Positive Legal Responsibility in Labor Law

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

In the article, the object of the study is the relationship of labor responsibility arising between the parties to an employment contract in the process of production activity, consisting of its two independent types: disciplinary and material responsibility. The relevance of this work is emphasized by the increasing importance of legal responsibility in the conditions of further development of market relations, in particular, labor liability, which makes it necessary to conduct scientific research of this central institute of labor legislation. The subject of the study is the problems of legal positive responsibility in labor relations, the essence of which, according to some experts in the field of labor law, is that in addition to legal liability for an offense and in continuous connection with it, there is a legal positive responsibility. At the same time, the analysis of the judgments of jurists defending the idea of this responsibility at the level of the general theory of law, as well as the points of view of the labor scientists who supported them, both in Soviet and modern science of labor law, recognizing, along with negative responsibility, and the positive responsibility of disciplinary and material responsibility of the main subjects of labor relationships. In this regard, the arguments are given by means of which the inconsistency of such an approach to the understanding of labor-legal responsibility is argued, which significantly changes the concept of legal responsibility, generally recognized and well-established in general theoretical and branch sciences. The contribution of the author of the work to the study of legal responsibility, which is used in labor relations and other directly related relations, is the conclusions he made that legal positive responsibility is devoid of signs inherent in the legal category, and therefore it does not have a legal character. In this regard, its positive aspect is not essential for the construction of the concept of legal liability, which excludes the possibility of introducing legal positive liability into the sphere of work as its new variety.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Viktor Savin

Kuban State Agrarian University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: svt.2002@mail.ru
SPIN 代码: 6903-7310
Scopus 作者 ID: 810888

Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Land, Labor and Environmental Law

俄罗斯联邦, Krasnodar

参考

  1. Alekseev S. S. Problems of the theory of law. A course of lectures in two volumes. Vol. 1. Sverdlovsk, 1972. pp. 372, 204.
  2. Bazylev B. T. The essence of positive legal responsibility // Law. 1979. No. 4. p. 41.
  3. Bazylev B. T. Legal responsibility (theoretical issues). Krasnoyarsk. 1985. pp. 26, 47.
  4. Gusov K. N., Poletaev Yu. N. Responsibility under Russian labor law. M., 2011. pp. 43-44.
  5. Didenko N. G., Selivanov V. N. Law and freedom // Pravovedenie. 2001. No. 3. pp. 24-26.
  6. Ivanov S. A., Livshits R. Z. Personality in Soviet labor law. M., 1982. p. 206.
  7. Ilyin I. A. Path to evidence. M., 1993. p. 305.
  8. Kolosovsky A.V. Disciplinary responsibility: positive and retrospective aspect // Labor law. 2007. No. 8. p. 86.
  9. Kolosovsky A.V. Effectiveness of legal regulation of disciplinary and material responsibility: abstract. ... dis. cand. jurid. sciences'. Ekaterinburg, 2010. p. 22.
  10. Kosolapov R., Markov M. Freedom and responsibility. M., 1969. p. 15.
  11. Kuchinsky V. A. Personality, freedom, law. M., 1978. pp. 155-172.
  12. Leist O. E. Sanctions and responsibility under Soviet law. M., 1981. pp. 228-230.
  13. Malein N. S. Offense: concept, causes, responsibility. M., 1985. pp. 132, 131.
  14. Matuzov N. I., Malko A.V. Theory of state and law: Textbook. M., 2005. p. 277.
  15. Pyatakov A.V. Responsibility under Soviet labor law // Soviet state and law. 1981. No. 12. p. 30.
  16. Savin V. T. Problems of the concept of labor and legal responsibility of the labor contract // Actual problems of Russian law. 2014. No.7 (44) July. p. 1397.
  17. Samoshchenko I. S., Farukshin M. H. Responsibility under Soviet law. M., 1971. pp. 42-43.
  18. Smirnov V. G. Functions of Soviet criminal law. L., 1965. p. 78.
  19. Strogovich M. S. The essence of legal responsibility // The Soviet state and law. 1979. No. 5. p. 73.
  20. Syrovatskaya L. A. Responsibility for violation of labor legislation. M., 1990. pp. 28-30.
  21. Theory of state and law: textbook for bachelors / edited by V. K. Babaeva. M., 2013. p. 461.
  22. Labor law: textbook / edited by O. V. Smirnov, I. O. Snigireva. M., 2013. p. 86.
  23. Philosophical Dictionary / edited by I. T. Frolov. M., 1980. p. 434.
  24. Philosophical Dictionary / edited by M. M. Rosenthal. M., 1972. p. 200.
  25. Khalfina R. O. The general doctrine of legal relations. M., 1974. pp. 316-325.
  26. Chermenina A. P. Problems of responsibility in modern bourgeois ethics // Questions of philosophy. 1965. № 2.
  27. Shaburov A. S. Political and legal aspects of social responsibility of the individual: abstract. dis. ... doct. jurid. sciences'. Yekaterinburg, 1992. pp. 15-16.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
##common.cookie##