Actualization of Issues of Legal Technique in Relation to Articles 207.3, 280.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The Purpose of the study. The article deals with the problems of law enforcement practice in the field of qualification of acts related to discrediting the use of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. The issues of effective use of the potential of legal technology in criminal legislation are being updated. The interrelations between the observance of established traditions of the construction of criminal law norms and the accuracy, consistency and accessibility of the expression of the will of the legislator are established. The purpose of the study is to establish the design features of the norms of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, providing for liability for intentional actions aimed at distorting information (giving it a false character) about the use of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, and other entities involved in the orbit of ensuring the protection of the interests of the Russian Federation and its citizens.

Conclusion. Based on the results of the study, the authors come to the conclusion that when designing new norms of criminal legislation, it is necessary to adhere to a more traditional approach based on the rules of legal technique, which contributes to the formation of homogeneous law enforcement practice and minimizes cases of subjective interpretation of such norms. It determines not only the need for further research determined by modern threats to national security, but also reveals the prospects for further research of problems related to discrediting in the criminal law of Russia.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Natalia E. Martynenko

Management Academy of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: kafedra_up_au@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 5160-3124
Scopus Author ID: 543401

Dr.Sci.(Law), Professor, Professor of the Criminal Department

Russian Federation, Moscow

Ekaterina A. Usacheva

Belgorod Law Institute of Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation named after I.D. Putilin

Email: ketrinoketi@yandex.ru
SPIN-code: 1656-4660
Scopus Author ID: 1137890

Cand.Sci.(Law), Lecturer of the Criminal Law Disciplines Department

Russian Federation, Belgorod

References

  1. Alekseev S.S. General theory of law: Course in 2 vols. 2. M.: «Legal literature», 1982. 359 p.
  2. Vengerov A.V. Theory of state and law. M., 1999. 607 p.
  3. Ilyin I.K., Mironov N.V. On the form and style of legal acts (some questions of legislative technique) // Soviet state and law. 1960. No. 12. 65-73 p.
  4. Isaeva L.A., Ibragimova E.A. Correlation of legal technique and legal technology // Law and the state: theory and practice. 2020. No. 5 (185). pp. 59-60.
  5. General theory of State and law: academic course: in 2 volumes / edited by M.N. Marchenko. M., 1998. Vol. 2. 620 p.
  6. Palazyan A.S., Boldyrev S.N. Legal technique in the categorical apparatus of legal science // YUP. 2023. No. 2 (105). pp. 7-12.
  7. Pronina M.P. Rules of legal technique of criminal legislation // Bulletin of the SSSA. 2016. No. 6 (113). pp. 160-167.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies