On the control of the administration of insolvency proceedings in the context of trends in the development of bankruptcy of enterprises
- Авторлар: Belikova K.M.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Kutafin Moscow State Law University
- Шығарылым: Том 18, № 4 (2025)
- Беттер: 83-96
- Бөлім: Private Law (Civil) Sciences
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2072-3164/article/view/689377
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2072-3164-2025-18-4-83-96
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DCEBSG
- ID: 689377
Дәйексөз келтіру
Аннотация
Using the example of provisions of Federal Law No. 127-FZ “On Insolvency (Bankruptcy)” and Draft Law No.1172553-7, as well as provisions of foreign legislation (France, USA) and doctrine and judicial practice, the author considers control of the administration of insolvency proceedings in the context of the trends in insolvency development. Along the way, corporate control becomes a subject of attention. The author starts with a subjective-objective approach to the world, using the dialectical method and other general and specific scientific methods such as comparative and historical analysis, synthesis and others. The result of the work, among other things, is the conclusion that a pro-debtor approach in insolvency (bankruptcy) law, which focuses on saving the debtors' businesses, and not just on satisfying creditors' demands, echoes which we can see from time to time in court decisions, in our opinion, requires a radical rethink of the classical understanding of bankruptcy management and the role of arbitration administrators and other participants in bankruptcy proceedings. The priorities of the control of the administration of insolvency proceedings should shift away from a credit-centric model where the main goal is to satisfy creditors as quickly as possible through liquidation. Such a control should become an instrument for achieving a balance of interests. The role of the arbitration manager (AM) needs to be transformed from a creditor-oriented role, when the arbitration manager is primarily seen as an agent for the creditors' meetings, fulfilling the wishes of these meetings to maximize current payments by reducing its task to inventorying property, valuing it and selling it, to understanding AM as a crisis manager/restructurer. This requires: 1) a revision of the authority of the arbitrator, who is severely limited in his ability to save a business without approval from the creditors meeting in terms of expansion, 2) moving the “risk zone” for AM, where its main risk is the dissatisfaction of the creditors due to insufficient payments, and 3) an increase in the role of courts, etc. Practical examples of applying this approach are shown. Legislation amendments, including those based on international experience, are suggested.
Толық мәтін

Авторлар туралы
Ksenia Belikova
Kutafin Moscow State Law University
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: KMBelikova@msal.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8068-1616
SPIN-код: 2541-3498
Dr. Sci. (Law), Prof., Professor of the Department of Entrepreneurial and Corporate Law
Ресей, MoscowӘдебиет тізімі
- Shershenevich G.F. The competitive process. 3rd ed. Moscow: Statute, 2021 p. 101 (477 p.).
- Boltovsky V.M. Competitive control: as a legal category of the institute of insolvency (bankruptcy). Bulletin of Arbitration Practice. 2024 No. 4. Pp. 84–90. (in Rus.).
- Telyukina M.V. Fundamentals of competition law. Moscow, 2004, Pp. 77–82.
- Rukinov M.V. Analysis of the bankruptcy phenomenon from the standpoint of the theory of economic security. Proceedings of the St. Petersburg State University of Economics. 2019 No. 1 (115). Pp. 23–27. (in Rus.).
- Corporate Law: A training course. In 2 vols. Vol. 2. Ed. by I.S. Shitkin. Moscow: Statute, 2018. 990 p.
- Shitkin A.O. The concept and grounds for the emergence of corporate control. Economy and law. 2020. No. 5. Pp. 104–121. (in Rus.).
- Kulagin M.I. State-monopolistic capitalism and a legal entity. Moscow: Statute, 2004. 363 p.
- Laptev V.A. The directive model of corporate governance with the participation of the state in the field of the military-industrial complex. Law enforcement. 2023 Vol. 7. No. 4. Pp. 136–145. doi: 10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(4).136-145. (in Rus.).
- Pokrovsky I.A. The History of Roman Law. I.A. Pokrovsky. Moscow: Statute: Consultant Plus, 2004 (JSC Yaroslav. polygr. comb.). 538 p. URL: https://civil.consultant.ru/elib/books/25/page_21.html?ysclid=mciworqb1q490698807 (accessed: 05/20/2025)
- Suvorov E.D. The exercise of corporate rights in case of bankruptcy of a corporation. Economic justice in the Russian Far East. 2021. No. 4 (23). Pp. 27–34. (in Rus.).
- Belikova K.M. Chatbots and AI agents in bankruptcy proceedings. Modern lawyer. 2025 No. 2. (51). Pp. 119–132. (in Rus.).
- Belikova K.M. Abuse of a dominant position in the legislation, doctrine and law enforcement practice of the European Union and the countries of the South American Common Market Argentina, Brazil and Peru. Law and politics. 2006, No. 7, Pp. 38–52. (in Rus.).
- Yershova I.V., Enkova E.E. Bankruptcy: legislative model and law enforcement practice. Lex Russica. 2016 No. 8 (117). Pp. 178–207. doi: 10.17803/1729-5920.2016.117.8.178-207. (in Rus.).
- Aliya Sandra Dewi, Yuhelson, Dewi Anggraeni. (2024). The Existence of a Stay Period in Bankruptcy That Begins with Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU). International Journal of Scientific Multidisciplinary Research, 2(6), 615–628. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijsmr.v2i6.9920 URL: https://journal.formosapublisher.org/index.php/ijsmr/article/view/9920 (date of request: 05/20/2025).
- Corporate Restructuring: Lessons from Experience. Michael, Pomerleano and William, Shaw (eds.). The World Bank, Washington, 2005. p. 130 (436 p.). URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/4a61a5ff-d581–5a40-b58b-57e415ab17cb/content (date of request: 05/20/2025).
- Morhat P.M. To the question of the concept of bankruptcy law in the Russian jurisdiction. Enterprise Law. 2024. No. 1. Pp. 10–17. (in Rus.).
Қосымша файлдар
