PLACE OF ABDOMINAL AND VAGINAL SURGICAL DELIVERY IN MODERN OBSTETRICS. REALITY AND PROSPECTS
- Autores: KRASNOPOLSKY V.I1, LOGUTOVA L.S1, PETRUKHIN V.A1, BUYANOVA S.N1, POPOV A.A1, CHECHNEVA M.A1, AKHVLEDIANI K.N1, TSIVTSIVADZE E.B1, MELNIKOV A.P1
-
Afiliações:
- Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Edição: Nº 1 (2012)
- Páginas: 4-8
- Seção: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/246665
- ID: 246665
Citar
Texto integral
Acesso aberto
Acesso está concedido
Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Texto integral
Sobre autores
V. KRASNOPOLSKY
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
L. LOGUTOVA
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Email: guzmoniiag@gmail.ru
V. PETRUKHIN
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
S. BUYANOVA
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
A. POPOV
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
M. CHECHNEVA
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
K. AKHVLEDIANI
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
E. TSIVTSIVADZE
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
A. MELNIKOV
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Bibliografia
- Густоварова Т.А. Беременность и роды у женщин с рубцом на матке после кесарева сечения: Дис.. д-ра мед. наук. — Смоленск, 2007.
- Залесный А.В. Комплексная оценка состояния рубца на матке после кесарева сечения // Журн. акуш. и жен. бол. — 2010. — Т. 59, вып. 5. — С. 118—126.
- Петрова Л.Е. Опыт работы по ведению беременности и родов с рубцом на матке в родильном доме № 16 Санкт-Петербурга (с 1997 по 2006 г.) // Журн. акуш. и жен. бол. — 2010. — Т. 59, вып. 3. — С. 33—45.
- Сорокина О.В., Болотских В.М., Савичева А.М., Зайнулина М.С. Особенности микробиоценоза влагалища при активно-выжидательной тактике ведения беременных с преждевременным излитием околоплодных вод // Журн. акуш. и жен. бол. — 2010. — Т. 59, вып. 5. — С. 73-79.
- Фаткуллин И.Ф., Галимова И.Р. Кесарево сечение. — М.: МЕДпресс-информ, 2007.
- Guidelines for vaginal berth ofter previous caesarean birth. Sogc clinical practice guidelines. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada // J. Gynaecol. Obstet. — 2005. — Vol. 89, № 3. — P. 319—331.
- Guise J.M., Eden K., Emeis D. et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights // Evid. Rep. Technol. Assess. (Full Rep). — 2010. — Vol. 191. — P. 1—397.
- Hanley G.E., Janssen P.A., Greyson D. Regional variation in the cesarean delivery and assisted vaginal delivery rates // Obstet. and Gynecol. — 2010. — Vol. 115, № 6. — P. 1201—1208.
- Hospitals in Europe health care. Data 1998—2008. Hope European hospital and healthcare federation. — 2009. — P. 29.
- Johnson J.H., Figueroa R., Garry D. et al. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum — as — sisted deliveries // Obstet. and Gynecol. — 2004. — Vol. 103, № 3. — P. 513—518.
- O'Grady J.P., Pope C.S., Patel S.S. Vacuum extraction in modern obstetric practice: a review and critique // Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. — 2000. — Vol. 12, № 6. — P. 475—480.
- Patah L., Malik A.M. Models of childbirth care and cesarean rates in different countries // Rev. Saude Publ. — 2011. — Vol. 45, № 1. — P. 9.
- Prapas N., Kalogiannidis I., Masoura S. et al. Operative vaginal delivery in singleton term pregnancies: Shor-term maternal and neonatal outcomes // Hippokratia. — 2009. — Vol. 13, № 1. — P. 41—45.
- Ramires M.M. Vaginal birth after cesarean section // Obstet. and Gynecol. — 2010. — Vol. 115, № 6. — Р. 52—54.
- WHO. World Health statistics. — 2010.
- Zydon-Rochelle M.T., Cahill A.G., Spong C.Y. Birth after prior cesarean delivery: short-term maternal outcomes // Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. W.H. Natcher conference center. National Institutes of Health. — Bethesda, Maryland, 2010. — P. 41—48.
Arquivos suplementares
