Practical Features of the Qualification of Acts Aimed at Non-Execution of a Court Verdict, Court Decision or Other Judicial Act

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

This article is devoted to the consideration of the practical features of the qualification of acts for the commission of which criminal liability occurs if it turns out that they are aimed at non-execution of certain judicial acts. The relevance of the research topic is determined by the fact that the range of human rights is extremely wide, while the state has undertaken to protect them from illegal and unjustified encroachments. In this regard, everyone has the right to apply to the court for the protection of their rights and interests (part 1 of Article 46 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation). Currently, the activities of domestic courts are focused primarily on the correct, timely and full-fledged consideration and resolution of cases arising from the existing legal relations. The purpose of this article, which consists in analyzing the practical features of the qualification of acts under Article 315 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, largely depends on understanding the essence of the correct and timely execution of a court decision. As a general rule, any decision made by the courts on behalf of the Russian is correct, lawful and justified. Nevertheless, the law separately specifies the procedural aspects of making court decisions and establishes requirements regarding their legality and validity. In addition, the practical significance of the topic is confirmed by the importance of resolving competition between general and special rules. Taking into account these aspects, it is important to note that the protection of the rights of persons involved in the case is carried out, including through reasonable and balanced judicial decisions. In other words, non-execution of court decisions violates the basic foundations of the administration of justice in the Russian Federation, therefore, must be punished by law.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Vladimir Yurievich Barkho

Rostov State Economic University (RINH)

Email: v.barkho@mail.ru
postgraduate student, Department of Criminal and Penitentiary Law, Criminology Rostov-on-Don, Russia

References

  1. Criminal Code of the Russian Federation from 13.06.1996 No 63-FZ (red. from 24.09.2022) // Sobranie zakonodatel'naya RF. 1996. № 25. Art. 2954.
  2. Federal law of 02.10.2007 No. 229-FZ (red. of 14.07.2022) "On executive production" // Сollection of legislation RF. 2007. № 41. p. 4849.
  3. Manova N.S. On the essence of procedural decisions in criminal proceedings / N.S. Manov, E.V. Panteleeva // Law: history and modernity. 2020. № 2 (11). P. 100-111.
  4. The Supreme Court summed up the results of the work of the courts for 2021 // Pravo.ru. - Access mode: https://pravo.ru/story/239027/ (access date: 2022-10-25).
  5. Shikhanov V.N. Competition of general and special criminal-legal norms / V.N. Shikhanov // Legal. 2022. № 3. P. 26-32.
  6. Bordakova A.G. To the question of the classification of special norms in Russian law / A.G. Bordakova // Law and state: theory and practice. 2020. № 1 (181). P. 158-169.
  7. Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 19.12.2003 No. 23 (red. of 23.06.2015) "On the judicial decision" // Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. 2004. № 2.
  8. Sheveleva S.V. The principle of the inevitability of punishment in criminal-executive law: from declaration to the possibility of realization / S.V. Sheveleva, V.A. Mozhaikina // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. 2021. № 4. P. 722-753.
  9. Methodological recommendations for the detection and investigation of crimes under Article 177 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (malicious evasion of repayment of accounts payable) (approved by the FSSP of Russia on August 21, 2013, No. 04-12).
  10. Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation dated 17.02.2015 No. 395-O "On refusal to accept for consideration the complaint of citizen Kuznetsov Alexey Evgenievich on the violation of his constitutional rights by Article 315 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation".

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies