PLACE OF ABDOMINAL AND VAGINAL SURGICAL DELIVERY IN MODERN OBSTETRICS. REALITY AND PROSPECTS
- Authors: KRASNOPOLSKY V.I1, LOGUTOVA L.S1, PETRUKHIN V.A1, BUYANOVA S.N1, POPOV A.A1, CHECHNEVA M.A1, AKHVLEDIANI K.N1, TSIVTSIVADZE E.B1, MELNIKOV A.P1
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Issue: No 1 (2012)
- Pages: 4-8
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/246665
- ID: 246665
Cite item
Abstract
Full Text
About the authors
V. I KRASNOPOLSKY
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
L. S LOGUTOVA
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Email: guzmoniiag@gmail.ru
V. A PETRUKHIN
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
S. N BUYANOVA
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
A. A POPOV
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
M. A CHECHNEVA
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
K. N AKHVLEDIANI
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
E. B TSIVTSIVADZE
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
A. P MELNIKOV
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
References
- Густоварова Т.А. Беременность и роды у женщин с рубцом на матке после кесарева сечения: Дис.. д-ра мед. наук. — Смоленск, 2007.
- Залесный А.В. Комплексная оценка состояния рубца на матке после кесарева сечения // Журн. акуш. и жен. бол. — 2010. — Т. 59, вып. 5. — С. 118—126.
- Петрова Л.Е. Опыт работы по ведению беременности и родов с рубцом на матке в родильном доме № 16 Санкт-Петербурга (с 1997 по 2006 г.) // Журн. акуш. и жен. бол. — 2010. — Т. 59, вып. 3. — С. 33—45.
- Сорокина О.В., Болотских В.М., Савичева А.М., Зайнулина М.С. Особенности микробиоценоза влагалища при активно-выжидательной тактике ведения беременных с преждевременным излитием околоплодных вод // Журн. акуш. и жен. бол. — 2010. — Т. 59, вып. 5. — С. 73-79.
- Фаткуллин И.Ф., Галимова И.Р. Кесарево сечение. — М.: МЕДпресс-информ, 2007.
- Guidelines for vaginal berth ofter previous caesarean birth. Sogc clinical practice guidelines. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada // J. Gynaecol. Obstet. — 2005. — Vol. 89, № 3. — P. 319—331.
- Guise J.M., Eden K., Emeis D. et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights // Evid. Rep. Technol. Assess. (Full Rep). — 2010. — Vol. 191. — P. 1—397.
- Hanley G.E., Janssen P.A., Greyson D. Regional variation in the cesarean delivery and assisted vaginal delivery rates // Obstet. and Gynecol. — 2010. — Vol. 115, № 6. — P. 1201—1208.
- Hospitals in Europe health care. Data 1998—2008. Hope European hospital and healthcare federation. — 2009. — P. 29.
- Johnson J.H., Figueroa R., Garry D. et al. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum — as — sisted deliveries // Obstet. and Gynecol. — 2004. — Vol. 103, № 3. — P. 513—518.
- O'Grady J.P., Pope C.S., Patel S.S. Vacuum extraction in modern obstetric practice: a review and critique // Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. — 2000. — Vol. 12, № 6. — P. 475—480.
- Patah L., Malik A.M. Models of childbirth care and cesarean rates in different countries // Rev. Saude Publ. — 2011. — Vol. 45, № 1. — P. 9.
- Prapas N., Kalogiannidis I., Masoura S. et al. Operative vaginal delivery in singleton term pregnancies: Shor-term maternal and neonatal outcomes // Hippokratia. — 2009. — Vol. 13, № 1. — P. 41—45.
- Ramires M.M. Vaginal birth after cesarean section // Obstet. and Gynecol. — 2010. — Vol. 115, № 6. — Р. 52—54.
- WHO. World Health statistics. — 2010.
- Zydon-Rochelle M.T., Cahill A.G., Spong C.Y. Birth after prior cesarean delivery: short-term maternal outcomes // Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. W.H. Natcher conference center. National Institutes of Health. — Bethesda, Maryland, 2010. — P. 41—48.