L., Hiatt W.R., Dormandy J.A. et al. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II) // J. Vasc. Surg. – 2007. – Vol. 45, Iss. 1. – Р. S5–S67. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.037
  7. Suckow B.D., Kraiss L.W., Stone D.H. et al. Comparison of Graft Patency, Limb Salvage, and Antithrombotic Therapy Between Prosthetic and Autogenous Below-Knee Bypass for Critical Limb Ischemia // Ann. Vasc. Surg. – 2013. – Vol. 27, Iss. 8. – P. 1134–1145.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Borisov A.G., Atmadzas K.A., Gruzdev N.N., Lipin A.N., Khokhlova I.M., 2024



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: № 01975 от 30.12.1992.