Treatment for multiple myeloma: pharmacoeconomic aspects


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

To date, the choice of treatment policy for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is based primarily on factors, such as age and concomitant diseases. The widespread use and clinical application of cytogenetic techniques (karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)) has made it possible to identify and use cytogenetic abnormalities as prognostic biomarkers to assess key parameters, such as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), in patients with MM. Chromosomal abnormalities enable the identification of patients with a poor prognosis (high-risk myeloma) who have the lowest prognostic survival. Despite the clarification of the main mutations that cause a poor prognosis for survival in patients with myeloma, the question of choosing the most optimal therapy regimen to increase survival is still relevant. However, the optimal treatment has not been developed for patients with MM with high-risk cytogenetics at the time of diagnosis. With allowance made for the steadily increasing costs of managing MM patients, there is a need for their optimization just at the stage of choosing first-line therapy. The FISH assay may serve as the most rational approach to identifyng high-risk chromosomal abnormalities and to prescribing triplet therapy with new agents for these patients. The review provides brief information about the main chromosomal rearrangements occurring in MM ad their prognostic value and considers the pharmacoeconomic aspects of the treatment of patients with myeloma.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Yuliya Aleksandrovna Zabolotneva

A.I. Evdokinov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Email: ulia1984mail@gmail.com
Post graduate student of the Department of UNESCO «Здоровый образ жизни - залог успешного развития»

Konstantin Georgievich Gurevich

A.I. Evdokinov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Email: kgurevich@mail.ru
Head of the Department of UNESCO «Здоровый образ жизни - залог успешного развития»

Andrey Vladimirovich Zaborovsky

A.I. Evdokinov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Email: azabor@mail.ru
Head of the Department of фармакологии MGMSU, Doctor of Medical Sciences

Larisa Anatol'evna Tararina

A.I. Evdokinov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Email: 79104906528@yandex.ru
старший преподаватель of the Department of фармакологии MGMSU

References

  1. Cowan A.J., Alien C., Barac A. et al. Global Burden of Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. JAMA Oncol. 2018; 4 (9): 1221-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2128
  2. Bianchi G., Anderson K.C. Understanding biology to tackle the disease: Multiple myeloma from bench to bedside, and back. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2014; 64 (6): 422-44. DOI: 10.3322/ caac.21252.
  3. Morgan G.J., Johnson D.C., Weinhold N. et al. Inherited genetic susceptibility to multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2014; 28 (3): 518-24. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.344.
  4. Kumar S.K., Dispenzieri A., Lacy M.Q., et al. Continued improvement in survival in multiple myeloma: changes in early mortality and outcomes in older patients. Leukemia. 2014; 28 (5): 1122-8. D0I:10.1038/leu.2013.313
  5. Rajan A.M., Rajkumar S.V. Interpretation of cytogenetic results in multiple myeloma for clinical practice. Blood Cancer J. 2015; 5 (10): e365. D0I:10.1038/bcj.2015.92
  6. Corre J., Munshi N., Avet-Loiseau H. Genetics of multiple myeloma: another heterogeneity level? Blood. 2015; 125 (12): 1870-6. D0I:10.1182/blood-2014-10-567370
  7. Walker B.A., Wardell C.P., Murison A. et al. APOBEC family mutational signatures are associated with poor prognosis translocations in multiple myeloma. Nat. Commun. 2015; 6: 6997. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7997
  8. Sonneveld P., Avet-Loiseau H., Lonial S. et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics: a consensus of the International Myeloma Working Group. Blood. 2016; 127 (24): 2955-962. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-01-631200
  9. Walker B.A., Boyle E.M., Wardell C.P. et al. Mutational Spectrum, Copy Number Changes, and Outcome: Results of a Sequencing Study of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015; 33 (33): 3911-20. DOI: 10.1200/ JCO.2014.59.1503
  10. Van de Donk N.W., Mutis T., Poddighe P.J. et al. Diagnosis, risk stratification and management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering multiple myeloma. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2016; 38 (1): 110-22. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12504
  11. Palumbo A., Avet-Loiseau H., Oliva S. et al. Revised International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma: A Report From International Myeloma Working Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015; 33 (26): 2863-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2267
  12. Bergsagel P.L., Mateos M.V., Gutierrez N.C. et al. Improving overall survival and overcoming adverse prognosis in the treatment of cytogenetically high-risk multiple myeloma. Blood. 2013; 121 (6): 884-92. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-05-432203
  13. Durie B.G.M., Hoering A., Abidi M.H. et al. Bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma without intent for immediate autologous stem-cell transplant (SWOG S0777): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017; 389 (10068): 519-27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31594-X
  14. Mateos M.V., Dimopoulos M.A., Cavo M. et al. ALCYONE Trial Investigators. Daratumumab plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone for Untreated Myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018; 378 (6): 518-28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1714678
  15. Avet-Loiseau H., Facon T. Front-line therapies for elderly patients with transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma and high-risk cytogenetics in the era of novel agents. Leukemia. 2018; 32 (6): 1267-76. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0098-9
  16. Rajkumar S.V., Harousseau J.L. Next-generation multiple myeloma treatment: a pharmacoeconomic perspective. Blood. 2016; 128 (24): 2757-64. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-09-692947
  17. Прайс. Платные медицинские услуги. ФГБУ «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр гематологии» Минздрава России.
  18. Fonseca R., Hinkel J. Value and Cost of Myeloma Therapy-We Can Afford It. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book. 2018; 38: 647-55. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_200869
  19. Пядушкина Е.А., Боярская Т.В. Клиникоэкономический анализ применения иксазомиба в комбинации с леналидомидом и дексаметазоном у взрослых пациентов с рецидивирующей или рефрактерной множественной миеломой. Медицинские технологии. Оценка и выбор. 2018; 1 (31).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies