THE CONDITIONS OF LAWFUL CASE OF HARM WHEN CONDUCTING BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH IN RUSSIAN CRIMINAL LAW


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The purpose of the research. The relevance of the study is explained by the need to develop a scientifically based approach in determining the conditions for the lawfulness of harm to law-enforcement interests in the period of the biomedical research. Modern criminal legislation does not contain special criminal law provisions that would regulate the issues of criminal liability of persons who organized biomedical research involving any person or using a person as an experimental. Modern scientific research on this issue is mainly aimed at studying the problems of legal regulation of biomedical research in the Russian Federation and also aimed at the formulation of proposals for the criminalization of illegal biomedical research. At the same time in the theory of criminal law very little attention is paid to the problem of determining the conditions for the lawful infliction of harm to persons who took part in biomedical research. The advantage of the available scientific publications is aimed at the study of extreme necessity and reasonable risk as circumstances precluding criminality in various fields of professional activity. In this article the authors are built upon the basis of their own vision of the problem and propose a legislative definition of the conditions for the legality of causing harm during biomedical research and justify the need to identify an independent criminal law rule governing this problem. The main results of the study. The Russian criminal legislation along with the imperative method of regulating criminal relations also provides for the method of authorization, implemented in Chapter 8 of the Russian criminal law defining the conditions for the lawful infliction of harm in a situation where circumstances preclude criminality. Modern Russian criminal legislation does not keep pace with the rapid development of science and technology in connection with which there is an urgent need for the legislative definition of the boundaries of possible harm during scientific experiments. Scientific and practical significance of the work. The results of the study can be used in law enforcement and law-making activities as well as in teaching the training course of the Criminal Law of Russia and in conducting further scientific research on this scientific issue. The article is intended for students, graduate students and teachers of law schools and faculties, law enforcement officers as well as to anyone who are interested in this sphere.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Pavel Valerevich Volosjuk

North Caucasus Federal University

Email: pavel_volosuk@mail.ru
PhD at Law, associate professor. Position: Associate Professor. Department: Criminal Law and Process chair.

Alekxsandr Sergeevich Shiryev

Oktyabrsky District Court of Stavropol

PhD at Law. Position: Judge.

Viktoria Vladimirovna Cherevan

North Caucasus Federal University

postgraduate student.

References

  1. Малеина М.Н. Человек и медицина в современном праве: учебно-практическое пособие. М.: БЕК, 1995. 260 с.
  2. Захарова С.С. Обоснованный риск в уголовном праве Российской Федерации: дисс… канд. юрид. наук. Рязань, 2005. 237 с.
  3. Батырев И. Власти: препарат, отправивший шесть жителей Франции в реанимацию, принимали 90 человек // Информация получена на сайте информационного агентства ТАСС // www.tass.ru (дата посещения сайта 18.01.2019 г.)
  4. Павлова Н.В. Уголовно-правовое регулирование медицинской деятельности: дисс… канд. юрид. наук. М., 2006. 201 с.
  5. Караваева Е.И., Кравцов Р.В. Биомедицинские технологии: вопросы правового регулирования и ответственности // Сибирский юридический вестник. 2005. № 3. С. 7-12.
  6. Уголовный кодекс Франции / науч. ред. Л.В. Головко и Н.Е. Крыловой; пер. с фр. Н.Е. Крыловой. СПб., 2002. 650 с.
  7. Уголовный кодекс Азербайджанской Республики / науч. ред., предисл. И.М. Рагимова / пер. Б.Э. Аббасова. СПб., 2001. 325 с.
  8. Уголовный кодекс Грузии / науч. ред. З.К. Бигвава / пер. И. Мериджанашвили. СПб., 2001. 407 с.
  9. Блинов А.Г. Незаконное биомедицинское исследование и его уголовно-правовая оценка // Современное право. 2013. № 2. С. 103-108.
  10. Гринберг М.С. Оправданный профессиональный и хозяйственный риск // Вестник Омского университета. 2012. № 1. С. 386-389.
  11. Сариев О.М. Обоснованный риск в медицинской деятельности и условия его правомерности // Вестник Тамбовского государственного университета. Серия Гуманитарные науки. 2015. Выпуск 5 (145). С. 246-251;
  12. Сариев О.М. Условия правомерности обоснованного риска при проведении медицинского эксперимента // Актуальные проблемы современного уголовного права и криминологии: сборник статей Международной научно-практической конференции, прошедшей 6 февраля 2015 г. в Северо-Кавказском федеральном университете. Ставрополь: СКФУ, 2015. С. 228-236.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies