CRIMINAL LAW REGULATION OF ACCOUNTING CIRCUMSTANCES MITIGATING PUNISHMENT


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Task Challenge the relevance of the work derives from the fact that criminal-law regulatory issues of accounting of mitigating circumstances in sentencing are important in improving governmental responses to dangerous the acts referred to in current russian criminal law as a crime, for the protection of the rights and freedoms of the individual, property, public order, public safety, environment from criminal assault and their prevention. In the work are disclosed having a high level of scientific and practical significance of regulatory problems in the criminal law of accounting extenuating circumstances through the prism of the implementation of the provisions describing the content of the principles of justice and humanism. Based on analysis of problems designed and formulated legislative proposals to improve the art. 62 of the Criminal code, with focus on the specification of accounting rules extenuating circumstances. Conclusions The importance to ensure fairness of punishment is the maximum possible full inclusive account of extenuating circumstances. In the work of the proposal to amend the art. 62 of the Criminal code to include a provision according to which in the presence of mitigating circumstances provided for any item listed in h 1 art. 61 of the Criminal code, or other circumstances not covered by this provision, but accounted court as mitigating circumstances, and in the absence of aggravating circumstances or the size of the punishment may not exceed the maximum period or size 2/3 most strict punishment provided for in the criminal law rule on liability for the committed offence. Practical value Implementation in legislative activities contained in the work proposals for the improvement of criminal legislation would promote uniform jurisprudence, minimize the appeal judicial decisions in connection with the presence of mitigating circumstances not accounted or not fully accounted for sentencing purposes. In addition, the developed legislative nature proposals are oriented at improving the effectiveness of correctional treatment more equitable and humane punishment on the consciousness of man.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Rustam Ahtamovich Bazarov

Scientific-research institute of FPS Russia

Email: Blogbox66@yandex.ru
Dr of Law, Professor, Honored lawyer of the Russian Federation. Position: leading researcher.

References

  1. Краткая характеристика состояния преступности в Российской Федерации за январь-декабрь 2018 года // Электронный ресурс: URL https://мвд.рф/reports/item/ 16053092/ (дата обращения: 03.05.2019).
  2. Мингалимова М.Ф. Роль смягчающих обстоятельств при назначении наказания // Законность. 2013. № 9. С. 51-55.
  3. Постановление Пленума Верховного Суда Российской Федерации от 22 декабря 2015 г. № 58 «О практике назначения судами Российской Федерации уголовного наказания» (в ред. от 18.12.2018) // Электронный ресурс: Справочно-правовая система «Консультант Плюс».
  4. Розенко С.В., Девицына В.А. Проблемы назначения уголовного наказания при наличии обстоятельств, смягчающих наказание // Вестник Югорского государственного университета. 2017. № 1 (44). С. 109-112.
  5. Ростокинский А.В. Стратегия борьбы с преступностью в Российской Федерации // Всероссийский криминологический журнал: научный журнал Байкальского государственного университета. 2014. № 3. С. 5-9.
  6. Уголовное право: Часть Общая. Часть Особенная: учебник / под ред. Л.Д. Гаухмана, Л.М. Колодкина, С.В. Максимова. М., 1999. 784 с.
  7. Старков О.В. Криминопенология: учебное пособие. М., 2004. - 480 с.
  8. Яхьяева М.У. Обстоятельства, смягчающие наказание: проблемы систематизации и особенности учёта // Молодой учёный. 2015. № 23. С. 799-803.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies