Features of Judicial Control when Selecting a Measure of Prevention in the Form of House Arrest

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article analyzes current issues and problems of implementing judicial control when choosing a preventive measure in the form of house arrest. Particular attention is paid to the judicial practice that has developed in the application of this type of judicial control. The advantages of house arrest over other preventive measures are noted. In addition, the author puts forward proposals for improving the institution of house arrest.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Ramil Mamedov

Kuban State University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: ramilmamedov90@mail.ru
SPIN 代码: 9602-3454

Cand. Sci. (Law), Assoc. Prof. of Criminal Procedure

俄罗斯联邦, Krasnodar

参考

  1. Germevsky Yu. R. Judicial jurisdiction in the sphere of application of a preventive measure in the form of detention. Russian Justice. 2021. No. 1 (In Rus).
  2. Larkina E.V. A new preventive measure—a ban on certain actions. Criminal Law. 2018. No. 4 (In Rus.).
  3. Nazyrova N. A. Problems of alternative measures of restraint in the form of detention. Alley of Science. 2018. Vol. 4. No. 4 (20). Pp. 715–718.(In Rus.).
  4. Advocacy in Russia: textbook for universities. [ Sergeev V.I. et al.]; V.I. Sergeeva (gen. ed.).; Moscow Humanitarian and Economic Institute—Ed. 4th, revised. and add. Moscow: Justicinform, 2011. 1006, [1] s.; ISBN 978-5-7205-1086-2.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML