Features of Judicial Control when Selecting a Measure of Prevention in the Form of House Arrest
- 作者: Mamedov R.Y.1
-
隶属关系:
- Kuban State University
- 期: 卷 17, 编号 8 (2024)
- 页面: 117-120
- 栏目: Criminal Law Sciences
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2072-3164/article/view/657496
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IVQGHU
- ID: 657496
如何引用文章
详细
The article analyzes current issues and problems of implementing judicial control when choosing a preventive measure in the form of house arrest. Particular attention is paid to the judicial practice that has developed in the application of this type of judicial control. The advantages of house arrest over other preventive measures are noted. In addition, the author puts forward proposals for improving the institution of house arrest.
全文:

作者简介
Ramil Mamedov
Kuban State University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: ramilmamedov90@mail.ru
SPIN 代码: 9602-3454
Cand. Sci. (Law), Assoc. Prof. of Criminal Procedure
俄罗斯联邦, Krasnodar参考
- Germevsky Yu. R. Judicial jurisdiction in the sphere of application of a preventive measure in the form of detention. Russian Justice. 2021. No. 1 (In Rus).
- Larkina E.V. A new preventive measure—a ban on certain actions. Criminal Law. 2018. No. 4 (In Rus.).
- Nazyrova N. A. Problems of alternative measures of restraint in the form of detention. Alley of Science. 2018. Vol. 4. No. 4 (20). Pp. 715–718.(In Rus.).
- Advocacy in Russia: textbook for universities. [ Sergeev V.I. et al.]; V.I. Sergeeva (gen. ed.).; Moscow Humanitarian and Economic Institute—Ed. 4th, revised. and add. Moscow: Justicinform, 2011. 1006, [1] s.; ISBN 978-5-7205-1086-2.
补充文件
