Initiation and Consideration of a Criminal Case of Private Prosecution under Art. 116.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: Problems of Legal Regulation and Judicial Practice, Directions for Improving Criminal Procedure Legislation

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

Purpose of the study. The article discusses the gaps that arose in 2018 in the regulation of the procedure for initiating and considering a criminal case of private prosecution under Art. 116.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the related inconsistency of judicial practice. Conclusions. The authors propose to include in Part 2 of Art. 20 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, the norm that a criminal case on a crime under Art. 116.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, is initiated and considered by the district court in the manner prescribed by Ch. 41 Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. Prior to the introduction of these changes, the only legal option for initiating a criminal case under Art. 116.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is the filing of an application with the territorial internal affairs bodies with reference to Part 4 of Art. 20 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation (the inability to protect one's rights and legitimate interests by filing an application in a private prosecution case with the district court, to whose jurisdiction this case is referred to article 31 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation). In order to substantiate the legitimacy of such a procedure for initiating a criminal case, the victim or his legal representative has the right to refer to the practice set out in the article of refusal of district courts to accept applications in a private prosecution case under Art. 116.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the gaps in the current criminal procedure legislation.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Elena Shigurova

National Research Mordovia State University

Email: shigurova_elena@mail.ru
Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure, Justice and Prosecutorial Supervision Saransk, Russia

Alexander Shigurov

Middle-Volga Institute (branch) of the All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)

Email: arshigurov@mail.ru
Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Procedural Law and Criminalistics of the Faculty of Law Saransk, Russia

Bibliografia

  1. Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of April 25, 1995 No. 3-P // СЗ RF. 1995. No. 18. Art. 1708.
  2. Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 04/06/2004 No. 7-P // СЗ RF. 2004. No. 15. Art. 1519.
  3. Seydlits E.G. Problems of forming a jury: a method of random sampling // Russian Justice. 2018. No. 1 (141). pp. 99-103.
  4. Markelov A.G., Bubnova O.Yu. On some legislative errors of the modern Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation // Legal Technique. 2015. No. 9. P. 449-450.
  5. Udovichenko V.S. Participants in criminal proceedings with an uncertain procedural status // Eurasian legal journal. 2021. No. 12 (163). pp. 415-416.
  6. Criminal Code of the Russian Federation No. 63-FZ dated June 13, 1996 // SZ RF. 1996. No. 25. Art. 2954.
  7. Message of the President of the Russian Federation Dmitry Medvedev to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation dated 11/12/2009 // Rossiyskaya Gazeta. November 13, 2009
  8. On amendments to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation on the issues of improving the grounds and procedure for exemption from criminal liability: Federal Law of July 3, 2016 No. 323-FZ // SZ RF. 2016. No. 27 (part II). Art. 4256.
  9. Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses dated December 30, 2001 No. 195-FZ // SZ RF. 2002. No. 1 (part 1). Art. one.
  10. Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation dated December 18, 2001 No. 174-FZ // SZ RF. 2001. No. 52 (part I). Art. 4921.
  11. Markelov A.G. Criminal process (special part): study guide. Cheboksary, 2020. 356 p.
  12. In the case of checking the constitutionality of the provisions of Article 212.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of citizen I.I. Dadina: Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of February 10, 2017 No. 2-P // SZ RF. 2017. No. 9. Art. 1422.
  13. Resolution of the justice of the peace of the judicial district of the Sandovsky district of the Tver region dated July 17, 2017 in case No. 5-353 / 2017. - URL: https://sudact.ru/magistrate/doc/gf4lNUq j8KYz/
  14. Resolution of the Prikubansky District Court of Krasnodar dated February 25, 2020 in case No. 5-572/2020. - URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/5eUFuySnLgrj/
  15. On the submission to the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation of the draft federal law "On Amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation on the cognizance of criminal cases" : Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated December 19, 2017 No. 52. Access from the reference legal system "ConsultantPlus" .
  16. On Amendments to Articles 31 and 35 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation: Federal Law No. 509-FZ of December 27, 2018 // SZ RF. 2018. No. 53 (part I). Art. 8435.
  17. Resolution of the justice of the peace of the judicial district No. 132 of the Vykhino-Zhulebino district of Moscow dated 11/17/2020. - URL: https://m.mos-gorsud.ru/rs/kuzminskij/cases/docs/content/e4a56cd1-597e-11eb-bf05-5973af512946
  18. Resolution of the judge of the Novomoskovsk City Court of the Tula Region dated May 18, 2020 in case 1-153/2020. - URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/OaNo2UWkl3x4/
  19. Appeal ruling of the Krasnodar Regional Court dated November 22, 2019 in case No. 22-7659/2019. - URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/DnH03JHdFSmW/
  20. Resolution of the Nyuksensky District Court of the Vologda Region dated July 3, 2020 in case No. 1-25/2020. - URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/Fwe2teFa8Hol/
  21. Verdict of the Yalchik District Court of the Chuvash Republic dated February 12, 2020 in case No. 1-K-8/2020. - URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/Ll2BgBFWFD6c/
  22. Sentence of the Altai District Court of the Republic of Khakassia dated February 20, 2020 in case No. 1-3/2020. - URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/tx2STL9zWL5X/
  23. Sentence of the Rtishchevsky District Court of the Saratov Region dated September 21, 2020 in case No. 1-115/2020. - URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/x6v17f5yLB6N/
  24. Tetyuev S.V. On non-systemic changes in the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation (on the example of private prosecution cases) // Russian Justice. 2019. No. 3. S. 31 S. 29-31.
  25. Smirnova I.G., Shadrin M.Yu. Reforming or abolishing private prosecution: problem statement // Justice of the Peace. 2019. No. 4. S. 14-19.
  26. Golovinskaya I.V., Polikarpova M.Zh. Problems of initiation and consideration of criminal cases of private prosecution // Modern law. 2020. No. 5. S. 85-93.
  27. Mullanurov L.Sh., Nuriev T.M. Initiation of cases under Art. 116.1 of the Criminal Code // Legality. 2020. No. 8. S. 59-60.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies