Use of the deep femoral artery as a tributary artery when performing arterial reconstructions
- Authors: Borisov A.G.1, Atmadzas K.A.1, Gruzdev N.N.1, Lipin A.N.1,2, Khokhlova I.M.1
-
Affiliations:
- St. Petersburg City Hospital No. 14
- The S.M.Kirov Military Medical Academy MH RF
- Issue: Vol 345, No 6 (2024)
- Pages: 64-67
- Section: Brief articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0026-9050/article/view/636151
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.52424/00269050_2024_345_6_64
- ID: 636151
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
A retrospective analysis of the results of 100 bypass operations for arterial reconstruction below the inguinal ligaments was carried out. The patients were divided into two groups depending on the choice of the proximal anastomosis zone: group 1 (50 patients) – proximal anastomosis was performed from the common femoral artery, group 2 (50 observations) – from the deep femoral artery. In the early postoperative period in group 1, wound complications developed in 28% of cases, in group 2 – in 8%. When studying long-term results, no statistically significant differences were revealed in terms of primary shunt patency and amputation-free survival. The choice of the deep femoral artery as a tributary artery when performing infrainguinal autovenous reconstructions significantly facilitates the surgeon’s access to the artery in the presence of technical difficulties in isolating the neurovascular bundle in the vascular lacuna.
Full Text
About the authors
A. G. Borisov
St. Petersburg City Hospital No. 14
Email: vmeda-na@mil.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg
K. A. Atmadzas
St. Petersburg City Hospital No. 14
Email: vmeda-na@mil.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg
N. N. Gruzdev
St. Petersburg City Hospital No. 14
Email: vmeda-na@mil.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg
A. N. Lipin
St. Petersburg City Hospital No. 14; The S.M.Kirov Military Medical Academy MH RF
Author for correspondence.
Email: vmeda-na@mil.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg; St. Petersburg
I. M. Khokhlova
St. Petersburg City Hospital No. 14
Email: vmeda-na@mil.ru
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg
References
- Национальные рекомендации по ведению пациентов с заболеваниями артерий нижних конечностей / Л.А.Бокерия, А.В.Покровский, А.В.Троицкий и др. // Ангиология и сосудистая хирургия. – 2019. – Т. 13, приложение. – С. 2–67.
- Национальные рекомендации по диагностике и лечению заболеваний артерий нижних конечностей / Л.А.Бокерия, А.В.Покровский, Р.С.Акчурин и др. – М., 2019. – 89 с.
- Ballotta E., Renon L., Toffano M., Giau G.D. Prospective randomized study on bilateral above-knee femoropopliteal revascularization: Polytetrafluoroethylene graft versus reversed saphenous vein // J. Vasc. Surg. – 2003. – Vol. 38, Iss. 5. – P. 1051–1055. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214 (03)00608-6
- Conte M.S., Bradbury A.W., Kolh P. et al. Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia // J. Vasc. Surg. – 2019. – Vol. 69, Iss. 6. – Р. 3S–125S.e40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.016
- Faries P.L., Logerfo F.W., Arora S. et al. A comparative study of alternative conduits for lower extremity revascularization: All-autogenous conduit versus prosthetic grafts // J. Vasc. Surg. – 2000. – Vol. 32, Iss. 6. – P. 1080–1090.
- Norgren L., Hiatt W.R., Dormandy J.A. et al. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II) // J. Vasc. Surg. – 2007. – Vol. 45, Iss. 1. – Р. S5–S67. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.037
- Suckow B.D., Kraiss L.W., Stone D.H. et al. Comparison of Graft Patency, Limb Salvage, and Antithrombotic Therapy Between Prosthetic and Autogenous Below-Knee Bypass for Critical Limb Ischemia // Ann. Vasc. Surg. – 2013. – Vol. 27, Iss. 8. – P. 1134–1145.
Supplementary files
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).