Standard Acetabular Component or Antiprotrusion Consolidating Design?

Abstract


The purpose of the study was determination of optimum technique for acetabular component revision depending on the volume of bone tissue deficit. Between 1992 and 2012 a total number of 843 partial or total revision hip replacement surgeries were performed. In 664 cases the indication for revision surgery was instability of acetabular component. Depending on the design of implant used (polyethylene cement cups, consolidating constructions, cementless cups) all patients were divided into 3 groups. Subsequently each group was divided into subgroups depending on the acetabular defect degree (by Paporsky classification). It was shown that for provision of maximum implant surveillance and reduction of the risk of most common operative complications the early clinical and radiologic detection of developing acetabular instability and revision performance was essential. In cases of delayed revision operation and significant bone tissue deficit it is reasonable to perform revision surgery using consolidating construction with additional bone defect plasty.

Full Text

Стандартный вертлужный компонент или антипротрузионная укрепляющая конструкция?

References

  1. тделением эндопротезирования крупных суставов
  2. Нуждин В.И., Троценко В.В, Попова Т.П., Каграманов С.В. Ревизионное эндопротезирование тазобедренного сустава. Вестник травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова. 2001; 2: 66-71.
  3. Загородний Н.В., Нуждин В.И., Каграманов С.В., Хоранов Ю.Г., Кудинов О.А., Аюшеев Д.Б., Кузьмин Ф.А. и др. 20-летний опыт эндопротезирования крупныхсуставов в специализированном отделении ЦИТО им. Н.Н. Приорова. Вестник травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова. 2011; 2: 52-8.
  4. Загородний Н.В. Эндопротезирование тазобедренного сустава. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2011.
  5. Paprosky W.G., Lawrence J, Cameron H.U. Classification and treatment of the failed acetabulum: A systematic approach. Contemp. Orthop. 1991; 2: 121-9.
  6. Weller S., Volkmann R., eds. Bicontact hip implant system. 1998: 182.
  7. Каграманов С.В. Способ восстановления целостности вертлужной впадины при ревизионном эндопротезировании тазобедренного сустава. Вестник травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова. 2009; 3: 23-7.
  8. Zweymuller K., Steindl M., Schwarzinger U. Good stability and minimal osteolysis with a biconical threaded cup at 10 years. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2007; 463: 128-37.
  9. Malchau H., Herberts P. Prognosis of total hip replacement. Revision and re-revision rate in THR: a revision-risk study of 148,359 primary operations. Scientific Exhibition, 65th AAOS Meeting, Feb. 19-23, 1998, New Orleans, USA.
  10. Kurtz S.M., Lau E, Schmier J., Ong K.L., Zhao K., Parvizi J. Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. J. Arthroplasty. 2008; 23 (7): 984-91.

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 30

Cited-By


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2013 Zagorodniy N.V., Kagramanov S.V., Nikolaev I.A., Bukhtin K.M.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies