Features of Judicial Control when Selecting a Measure of Prevention in the Form of House Arrest

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article analyzes current issues and problems of implementing judicial control when choosing a preventive measure in the form of house arrest. Particular attention is paid to the judicial practice that has developed in the application of this type of judicial control. The advantages of house arrest over other preventive measures are noted. In addition, the author puts forward proposals for improving the institution of house arrest.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Ramil Ya. Mamedov

Kuban State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: ramilmamedov90@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 9602-3454

Cand. Sci. (Law), Assoc. Prof. of Criminal Procedure

Russian Federation, Krasnodar

References

  1. Germevsky Yu. R. Judicial jurisdiction in the sphere of application of a preventive measure in the form of detention. Russian Justice. 2021. No. 1 (In Rus).
  2. Larkina E.V. A new preventive measure—a ban on certain actions. Criminal Law. 2018. No. 4 (In Rus.).
  3. Nazyrova N. A. Problems of alternative measures of restraint in the form of detention. Alley of Science. 2018. Vol. 4. No. 4 (20). Pp. 715–718.(In Rus.).
  4. Advocacy in Russia: textbook for universities. [ Sergeev V.I. et al.]; V.I. Sergeeva (gen. ed.).; Moscow Humanitarian and Economic Institute—Ed. 4th, revised. and add. Moscow: Justicinform, 2011. 1006, [1] s.; ISBN 978-5-7205-1086-2.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download