Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of the impact of Aquashine line preparations on skin fibroblasts under aging in vitro (cell-molecular research)


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Introduction. Skin aging is a natural process that cannot be stopped. However, there are many ways to help stop premature aging of the skin and reduce the signs that have already appeared. One of them is the subcutaneous administration of preparations containing biomimetic peptides capable of interacting with growth factor receptors and providing an anti-aging clinical effect. The purpose of this study was to compare the geroprotective properties of the preparations Aquashine and Aquashine HA. Methods. To study the aging of skin fibroblasts in culture, the cell culture method was used, and immunocytochemistry and confocal microscopy were used to identify markers of aging. Results. The preparation Aquashine HA has the ability to activate proliferative processes in the skin, and, by virtue of its properties, regulates the processes of cell renewal through increased cell apoptosis. Conclusion. Aquashine HA has a more pronounced geroprotective effect compared to Aquashine.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

V. O Polyakova

Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductology; St. Petersburg State University

Z. I Gazitaeva

Institute of Beauty «Fijie»; St. Petersburg Institute of Bioregulation and Gerontology

T. S Kleimenova

Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductology; St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

A. O Drobintseva

Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductology; St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: anna.drobintseva@gmail.com

A. Yu Prokopov

ROS-Chemistry Laboratory

I. M Kvetnoy

Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductology; St. Petersburg State University

References

  1. Иммуногистохимические методы: руководство. Пер. с англ. под ред. ГА. Франка и П.Г Малькова. М., 2011; 224
  2. Рогова Л. Н., Шестернина Н. В., Замечник Т. В., Фастова И. А. Матриксные металлопротеиназы, их роль в физиологических и патологических процессах. Вестник новых медицинских технологий. 2011; 86-9
  3. Anastasiou D., Krek, W. SIRT1: Linking Adaptive Cellular Responses to Aging-Associated Changes in Organismal Physiology. Physiology. 2006; 21: 404-10.
  4. Sharma U., Carrique L., Vadon-Le Goff S., Mariano N., R-N. Georges. Structural basis of homo- and heterotrimerization of collagen I. Nat Commun. 2017; 8: 14671.
  5. Tilstra J.S., Clauson C.L., Niedernhofer L.J. NF-kB in Aging and Disease. Aging and Disease. 2011; 2 (6): 449-65.
  6. Маркелова Е.В., Здор В.В., Романчук А. Л., Бирко О.Н. Матриксные металлопротеиназы их взаимосвязь с системой цитокинов, диагностический и прогностический потенциал. Иммунопатология. 2016; 2: 11-22.
  7. Соловьева Н.И. Матриксные металлопротеиназы и их биологические функции. Биоорганическая химия. 1998; 4: 245-55.
  8. Ярмолинская М. И., Молотков А. С., Денисова В. М. Матриксные металлопротеиназы и ингибиторы: классификация, механизм действия. Ж. акуш. и жен. болезн. 2012; 1: 113-25.
  9. Franzke C.W., Bruckner P., Bruckner-Tuderman L. Collagenous transmembrane proteins: recent insights into biology and pathology. J. Biol. Chem. 2005; 280 (6): 4005-8.
  10. Carneiro N.S., Armada L., Pereira D.L., Vargas P.A., Lopes M.A., Pires F.R. Evaluation of KGF, EGF, VEGF, bcl-2, IL-6 and ki67 expression in oral epithelium adjacent to bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis and florid osseous dysplasia: a comparative immunohistochemical study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017; 124 (6): 548-53.
  11. Yerushalmi R., Woods R., Ravdin P.M. Ki-67 in breast cancer: prognostic and predictive potential. Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11 (2): 174-83.
  12. Michishita E., Park J.Y., Burneskis J.M., Barrett J.C., Horikawa I. Evolutionarily conserved and nonconserved cellular localizations and functions of human SIRT proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2005; 16: 4623-35.
  13. Mao Z., Hine C., Tian X., Van Meter M., Au M., Vaidya A., Seluanov A., Gorbunova V. SIRT6 promotes DNA repair under stress by activating PARP1. Science. 2011; 332 (6036): 1443-6.
  14. Moynihan K.A., Grimm A.A., Plueger M.M., Bernal-Mizrachi E., Cras-Meneur E., Permutt M. Increased dosage of mammalian Sir2 in pancreatic beta cells enhances glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in mice. 2005; 2 (2): 105-17.
  15. Газитаева З.А., Дробинцева А.О, Чанг Й., Полякова В.О., Кветной И.М. Молекулярные механизмы дермального геропротективного действия препаратов на основе биомиметических пептидов. Молекулярная медицина. 2015; 5: 16-9

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies