Issues of Improving Criminal Procedural Evidence

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

A task. Based on the study of theoretical provisions and modern practice of proof and taking into account regulatory requirements, formulate the purpose of proof and analyze the features of the activities of participants in criminal proceedings who have the authority to collect, verify and evaluate evidence due to the establishment of circumstances to be proved. Methods: formal-legal, comparative-legal. Results: The authors come to the conclusion that the procedure of proof in criminal proceedings is caused by the goal of achieving the truth, which is possible only in the implementation of such criminal procedural activities, which is based on comprehensiveness, completeness and objectivity in making procedural decisions.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Yuri Viktorovich Frantsiforov

Saratov state law Academy

Email: franciforov@mail.ru
Dr.Sci.(Law), Professor, Professor of the criminal procedure Department Saratov, Russia

Aleksey Pavlovich Popov

Pyatigorsk State University

Email: p.aleksey777@mail.ru
Dr.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor, Professor in the Department of Criminal Law Disciplines and Forensic Expert Activity at Law Institute Pyatigorsk, Russia

Yuri Nikolaevich Tsarev

Saratov state law Academy

Email: mr.carev@bk.ru
Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor of the Department of criminal procedure Saratov, Russia

References

  1. Aleksandrov A.S. Introduction to judicial linguistics. N. Novgorod, 2003. - 420 p.
  2. Bushuev A.M. Philosophy. M.: Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2005. - 352 p.
  3. Vyshinsky A.Ya. Problems of evaluating evidence in the Soviet criminal process // Problems of criminal policy. 1937. No. 4. P.13-38.
  4. Golunsky S.A. On the probability and reliability in the criminal court // Problems of criminal policy. 1937. No. 4. -56-63 p.
  5. Kant I. Works. M., 1966. T. 5.-255 p.
  6. Lupinskaya P.A. The evidence in the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation // Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference on the adoption of a new Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. M., 2002. - 80 p.
  7. Rosenthal M.M. Philosophical Dictionary. M., 1975. - 496 p.
  8. Soloviev A.B. Proof of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (pre-trial stages). M., 2003. P.13 - 17.
  9. Franciforov Yu.V. Contradictions of criminal proceedings. Author. Diss ... D.Yu.N. N. Novgorod. 2007. - 74 p.
  10. Franciforov Yu.V. Contradictions of criminal proceedings. Saratov: Publishing House of SSU. 2005. - 492 p.
  11. Franciforov Yu.V. Contradictions of the criminal process. M.: Prior-Izdat. 2006. - 176 p.
  12. Cheltsov M.A. Criminal process. M., 1948. - 512 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies