Institute of Expert Opinion in the Criminal Procedural Legislation of the Russian Federation and Near Abroad Countries

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Task: comparative legal analysis of features structure, form and content of the norms that make up the institution of expert opinion in criminal procedure legislation. Revealing tendencies of their development. Methods: formal legal, comparative legal. Results: formulated conclusions and proposals concerning the improvement of the institution of expert opinion in criminal procedural law. It is concluded that in future legislation, preference should be given not to conceptual, but to regulatory formulations.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Alexey Pavlovich Popov

Pyatigorsk State University

Email: p.aleksey777@mail.ru
Dr.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Criminal Law Disciplines and Forensic Expert Activities of the Law Institute Pyatigorsk, Russia

Artem Alekseevich Popov

LLC "TER-Engineering"

Email: art777.26@mail.ru
Cand.Sci.(Law), First Deputy General Director Moscow, Russia

Irina Alekseevna Popova

Prosecutor's Office of the city of Pyatigorsk

Email: p.irina777@mail.ru
Cand.Sci.(Law), Assistant to Prosecutor Pyatigorsk, Russia

References

  1. Grigoriev V.N., Pobedkin A.V., Yashin V.N. Criminal process: textbook. - 2nd ed., revised. and additional - M.: Eksmo, 2008. 816 p.
  2. Model Code of Criminal Procedure for the CIS Member States. Adopted at the 7th plenary session (Decree No. 7-6 of February 17, 1996) // Information Bulletin of the Interparliamentary Assembly of the CIS Member States (Appendix). 1996. No. 10. 386 p.
  3. Popov A.P. Documents as sources of evidence in the criminal procedure law of the Russian Federation and neighboring countries // Problems of Economics and Legal Practice. 2019. V. 15. No. 1. S. 201-204.
  4. Popov A.P., Kireev M.P., Popov A.A. Historical sources of understanding terrorism // Gaps in Russian legislation. 2014. No. 1. S. 89-92.
  5. Popov A.P., Popov A.A. Procedural and legal nature of testimony in criminal proceedings: a comparative view // Bulletin of the Kaliningrad branch of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2015. No. 1 (39). pp. 43-46.
  6. Popov A.P., Popova I.A. The institute of physical evidence in the criminal procedure law of states located in the post-Soviet space // Gaps in Russian legislation. 2020. No. 1. S. 173-177.
  7. Popov A.P., Popova I.A. Regulation of the results of operational-investigative activities in criminal procedure law // Bulletin of the Kaliningrad branch of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2013. No. 1 (31). pp. 7-11.
  8. Popov A.P., Popova I.A., Zinchenko I.A. Problems of modern criminal procedure evidence law: monograph. Pyatigorsk, 2019. 196 p.
  9. Criminal procedure legislation of the USSR and the RSFSR. Theoretical model / ed. V.M. Savitsky. M.: AN SSSR, 1990. 318 p.
  10. Federal Law of the Russian Federation of September 31, 2001 No. 73-FZ “On State Forensic Activities in the Russian Federation” (as amended and supplemented) // СЗ RF. No. 23. Art. 2291.
  11. Chekmareva G.I., Chernyshov V.N. Inadmissible evidence in criminal proceedings: problems of law enforcement // Socio-economic phenomena and processes. Tambov, 2017. Vol. 12. No. 4. P. 149-154.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies