PASSION ACCORDING TO EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE (IN CONTINUATION OF DISCUSSION)



Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The discussion continues about the place of instrumental assessment approaches in evidence-based medicine. The position of the validity of psychometry to objectify the assessment of treatment outcomes, including in group generalizations and in transcultural studies, is being defended. The selection of criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of antidepressant therapy is discussed.

About the authors

Mikhail Zobin

Author for correspondence.
Email: dr.zobin@yandex.ru

References

  1. Зобин М.Л. “Являются ли “измерения” человеческих чувств измерением в операциональном смысле?» // Неврологический вестник. 2019. №1. с. 70–72. [Zobin M.L. Yavlyayutsya li “izmereniya” chelovecheskikh chuvstv izmereniem v operatsionalʹnom smysle? (Whether a “measurement” of human feelings is a measurement in an operational sense?) Nevrologicheskii vestnik. 2019. No1. pp. 70–72. (In Russ.)]
  2. Зорин Н.А. Еще раз про любовь к доказательной медицине // Неврологический вестник. 2019. №2. с. 95—100. [Zorin N.A. Eshche raz pro lyubovʹ k dokazatelʹnoy meditsine (Once again about love for evidence-based medicine). Nevrologicheskii vestnik. 2019. No2. pp. 95‒100. (In Russ.)].
  3. Зорин Н.А. Методологический самообман. Имеют ли смысл квазиизмерения человеческих чувств и ощущений? // Неврологический вестник. 2018. №4. с. 19‒22. [Zorin N.A. Metodologicheskiy samoobman. Imeyut li smysl kvaziizmereniya chelovecheskikh chuvstv i oshchushcheniy? (Methodological self-deception. Do quasimeasurements of human sentiments and feelings make sense?) Nevrologicheskii vestnik. 2018. No4. pp. 19‒22. (In Russ.)]
  4. Bridger R. Psychometrics in ergonomics: measuring the mind. The Ergonomist 2014. April. 4-5.
  5. Берка К. Измерения, понятия, теории, проблемы. М.: Прогресс, 1987. 320 с. [Berka K. Izmereniya, ponyatiya, teorii, problemy. (Measurements, concepts, theories, problems.) Moscow: Progress, 1987. 320 p. (In Russ.)]
  6. Little T.D. Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Guilford Press; New York, NY: 2013.
  7. Borsboom D., Rhemtulla M., Cramer A.O. et al. Kinds versus continua: a review of psychometric approaches to uncover the structure of psychiatric constructs. Psychol Med. 2016 Jun; 46(8):1567-79.
  8. Maslowsky J., Jager J., Hemken D. Estimating and interpreting latent variable interactions: A tutorial for applying the latent moderated structural equations method. Int J Behav Dev. 2015 Jan 1; 39(1):87-96.
  9. Lubke G.H., Luningham J. Fitting latent variable mixture models. Behav Res Ther. 2017 Nov; 98:91-102.
  10. Miettunen J., Nordström T., Kaakinen M., Ahmed A.O. Latent variable mixture modeling in psychiatric research - a review and application. Psychol Med. 2016 Feb; 46(3):457-67.
  11. Кудря C.В., Давтян Е.Н. Что измеряет шкала депрессии Бека? // Психиатрия и психофармакотерапия. 2013. No 15(2). с. 57–60. [Davtyan E.N., Kudrya S.V. Chto izmeryaet shkala depressii Beka? (What measures the Beck Depression Scale?) Psikhiatriya i psikhofarmakoterapiya. 2014. No 16(2). pp. 59–63. (In Russ.)].
  12. Hambleton R.K., Kanjee A. Increasing the validity of cross-cultural assessments: Use of improved methods for test adaptations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 1995;11(3):147-157.
  13. McCrae R.R., Costa P.T. Jr., Martin T. A. et al. Consensual validation of personality traits across cultures. Journal of Research in Personality, 2004. 38(2), 179-201.
  14. Vindbjerg E., Makransky G., Mortensen E.L., Carlsson J. Cross-Cultural Psychometric Properties of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;64(1):39-46.
  15. Arafat Y., Chowdhury H.R., Qusar S., Hafez M.A. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of research instruments: A methodological review. J Behav Health. 2016. Vol 5. Issue 3 p. 129-36.
  16. Beaton D.E., Bombardier C., Guillemin F., Ferraz M.B. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25:3186-91.
  17. Gjersing L., Caplehorn J.R., Clausen T. Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: Language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010; 10:13.
  18. Swanepoel I., Krüger C. Revisiting validity in cross-cultural psychometric test development: A systems-informed shift towards qualitative research designs. SAJP, 2011, Vol. 17, No. 1, p. 10-14.
  19. Krueger R.F., Kotov R., Watson D. et al. Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology. World Psychiatry. 2018 Oct; 17(3): 282–293.
  20. Eysenck H.J. Meta-analysis of best-evidence synthesis? J Eval Clin Pract. 1995 Sep; 1(1):29-36.
  21. Bostwick J. M., Pankratz V.S. Affective Disorders and Suicide Risk: A Reexamination. Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Dec; 157(12):1925-32.
  22. Бернард Р.М., Бороховский Е.Ф Возможные искажения в мета-аналитических исследованиях. // Психология. Экономика. Право. 2015. № 1. С. 6–28. [Bernard R.M., Borokhovskiy E.F Vozmozhnye iskazheniya v meta-analiticheskikh issledovaniyakh. (Possible bias in meta-analytical studies) // Psikhologiya. Ehkonomika. Pravo. 2015. № 1. S. 6–28.]
  23. Conrad R., Walz F., Geiser F. et al. Temperament and character personality profile in relation to suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in major depressed patients. Psychiatry Res. 2009 Dec 30;170(2-3):212-7.
  24. McCain J.A. Antidepressants and Suicide in Adolescents and Adults. Pharmacy & Therapeutics, 2009 Jul; 34(7): 355-367, 378.
  25. Benard V., Vaiva G., Masson M., Geoffroy PA. Lithium and suicide prevention in bipolar disorder. Encephale. 2016 Jun;42(3):234-41.
  26. Williamson P.R., Altman D.G., Bagley H. et al. The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 Trials. 2017, 18(Suppl 3):280. Published online 2017 Jun 20. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4.
  27. Waszczuk M.A., Zimmerman M., Ruggero C. et al. What do clinicians treat: diagnoses or symptoms? The incremental validity of a symptom‐based, dimensional characterization of emotional disorders in predicting medication prescription patterns. Compr Psychiatry 2017; Nov; 79: 80‐88. Published online 2017 Apr 18. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.04.004

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2019 Zobin M.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 75562 от 12 апреля 2019 года.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies